WWW.DISSERTATION.XLIBX.INFO
FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Dissertations, online materials
 
<< HOME
CONTACTS



Pages:   || 2 |

«Published: 31 March 2015 AMP6 OUTCOMES REPORTING POLICY ANNEX 3 – THAMES TIDEWAY TUNNEL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENTS Contents Introduction T1A – ...»

-- [ Page 1 ] --

Thames Water

AMP6 Outcomes Reporting

Policy

Annex 3 – Thames Tideway

Tunnel

Performance Commitments

March 2015

Published: 31 March 2015

AMP6 OUTCOMES REPORTING POLICY

ANNEX 3 – THAMES TIDEWAY TUNNEL

PERFORMANCE COMMITMENTS

Contents

Introduction

T1A – Successful procurement of the Infrastructure Provider

T1B – Thames Water will fulfil its land related commitments in line with the TTT programme requirements

T1C – Completion of category 2 and 3 construction works and timely availability of sites to the IP………... ………………………………………………………………………………………………...3 T2 – Thames Water will engage effectively with IP, and other stakeholders, both in terms of integration and assurance

T3 – Thames Water will engage with its customers to build understanding of the TTT project.

Thames Water will liaise with the IP on its surveys of local communities impacted by construction

Glossary of terms

Tables Table 1: Individual parcels of land required in line with the current programme

Table 2: T1C performance commitment and outcome delivery incentive (ODI)

AMP6 OUTCOMES REPORTING POLICY

ANNEX 3 – THAMES TIDEWAY TUNNEL

PERFORMANCE COMMITMENTS

Introduction In the PR14 Final Determination (PR14 FD), Thames Water has three performance

commitments relating to the Thames Tideway Tunnel (TTT) project and price control:

 T1 – Thames Water will limit the extent of delays on the overall programme timeline T1A – Successful procurement of the Infrastructure Provider (IP);

o T1B – Thames Water will fulfil its land related commitments in line with the TTT o programme requirements;

T1C – Completion of category 2 and 3 construction works and timely availability o of sites to the IP;

 T2 – Thames Water will engage effectively with the IP, and other stakeholders, both in terms of integration and assurance; and  T3 – Thames Water will engage with its customers to build understanding of the TTT project. Thames Water will liaise with the IP on its surveys of local communities impacted by construction.

This document sets out further detail on how we will report and measure against these three performance commitments. It also sets out the activities we are undertaking to finalise the measurement and reporting arrangements for performance commitments T2 and T3.

This is a technical document aimed at providing Ofwat, our Customer Challenge Group (CCG) and other stakeholders with additional detail on the measurement and reporting for the TTT performance commitments. We do not repeat the descriptions of the performance commitments from our PR14 FD.1 This appendix should be read in conjunction with the main policy document. The policy documents sets out our approach to audit and assurance, including method statements, data checks, the use of independent assessors and review by our CCG. Details of our engagement with the CCG to provide additional challenge on our performance are included in Section 3.3 of the main policy document.

1 Ofwat, “Final price control determination notice: company-specific appendix - Thames Water”, December 2014, page 251+

–  –  –

T1A – Successful procurement of the Infrastructure Provider Thames Water is leading the procurement of the IP. The Performance Commitment requires that the company successfully procures the IP according to the project timetable. The current timetable anticipates that the IP will be awarded its licence by Ofwat on 31 July 2015.

We are liaising closely with both Ofwat and Government on the procurement by Thames Water of the IP. We will make a public statement on conclusion of the procurement.

T1B – Thames Water will fulfil its land related commitments in line with the TTT programme requirements We will monitor and report on the acquisition of land and access rights, and will publish our performance against this commitment on our website.

In line with our PR14 FD, we are setting out the financial years in which access is first required to the parcels of land relating to the 24 project sites.

Table 1 sets out the dates under the current programme timetable, which is consistent with the DCO. We note, however, that the timetable will change as the land acquisition requirements dates are set by the programme and specifically the timing of capital works as set out in the Works Schedule. The programme will be updated during the Optimised Contractor Involvement (OCI) period which will run post licence award. As such, we will update the land right schedule in Table 1.

Table 1: Individual parcels of land required in line with the current programme

–  –  –

As stated in our Representation on Ofwat’s Draft Determinations, we define land acquisitions as any sites/rights acquired by negotiation and any sites acquired, on a temporary or permanent basis2, by use of powers under the DCO. Compulsory Purchase Orders (CPOs), where required, will also be included in the Land Schedule.





To protect customers’ interests by not impairing our ability to secure sights at appropriate prices, when reporting performance we will not publish an acquisition schedule with individual property information or the forecast/actual cost of any acquisition or compensation.

As stated in our Representation the circa 1200 sub soil interests will not be listed line by line.

It should be noted that the Land Schedule will be dependent on the TTT Works Schedule which is currently subject to change as it undergoes a process of optimisation.

2 All rights under the DCO are temporary rights. The extent to which such temporary access will become permanent will be determined later and compulsory purchases take place in AMP7.

–  –  –

We have strong incentives, in the form of Performance Commitment T1C and our Alliance Agreement, to ensure that land acquisition does not delay our Works Schedule. Land costs are no pain / no gain, ensuring the best value is in the best interest of our customers. Securing the best price may impact the timing of land acquisitions, provided there is no effect on the overall programme. Where this occurs we will indicate the cause of the delay and explain the reasons behind any adjustments.

Reporting To ensure continued transparency we will publish annual updates to our land acquisitions schedule on the Thames Tideway Tunnel website. This information will be consistent with that set out in Table 1.

There will be a continuation of the AMP5 regulatory oversight arrangements with Ofwat, as provisionally agreed with Ofwat at a meeting on 3 February 2015. For transactions greater than £1m, there will be engagement and agreement with Ofwat and its advisor (currently Mott MacDonald), through “no objection” letters to business cases and regular updates, either quarterly or half-yearly.

T1C – Completion of category 2 and 3 construction works and timely availability of sites to the IP We are undertaking construction works (known as Category 2 and 3) to support the delivery of the TTT. T1C requires completion of Category 2 and 3 construction works and timely availability of the project’s 24 sites to the IP. The performance commitment includes financial penalties for delays in the availability of sites to the IP.

Table 2 below includes the availability dates for each of the 24 sites from the PR14 FD. We will continue to monitor internally against this schedule until the final baseline has been set.

The final baseline for the performance commitment will be the dates agreed following the OCI phase3 and included in the Baseline Project Master Programme. As an observer of the project’s Liaison Committee, Ofwat will receive these dates. Ofwat has agreed that variations to this programme will not adjust the performance commitment dates without prior agreement with Ofwat.

3 This was confirmed in an email exchange with Ofwat on 8 January 2015.

–  –  –

Any potential penalties which arise will be calculated annually and applied to the total five-year position in 2015-20. The delay penalty will apply to any site which is handed over in a later financial year to that in which it was committed to in the Baseline Project Master Programme agreed at the end of the OCI Period. The granting of access to the IP and the acknowledgement of acceptance will be confirmed through both parties signing and dating an agreed certificate.

The Alliance Agreement incentivises Thames Water to deliver this programme efficiently and in line with the final programme. Ofwat specified in its PR14 FD that any site-specific penalties for delays incurred in the period 2015-16 to 2019-20 in relation to the Alliance Agreement may be netted off against the penalty incurred through the performance commitment, subject to sufficient regulatory oversight.

We will engage with Ofwat and other key stakeholders on the signed version of the Alliance Agreement to ensure that it meets their requirements.

Exception Ofwat indicated in its PR14 FD that its intention was to recover costs for customers in the event of non-delivery of Category 2 and 3 (Cat 2/3) works if Thames Water does not undertake the project, in circumstances where the work is cancelled for reasons outside Thames Water’s control. We have assumed in these circumstances that the penalties would not be applied. If the same circumstances result in a material delay rather than complete cancellation, the penalties would also be waived. Examples are if the project is de-specified, the IP loses its Licence or as a result of a Force Majeure event.

Reporting

To allow customers and stakeholders to effectively monitor the delivery of T1C, we will publish details on the delivery of this performance commitment on an annual basis. We will set out the Cat 2/3 activities by year and provide further site-specific details where appropriate. As this performance commitment relates to timely delivery of the construction activities, specific cost information will not be included.

Page 4

AMP6 OUTCOMES REPORTING POLICY

ANNEX 3 – THAMES TIDEWAY TUNNEL

PERFORMANCE COMMITMENTS

As a member of the Alliance, Thames Water will report the performance of the Cat 2/3 programme regularly to the Alliance Board and the Liaison Committee. As per the Liaison Agreement, the Independent Technical Assessor will provide assurance over information reported to the Liaison Committee to ensure accurate data is reported.

T2 – Thames Water will engage effectively with IP, and other stakeholders, both in terms of integration and assurance Thames Water and the IP will need to work effectively together to achieve a successful outcome for the project. We will need to work closely with the IP, and other stakeholders, including through the Liaison Committee, to seek to deliver the activities on a timely and efficient basis.

We will engage with all the relevant parties, including the IP, in an approach that is effective and reflects their views. We are continuing to develop the approach to engagement. To ensure a strong stakeholder strategy, the development phase will include stakeholder mapping, analysis of the different types of interaction with our key stakeholders and development and implementation of methods of interaction, e.g. forums, meetings and communication channels.

Once our development phase is complete, we will establish an approach to measuring the effectiveness of the stakeholder engagement, including the establishment of a baseline against which we can measure and report performance. This will be developed in collaboration with the TTT Ltd to ensure that our incentives are aligned and that we only approach our mutual stakeholders, such as Ofwat and Defra, with common communication messages.

The measurement of engagement will be defined once the stakeholder engagement strategy is confirmed in order to minimise the risk of inappropriate measurement and/or targets driving unintended behaviours that are not to the benefit of the project or our customers.

We will develop a standard approach to quantify the success of our engagement with

stakeholders. This approach will consider:

–  –  –

Reporting We will propose to stakeholders that we would commission an independent company to survey the key stakeholders, including the IP, to assess effective engagement on an annual basis.

Performance against our commitment will be reported in line with our year-end reporting processes. Monitoring against this measure will commence from the date of IP award. We will inform the CCG of our approach through quarterly updates in line with the reporting framework set out in the main policy document.

We recognise that as this performance commitment is still being developed, we will continue to engage our stakeholders in the development phase and will provide a final update to Ofwat on our agreed measurement and reporting approach prior to IP Licence Award.

–  –  –

T3 – Thames Water will engage with its customers to build understanding of the TTT project. Thames Water will liaise with the IP on its surveys of local communities impacted by construction We will undertake a programme of ongoing engagement with customers and collaborate with water-only companies to understand and measure customers’ views and to build an understanding of the TTT. The company will also liaise with the IP in relation to its surveys of communities impacted by the IP's construction sites.

It is important to ensure that we have an agreed approach with water only companies (WoCs) and that CCG has been effectively engaged. We will engage with the CCG on the programme of customer research and engagement throughout the AMP. We are defining the process and beginning the engagement activities with these parties.



Pages:   || 2 |


Similar works:

«W.J. Usery Workplace Research Group Paper Series Working Paper 2008-10-1 October 2008 Why Are Smart Cities Growing? Who Moves and Who Stays John V. Winters Georgia State University This paper can be downloaded at: http://aysps.gsu.edu/uwrg-research.html ANDREW YOUNG SCHOOL OF POLICY STUDIES Why Are Smart Cities Growing? Who Moves and Who Stays John V. Winters* October 8, 2008 Abstract This paper examines why smart cities are growing by exploring the relationship between the college share in a...»

«Paper prepared for presentation at the Annual Convention of the International Studies Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, March 16–19, 2011. Pandemonium in Silico: Individual Radicalization for Agent-Based Modeling Claudio Cioffi-Revilla and Joseph F. Harrison Center for Social Complexity and Department of Computational Social Science Krasnow Institute for Advanced Study, George Mason University Fairfax, VA 22030 USA Abstract. How do individuals become radicalized, turning into terrorists,...»

«i Land, Water and Local People: A Case Study of Bangalore Mysore Infrastructure Corridor Submitted by Atul Vikas Kulkarni A dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Habitat Policy and Practice School of Habitat Studies Tata Institute of Social Sciences Mumbai 2012 ii DECLARATION I, Atul Vikas Kulkarni, hereby declare that this dissertation entitled ‘Land, Water and Local People: A case study of Bangalore Mysore Infrastructure...»

«Jus Post Bellum GARY J. BASS The just war tradition usually revolves around two crucial points: the justness of a war, and the justness of the way that war is fought. These two points—jus ad bellum and jus in bello, respectively—define the debate over whether a war is moral. Much less has been said about what happens after a war. But the aftermath of war is crucial to the justice of the war itself. Political leaders often invoke postwar developments like bringing democracy or stability as...»

«Individuals and the Significance of Affect: Foreign Policy Variation in the Middle East Brent E. Sasley Department of Political Science McGill University, Montreal November 2006 A thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfillment ofthe requirements of the degree of Doctor ofPhilosophy (Ph.D.) © Copyright Brent E. Sasley, 2006 Library and Bibliothèque et 1+1 Archives Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de l'édition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue...»

«David Schwartz Head of Global Policy Cigna Federal Affairs June 22, 2015 601 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW VIA ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION TO http://www.chronic_care@finance.senate.gov Suite 835, South Building Washington, DC 20004 (202) 719-6499 The Honorable Johnny Isakson David.Schwartz@Cigna.com United States Senate 131 Russell Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510 The Honorable Mark Warner United States Senate 475 Russell Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510 Dear Senators Isakson and...»

«CHAPTER 4. PERSONALISED LEARNING AND CHANGING CONCEPTIONS OF CHILDHOOD AND YOUTH – 63 Chapter 4 Personalised Learning and Changing Conceptions of Childhood and Youth by Yvonne Hébert and William J. Hartley∗ Hébert and Hartley take the example of Canada as indicative of changing conceptions of youth that occur through societies, shaped by moral, socio-economic, political and legal influences. These include the appearance of a more liberal Christianity, the growth of industrial and...»

«Software Manufacturer Liability KENNETH GEERS PANDEMONIUM: NATION STATES, NATIONAL SECURITY, AND THE INTERNET Vol. 1, No. 1 2014 Disclaimer This publication is a product of the NATO Cooperative Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence (the Centre). It does not necessarily reflect the policy or the opinion of the Centre or NATO. The Centre may not be held responsible for any loss or harm arising from the use of information contained in this publication and is not responsible for the content of the...»

«VERNON'S CIVIL STATUTES TITLE 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS Art. 30. REVISED STATUTES CITED. These Revised Civil Statutes shall be known and may be cited as the Revised Statutes. Acts 1925, S.B. 84. TITLE 4. AGRICULTURE AND HORTICULTURE CHAPTER 11. COTTON Art. 165-4. COTTON RESEARCH AWARD FUND. Sec. 1. By this Act it is expressly declared to be a State policy that the encouragement and stimulation of new uses for cotton shall be a matter of State-wide importance and concern and that the various...»

«Great Narratives of the Past. Traditions and Revisions in National Museums Conference proceedings from EuNaMus, European National Museums: Identity Politics, the Uses of the Past and the European Citizen, Paris 29 June – 1 July & 25-26 November 2011. Dominique Poulot, Felicity Bodenstein & José María Lanzarote Guiral (eds) EuNaMus Report No 4. Published by Linköping University Electronic Press: http://www.ep.liu.se/ecp_home/index.en.aspx?issue=078 © The Author. Freedom Loving Northerners:...»

«2011 Global Microcredit Summit Commissioned Workshop Paper November 14-17, 2011 – Valladolid, Spain Ultra Poor Graduation Pilots: Spanning the gap between charity and microfinance Written by: Nathanael Goldberg, Senior Policy Director Innovations for Poverty Action, USA Arielle Salomon, Policy Associate Innovations for Poverty Action, USA TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction History of Ultra Poor Graduation Pilots Graduation Model Implementation Randomized Evaluation Preliminary Results Conclusion...»

«SOCIAL THOUGHT & COMMENTARY Being Alone Together: From Solidarity to Solitude in Urban Anthropology Leo Coleman The Ohio State University Abstract The characteristic urban experience of solitude challenges traditional anthropological theories of urban life. This article surveys urban theories that treat solitude primarily as loneliness, anomie, and social disorder. It then challenges these theoretical perspectives with ethnographic cases of gay identities and “being alone together,” drawn...»





 
<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.dissertation.xlibx.info - Dissertations, online materials

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.