«Ceri Rudman Blackwood Comprehensive School Read the following text. Kakapo Until recently the wildlife of New Zealand consisted of almost nothing but ...»
The importance of
Reading skills in the new
specifications for GCSE
Ceri Rudman Blackwood Comprehensive School
Read the following text.
Until recently the wildlife of New Zealand consisted of almost nothing but
birds. Only birds could reach the place. The ancestors of many of the birds
that are now natives originally flew there, but – and this is the point – there
were no predators. No dogs, no cats, no ferrets or weasels, nothing that the
birds needed to escape from particularly.
And flight, of course, is a means of escape. It’s a survival mechanism, and one that the birds of New Zealand found they didn’t especially need. Flying is hard work and consumes a lot of energy.
Not only that, there is also a trade off between flying and eating. The more you eat the harder it is to fly. So instead of having a light snack and then flying off, increasingly, the birds would settle in for a larger meal and go and waddle afterwards.
So when eventually European settlers arrived and brought cats and dogs and stoats and possums with them, a lot of these now flightless birds were suddenly waddling for their lives. The kiwis, the takahes – and the old night parrots the kakapos.
Of these, the kakapos is the strangest. It is a bird out of time. If you gaze at its large, round, greeny brown face, it has a look of serenely innocent incomprehension that makes you want to hug it and tell it that everything will be all right, though you know that it probably will not be.
It is an extremely fat bird. Its wings are just about good for waggling a bit if it thinks it’s about to trip over something – but flying is completely out of the question. Sadly, however, it seems that not only has the kakapo forgotten how to fly, but it has also forgotten that is has forgotten how to fly. Apparently a seriously worried kakapo will sometimes run up a tree and jump out of it, whereupon it flies like a brick and lands in a graceless heap on the ground.
By and large, though, the kakapo has never learnt to worry. It’s never had anything much to worry about.
Most birds, faced with a predator, will at least realise that something’s up and bolt for safety, even if it means abandoning any eggs or chicks in its nest – but not the kakapo. It has no conception that anything could possibly want to hurt it, so it tends to sit on its nest in a state of complete confusion and leaves the other animal to make the next move – which is usually a swift and final one.
How advanced is your verbal reasoning?
Put these events in order by numbering them 1 – 6.
• Predators arrived in New Zealand
• Some birds lost their ability to fly
• Birds in New Zealand lived safely without threat
• Flightless birds were at risk
• Birds’ dietary and exercise habits changed
• Bird numbers reduced.
And the answer is… statement numbe
In our school, pupils in Year 8 and 9 found this the most difficult question to access, even though Bloom’s taxonomy would
suggest this should not be that difficult a skill:
• Locating and retrieving information (find and copy)
• Comprehension and synthesis (understanding and processing the information)
• Analysis (inference and deduction)
• Appreciation and evaluation (understanding purpose / type of text etc.) Why?
Making texts accessible or `dumbing down`?
1 tier system for GCSE English Language has implications…….
Let’s pose a question – if we give pupils reading material which is always comfortably within their reading age, will they improve?
Do we, as good readers, need to understand every word to understand the meaning of the text?
How do we manage?
The case for demanding material.
Read the following:
SOME cultural archetypes leave the stage with a flourish, or at least some foot stomping. All those pith-helmeted colonialists, absinthe-addled poets and hippie gurus founding 1970s utopias: They made some noise, if not always much sense, before being swallowed by history. Yet one modern American type is slipping into the past without a rattle or even its familiar whimper — the neurotic.
For a generation of post-war middle-class Americans, being neurotic meant something more than merely being anxious, and something other than exhibiting the hysteria or other disabling mood problems for which Freud used the term. It meant being interesting (if sometimes exasperating) at a time when psychoanalysis reigned in intellectual circles and Woody Allen* reigned in movie houses.
That it means little now, to most Americans, is evidence of how strongly language drives the perception of mental struggle, both its sources and its remedies. In recent years, psychiatrists have developed a more specialized medical vocabulary to describe anxiety, the core component of neurosis, and as a result the public has gained a greater appreciation of its many dimensions. But in the process we’ve lost entirely the romance of neurosis, as well as its physical embodiment — a restless, grumbling, needy presence that once functioned in the collective mind as an early warning system, an inner voice that hedged against excessive optimism.
In today’s era of exquisite confusion — political, economic and otherwise — the neurotic would be a welcome guest, nervous company for nervous days, always ready to provide doses of that most potent vaccine against gloominess: wisecracking, urbane gloominess Some of the reasons that “neurotic” has fallen out of colloquial usage are obvious.
Freudian analysis lost its hold on the common consciousness, as well as in psychiatry, and some of Freud’s language lost its power. And scientists working to define mental disorders began to slice neurosis into ever finer pieces, like panic disorder, social anxiety and obsessive-compulsive disorder — all evocative terms that percolated up into common usage, not to mention into online user groups, rock lyrics and TV shows.
In 1994, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, psychiatry’s encyclopedia of mental disorders, officially dropped the word neurosis from the book. “The DSM is the lingua franca of psychiatry, and given what we know today the term feels old-fashioned and quaint,” said Dr. Michael First, a former editor of the manual. “With the general decline of value of Freud in our society, it is ultimately anachronistic.” Still, the desire for precision and the decline of Freudian thinking do not entirely explain the disappearance of the neurotic. Psychiatrists don’t ultimately shape the language we use, after all — we all do — and neurosis has at least as much going for it as other Freudian keepers, like ego and id.
The answer may reside in the one area of social science where the spirit of the neurotic is still alive and well: research psychology. “Neuroticism” is one of the “dimensions” of the so-called five-factor model of personality, the most studied measure in the field (other dimensions include conscientiousness and openness). It is rated using a simple questionnaire, in which people respond to statements like “I get irritated easily,” “I worry about things” and “I get stressed out easily.” Decades of research suggest that scores on those measures are relatively stable through life, and at least some of the differences in factors among people are rooted in genetic inheritance.
Over all, scores on those kinds of questionnaires have not changed much in adults in the United States since the 1950s. But recent studies have found that, among college students, neuroticism levels have increased by as much as 20 percent over the same period. Are young people today really more anxious and troubled — more neurotic — than their parents were at the same age? Many parents undoubtedly think so (college was a long time ago), and some researchers do, too.
But another way to read those numbers is not as a measure of mental makeup but of cultural change. People of all ages today, and most especially young people, are awash in self-confession, not only in the reality-show of pop culture but in the increasingly public availability of almost every waking thought, through Facebook, Twitter and other social media. If chronic Facebook or Twitter posting is not an exercise in neurosis, then nothing is.
The primary purpose of this passage is to:
A) define a term that has fallen into disuse
B) describe the irrevocable disappearance of a trait
C) expand on a well-known metaphor
D) claim that a term has changed too often over the years to have any real meaning
E) account for the apparent disappearance of a certain personality type
A) define a term that has fallen into disuse Is the passage mainly concerned with defining what a neurotic is? Isn’t the passage more concerned with trying to figure out what happened to the neurotic? True, in answering this second question the author mentions how the definition of neurotic may have changed. He does not spend the entire passage trying to define it. So while tempting, this answer choice is wrong.
B) describe the irrevocable disappearance of a trait Watch out for words like ‘irrevocable.’ Do not just pretend that the word is not there, focusing instead on the other words. While the passage does focus on the disappearance of the neurotic, this disappearance is not ‘irrevocable’, meaning impossible to reverse. In fact, the author says that neurotics may be all around us.
(C) expand on a well-known metaphor No metaphors are being used in this passage.
Neurotic is an actual tag used to describe certain people.
(D) claim that a term has changed too often over the years to have any real meaning Sure the word neurosis has changed over the years, “Neuroticism” is one of the “dimensions” of the so-called five-factor model of personality. However, nowhere in the passage does it mention that the term has changed too often over the years to have any real meaning.
(E) account for the apparent disappearance of a certain personality type
TEXT A The information refers to `demographic`. Select one definition from the list below that best defines a `demographic`?
a) A graph showing changes
b) Time spent away from home
c) A way of grouping people
d) A period spent travelling AWRT / New Specifications / Old specifications Read lines 53 – 77 What happens in these lines? What do you think and feel about Jackson in these lines? (10) AWRT / New Specs / Old Specs Look at the section called From museum to mountain
a) What does the word hoard refer to?
The bungalows The lorries The visitors The paintings
b) Find and copy the word which shows that the effort of moving all the pictures was worthwhile.
AWRT / New Specs / Old Specs TEXT B A5. What does Bill Bryson say about American attitudes to disasters?
Refer to the language he uses in your response AWRT / New Specs / Old Specs But in reality…..
• We were adding things
• We had added a few starter without thinking about how AWRT style questions they should be taught.
• We were beginning to look
• Children didn’t have the for more non fiction strategies to cope with the material to work alongside more demanding non the existing fiction texts we fiction material and follow had complex arguments.
• We had begun to think • We couldn’t `see` why they about adding in more `non were getting questions wrong.
continuous texts` How we are getting ready….
Explicitly teaching the thinking processes metacognition
•noun, Psychology 1.higher-order thinking that enables understanding, analysis, and control of one’s cognitive processes, especially when engaged in learning.
It’s a bit like `showing the working out` in numeracy. Unless you `see` their workings out you don’t know where they have gone wrong, their thought processes and how to intervene to support them.
What the Welsh Assembly Government say...
“Developing thinking can be defined as developing patterns of ideas that help learners acquire deeper understanding and enable them to explore and make sense of their world. It refers to processes of thinking that we in Wales have defined as plan, develop and reflect.
These processes enable learners to think creatively and critically to plan their work, carry out tasks, analyse and evaluate their findings, and to reflect on their learning, making links within and outside school. Although we are born with a capability to think there is ample evidence that we can learn to think more effectively. Developing thinking pedagogy has considerable overlap with the principles of assessment for learning.” What the Welsh Assembly Government say...
• a greater focus on how to learn, i.e. the process of learning, than on what to learn, i.e. the subject knowledge and skills
• learners are frequently required to verbalise and to articulate their thinking/learning so that the processes are made more explicit and visible in the classroom
• learners and teachers have a common language of learning
• a focus on group collaboration and co-operation, with teachers facilitating learning
• learners support each others’ efforts to learn and jointly construct their learning
• learners take responsibility for their own learning and make informed decisions
• learners reflect, monitor and self-evaluate their own progress
• learners are encouraged to transfer their learning across contexts and to make connections
• the environment is sensitive, constructive and reflective so that learners feel safe to make mistakes.
What the Welsh Assembly Government say...
• Intelligence is modifiable therefore every learner can improve.
• Deep understanding is more important than superficial learning
• Learners need explicit strategies for how to learn
• Challenge and interest can lead to motivation.
• All participation is valued.