WWW.DISSERTATION.XLIBX.INFO
FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Dissertations, online materials
 
<< HOME
CONTACTS



Pages:   || 2 | 3 |

«NATIONAL HYDRO-VAC INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, L.L.C PLAINTIFF VS. AP NO. 5:01-ap-5016 FEDERAL SIGNAL CORPORATION; GUZZLER MANUFACTURING, INC. DEFENDANTS ...»

-- [ Page 1 ] --

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

PINE BLUFF DIVISION

IN RE: NATIONAL HYDRO-VAC CASE NO. 5:01-bk-50466M

INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, L.L.C., CHAPTER 7

Debtor.

NATIONAL HYDRO-VAC INDUSTRIAL

SERVICES, L.L.C PLAINTIFF VS. AP NO. 5:01-ap-5016

FEDERAL SIGNAL CORPORATION;

GUZZLER MANUFACTURING, INC. DEFENDANTS

TRANSAMERICA EQUIPMENT FINANCIAL

SERVICES CORPORATION INTERVENER

MEMORANDUM OPINION

National Hydro-Vac Industrial Services, L.L.C. (“Debtor”) petitioned for relief under the provisions of Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code on March 15, 2001. On April 3, 2001, the Debtor filed a complaint against Federal Signal Corporation (“Federal Signal”) for the turnover of three specially manufactured pieces of equipment or the proceeds from the sale of the units in the sum of $188,000.00.

Transamerica Equipment Financial Services Corporation (“Transamerica”) filed a complaint in intervention on June 26, 2001, alleging that it held perfected security interests in the three units in question, which were allegedly sold by Federal Signal. Transamerica asserted a lien in the sale proceeds held by Federal Signal.

On June 27, 2001, the Debtor’s complaint was amended to add Guzzler Manufacturing, Inc.

1 (“Guzzler”), a subsidiary corporation of Federal Signal, as a party defendant. The amended complaint alleged conversion and breach of fiduciary duty on the part of both defendants. The amended complaint asked for the turnover of the sale proceeds of the units in question pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 542, damages resulting from conversion of the property, punitive damages, attorney’s fees, and costs.

Federal Signal’s answer to the original complaint denied that it had any property of the Debtor and asserted that the equipment in question had been sold prior to the date the bankruptcy petition was filed. Federal Signal filed an answer to Transamerica’s complaint in intervention, alleging that it lacked knowledge of Transamerica’s rights. On July 13, 2001, Federal Signal and Guzzler answered the first amended complaint, denying the allegations and asserting a right of setoff.

Subsequently, the case was converted to Chapter 7 on July 20, 2001, and William S.

Meeks was appointed Trustee. After the conversion, the Trustee assumed the Debtor’s cause of action.

Trial on the merits was held in Little Rock, Arkansas, on January 29, 2004, and the matter was taken under advisement to review the evidence and briefs. This Court has jurisdiction in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1334 and § 157. This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157 (b)(2)(E) (2000), and this Court may enter a final judgment in this case. The following shall constitute the Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 7052.

–  –  –

The Debtor is an Arkansas limited liability company formed at Pine Bluff, Arkansas, and later headquartered in the Houston, Texas, area. (Tr. at 105.) At some point in time prior to spring

–  –  –

John Stafford, the Used Equipment and Service Sales Manager of Guzzler in 2000, was called as a witness by the Trustee. He testified that sometime in early 2000 (at least a year prior to the bankruptcy filing), he was contacted by Guzzler’s New Equipment Sales Manager about a possible transaction whereby the Debtor would transfer three pieces of used equipment in exchange for the purchase of one new one. (Tr. at 13.) Stafford expressed interest in the transaction but wanted to inspect the equipment. As a result, the equipment was transported to Birmingham, Alabama, for inspection. The inspection was conducted at some time prior to April and was satisfactory. He said the New Equipment Sales Manager subsequently “proceeded with a deal to trade three in for one new one.” (Tr. at 15.) Stafford began contacting customers to resell three units. He stated, “In the process of our contact, we started to refurbish the vacuum equipment and make lists and that sort of thing to decide what needed to be done to the equipment so that it could be sold.” (Tr. at 16.) Guzzler reached an agreement with Vac-Tech, a company located in Australia, and entered into a written contract to sell two of the units at issue to Vac-Tech. The sale and delivery were completed by August 2000. The purchase price for each of the units was $110,000.00.

Stafford testified that the original trade-in deal with the Debtor fell through and subsequently Guzzler reached an agreement with the Debtor to sell two of the units to Guzzler for $65,000.00 each. Stafford never testified as to exactly when the oral agreement to sell the units

–  –  –

for $75,000.00 when they [sic] agreement was made on the first unit. That’s when we agreed to take the three trades for one. I made the Bills of Sale somewhere in that time frame.” (Tr. at 81.) Stafford stated that he listed $75,000.00 as the purchase price in the two bills of sale even though the true sale price was $65,000.00. This was done, he said, to conceal the real selling price. Stafford stated after the sales from the Debtor to Guzzler were completed, Guzzler determined to exercise its right of set off and credited the sale price against the Debtor’s account with Guzzler.





Robert Racic, a former employee of Federal Signal, was called as a witness by the Debtor.

He acknowledged that the Debtor’s account with Federal Signal Leasing maintained on behalf of Guzzler was credited in the amount of $97,973.32 in November 2000 and, at that point, there was still a balance of $97,803.44 that was past due.1 This credit was applied from the proceeds of the sale of the two units to Vac-Tech. He acknowledged he received the $110,000.00 purchase price per unit from Vac-Tech June 21, 2000, but the credit to the Debtor’s account of $97,973.32 did not occur until November 1, 2000. The Debtor’s separate account with Guzzler was credited in the amount of $32,026.68. (Pl.’s Ex. 5.) Thus, the Debtor received a total of $130,000.00 in credit toward various accounts owed to Federal Signal and Guzzler.

The relevant events were recalled by the Debtor’s former President, Raymond Pascale.

He testified that after the Debtor purchased some tractor-mounted vacuum units, he had asked Guzzler to inspect the equipment. The two units later sold to Vac-Tech and other units were 1 Federal Signal is the parent company of Guzzler, and Federal Signal Leasing operates some financial and bookkeeping functions for Guzzler, the exact nature of which is unclear.

–  –  –

or June 2000, and asked if Pascale would be willing to sell two trailer-mounted vacuum units.

(Tr. at 107.) The units were encumbered by a lien securing a debt to Transamerica. After some negotiation, Pascale indicated a willingness to sell the units for $75,000.00 each and Stafford agreed to that price.

Stafford prepared two bills of sale for each of the units, both dated August 1, 2000, and forwarded them to Pascale. (See Pl.’s Exs. 17, 18.) The bills of sale reflected the Debtor as the seller and Guzzler as the buyer. (Tr. at 109.) The stated purchase price was $75,000.00 for each unit.

Pascale signed both bills of sale as representative of the Debtor and returned them to Stafford around August 1, 2000. Pascale testified that Transamerica had been granted a lien in the 80 units purchased from Freemyer by the Debtor, and a “certain value” had been assigned to each of the units. (Tr. at 110.) From the proceeds of the sale of the two units, Pascale intended to pay some or all of the indebtedness owed on each unit to Transamerica. He stated $75,000.00 for each of the units sold to Guzzler would be “a bit short” in defraying the indebtedness to Transamerica. (Tr. at 110.) The Debtor never received any of the proceeds from the sale of the two units to Guzzler.

Pascale testified that he never authorized Guzzler or Federal Signal to setoff or credit the sale proceeds against the Debtor’s obligation to Guzzler or Federal Signal. He stated he was surprised when the Debtor’s account with Guzzler was credited rather than the proceeds being sent to the Debtor. (Tr. at 114.) Pascale did not testify when payment was due from Guzzler to the Debtor, except he stated that he expected to receive $150,000.00 after he signed the two bills of sale. (Tr.

at 110.)

–  –  –

Pascale also testified about the sale of the third unit. The third unit was apparently transported to Guzzler’s facility in Alabama at the same time as the other two units that were sold to Vac-Tech. Pascale stated that before any inspection or refurbishing was authorized, he received a call from Stafford asking if he would sell the unit for $58,000.00 and Pascale agreed. He stated that he was not certain who the buyer was. He said he intended to pay off Transamerica with the sale proceeds but he never received any proceeds from Guzzler.

Stafford testified that Guzzler was acting as a broker for the Debtor to sell the third unit to Ace Pipe. Exhibit 13 contained an inter-company message confirming the details of the transaction

as follows:

The unit was sold to Ace Pipe for $62,500.00. Of these proceeds, $4,500 was to be retained by Guzzler and the remaining $58,000.00 sent to National Hydro-Vac.

However, with the status of National Hydro-Vac a memo from corporate was initiated which requested that the proceeds be applied to the outstanding invoices (which had previously been charged off in August) of National Hydro-Vac.

Plaintiff’s Exhibit 13, Document 7, Message dated September 20, 2001.

Stafford identified the certificate of title to the third unit reflecting a lien in favor of Transamerica dated March 1, 2001. (Pl.’s Ex. 3.) Guzzler received $62,500.00 from Ace Pipe on December 26, 2000. Plaintiff’s Exhibit 13 contains accounting records of Vactor (another subsidiary of Federal Signal that handles accounting for Guzzler). The exhibit shows receipt of $62,500.00 from Ace Pipe. The record reflects the proceeds were not paid to the Debtor but instead were applied to bad debt reserve in the amount of $19,210.00 and transferred intercompany in the amount of $43,290.00 to “Guzzler Federal Signal Leasing account for National Hydro-Vac’s outstanding balances.” (Pl.’s Ex. 13, document 7.) The disbursement was accomplished and noted on the company books on October 5, 2001. (See Pl.’s Ex. 13, document 9,

–  –  –

Stafford acknowledged that the proceeds of the sale to Ace were disbursed between the two accounts in October 2001 and that the disbursement was made with knowledge of the pending bankruptcy case. Exhibit 10 contains a bill of sale evidencing the sale of the third unit from Guzzler to Ace on December 18, 2000, for $62,500.00. Stafford agreed that the third unit was sold to Ace before receipt of the bill of sale from the Debtor to Guzzler. (Tr. at 76.)

–  –  –

The Trustee argues that Guzzler is liable for the tort of conversion because the evidence shows that when Guzzler received funds from Vac-Tech, Guzzler did not immediately pay the Debtor. The Trustee reasons that, pursuant to state law, Guzzler is not entitled to setoff a debt against a judgment for conversion.

Second, the Trustee argues that when Guzzler received the proceeds from the sale of two units to Vac-Tech in June or July 2000, Guzzler’s maximum right of setoff was $32,026.68. Third, the Trustee contends that the right of setoff does not exist because the debts were not mutual since some of the funds were transferred inter-company to Federal Signal, an entity that was not a creditor of the Debtor. The Trustee’s fourth argument is that Guzzler was acting in a fiduciary capacity as agent of a principal, that it breached its duty by failing to turn over the sale proceeds from the sale of the units, and that damages of $282,500.00 resulted. Additionally, the Trustee asks for punitive damages to punish the Defendants for their actions.

The final argument is that the setoff of the proceeds from the sale of the third unit to Ace occurred post-petition in violation of sections 362 and 549 of the Bankruptcy Code and should be set aside as void. Because of the violation of the automatic stay, the Trustee contends that sanctions should be imposed on Guzzler.

–  –  –

Debtor and that the Debtor has not been damaged by the setoff. While acknowledging that the setoff of the sale proceeds of the third unit to Ace may have violated the automatic stay, Guzzler states that it should now be permitted to accomplish the setoff.

The Defendant, Federal Signal, argues it should be dismissed from the lawsuit because all decisions were made by Guzzler. The Defendants also deny that they converted the Debtor’s property and state that punitive damages are not justified and have been waived by the Debtor’s invoking of the bankruptcy court’s equitable jurisdiction.

As to the complaint in intervention, the Defendants argue that Transamerica presented no evidence of its security interest in the three units in question.

–  –  –

Transamerica alleges in its complaint in intervention that it held a perfected security interest and claims a lien in the three units. Brian DeRusha of Transamerica testified that Transamerica never received any funds from Guzzler and never released its lien in the three units.

Pascale testified that the Debtor purchased 80 units from the Freemeyer Company and Transamerica financed the entire purchase. The three units in question, all made by Guzzler, were part of the acquisition.



Pages:   || 2 | 3 |


Similar works:

«COPYRIGHT NOTICE: Theodore Ziolkowski: The Sin of Knowledge is published by Princeton University Press and copyrighted, © 2000, by Princeton University Press. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from the publisher, except for reading and browsing via the World Wide Web. Users are not permitted to mount this file on any...»

«SUBHRAJIT BHATTACHARYA Postdoctoral Researcher Department of Mathematics, University of Pennsylvania Room 3C7, 209 South 33rd Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104. phone: (001) 267-252-6638 • e-mail: subhrabh@math.upenn.edu • web: http://hans.math.upenn.edu/∼subhrabh/ PERSONAL INFORMATION Year of Birth: 1983 Country of Citizenship: India Marital Status: Married EDUCATION M.S. and Ph.D., Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics (January 2012) University of Pennsylvania, USA. Ph.D....»

«Pour citer cet article : LE BRETON, D. « Concepts et significations majeures des conduites à risque », Journal des socio-anthropologues de l'adolescence et de la jeunesse, Revue en-ligne. Date de publication : janvier 2012. [http://anthropoado.com/le-journal-des-socio-anthropologues-de-l-adolescence-et-de-lajeunesse-textes-en-ligne/] Concepts et significations majeures des conduites à risque Par David Le Breton Significations des conduites à risque Paradoxalement les conduites à risque...»

«Chapter 3 Glaucoma The Eyes Have It by Tim Root Is that one Due to budget cuts in mine? the ophtho department, all our white coats will No, be marked with sorry. corporate logos. I’m afraid Nike, Would you prefer Reebok, and Adidas Viagra, Valtrex, have already been or Monistat-7? claimed by the senior doctors. Crud! What’s left? Introduction to Glaucoma by Tim Root, M.D. Glaucoma is a disease where the optic nerve dies. We are not sure why or how this happens (there are many mechanical,...»

«INDUSTRIAL DYNAMICS AND THE EVOLUTION OF FIRMS= AND NATIONS= COMPETITIVE CAPABILITIES IN THE WORLD COMPUTER INDUSTRY Timothy Bresnahan* and Franco Malerba** * Stanford University, USA ** University of Brescia and CESPRI, Bocconi University, Italy April 1997 We would like to thank Salvatore Torrisi for sharing with us his knowledge about the U.K. industry; Simona Heidemperger, Lu-Leng Chua, and Victoria Danilchouk for much assistance, and David Mowery, Richard Nelson, Richard Rosenbloom,...»

«3 Whose Apple Is It Anyway! Copyright © 2014 Linda F. Williams. All rights reserved. No portion of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means — electronic, mechanical, photocopy, recording, scanning, or other — except for brief quotations in critical reviews or articles, or as specifically allowed by the U. S. Copyright Act of 1976, as amended, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Published by Whose Apple Press...»

«CURRICULUM VITAE YITZHAK FRIED Work Address: Home Address: Management Department 10 D Kings Court Whitman School of Management Camillus, NY 13031 Syracuse University Phone: 315-487-1264 Phone: (315) 443-3639 E-mail: yfried@syr.edu Education Ph.D. Institute of Labor and Industrial Relations, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1985 M.A. Tel Aviv University (Israel), 1979 B.A. Bar-Ilan University (Israel), 1976 Work Experience August 2004presentProfessor, Management Department, Whitman...»

«POLITECNICO DI MILANO DEPARTMENT OF CHEMISTRY, MATERIALS AND CHEMICAL ENGINEERING “GIULIO NATTA” DOCTORAL PROGRAMME IN INDUSTRIAL CHEMISTRY AND CHEMICAL ENGINEERING AMINOAND GUANIDINOGLYCOSIDE-BASED VECTORS FOR GENE AND DRUG DELIVERY Doctoral Dissertation of: Aurora Sganappa I.D. 802585 Supervisor: Prof. Alessandro Volonterio The Chair of the Doctoral Program: Prof. Frassoldati Alessio 2012-2015 XXVIII Cycle “Every time you decide, there is a loss, no matter how you decide. It is always a...»

«IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IOSR-JMCE) e-ISSN: 2278-1684,p-ISSN: 2320-334X, Volume 12, Issue 2 Ver. VI (Mar Apr. 2015), PP 34-41 www.iosrjournals.org Ductility of Outrigger Typologies for Highrise Structures MSc. Rafael Shehu Post graduated student, School Fratelli Pesenti, Polytechnic University of Milan, Italy Abstract: This research paper focuses on aspects of the building performance designed or retrofited by means of conventional or virtual Outriggers. The purpose of...»

«Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2015 The human brain response to dental pain relief Meier, M L; Widmayer, S; Abazi, J; Brügger, M; Lukic, N; Lüchinger, R; Ettlin, D A Abstract: Local anesthesia has made dental treatment more comfortable since 1884, but little is known about associated brain mechanisms. Functional magnetic resonance imaging is a modern neuroimaging tool widely used for investigating...»

«About the Authors Christina Amcoff Nyström is presently an Assistant Professor in Informatics at Mid Sweden University, Sweden. She is sharing her professional interests between tutoring master courses and researching technical communication, including communication in organizations and virtual collaboration among project members. Hans Andersin was born in 1930. In 1954-1955 he took part in building the first electronic computer in Finland. In 1956 he joined IBM and worked in various sales,...»

«Mach Learn (2007) 68: 1–33 DOI 10.1007/s10994-007-5006-x Discovering Significant Patterns Geoffrey I. Webb Received: 23 May 2005 / Revised: 13 February 2007 / Accepted: 14 February 2007 / Published online: 14 April 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007 Abstract Pattern discovery techniques, such as association rule discovery, explore large search spaces of potential patterns to find those that satisfy some user-specified constraints. Due to the large number of patterns considered,...»





 
<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.dissertation.xlibx.info - Dissertations, online materials

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.