FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Dissertations, online materials

Pages:   || 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |   ...   | 33 |

«Sponsored by World Policy Institute Puentes Cubanos Cuban Committee for Democracy Fundación Amistad The Time is Now Coalition Cambio Cubano ...»

-- [ Page 1 ] --

National Summit on Cuba

October 4, 2003

A Compendium of Commentary

Sponsored by

World Policy Institute

Puentes Cubanos

Cuban Committee for Democracy

Fundación Amistad

The Time is Now Coalition

Cambio Cubano

Americans For Humanitarian Trade With Cuba

The National Summit on Cuba Compendium

 Cuba Project, World Policy Institute



1 Cosponsoring Organizations

2 Supporting, Individuals, Organizations and Staff

3 Overview in the Context of Events of 2003 6 Introductory Remarks: Lissa Weinmann, Project Director, Cuba Project, World Policy Institute 7 Open Letter to the National Summit On Cuba: President Jimmy Carter 8 Points of View from the New Generation of Cuban-Americans Moderator: Silvia Wilhelm, Puentes Cubanos 9 Elizabeth Cerejido, Exhibitions Coordinator, Florida International University Art Museum 11 José Latour, Immigration Attorney, Journalist, Musician, Former U.S. Diplomatic Officer 13 Cynthia Barrera, Ph.D. Candidate, University of Miami School of International Studies Producer of Maria Elvira Confronta 15 Mayda Prego, Attorney, Hughes, Hubbard & Reed, Miami 16 Questions and Answers: The New Generation 18 Florida - A Changing Political Equation?

Moderator: Alfredo Duran, Cuban Committee for Democracy 18 Pat Collier Frank, Hillsborough County Commissioner 20 Kenneth Lipner, Ph.D., Department of Economics, University of Miami, former Economic Development Coordinator for Miami’s Downtown Development Authority 22 Joe McClash, Manatee County Commissioner 24 Alvaro Fernández, Florida Director, Southwest Voter Registration Education Project 25 Rob Schroth Schroth & Associates, Pollster for Miami Herald 26 Annie Betancourt, former Florida State Representative (ran for national office against current U.S. Rep. Mario Diaz Balart on a pro-change platform toward Cuba) 28 Questions & Answers: A Changing Political Equation 29 Our National Interest, Our National Security Moderator: Lissa Weinmann, Cuba Project, World Policy Institute 29 General John Sheehan, USMC (Ret.), Former Commander-in-Chief U.S. Atlantic Command, Supreme Allied Commander Atlantic 32 The Hon. William D. Rogers, former Assistant Secretary of State for Inter-American relations (1974-1977), Vice Chair, Kissinger Associates 34 William Ratliff, Ph.D., Research Fellow, Hoover Institution, Stanford University 38 Ken Lindeman, Senior Scientist and Cuba Program Director Environmental Defense 40 Mayor Michael C. Dow, Mobile, Alabama 42 Questions and Answers: Our National Security, Our National Interest 46 The Human Dimensions of U.S. Policy Moderator: Luly Duke, President, Fundación Amistad ii


47 José Miguel Vivanco, Executive Director, Americas Division, Human Rights Watch 50 Holly Ackerman, Amnesty International 51 Robert Bach, Ph.D., Senior Visiting Fellow, Inter-American Dialogue, Former Executive Associate Commissioner for Policy, Planning and Programs, INS 54 Thomas Wenski, Bishop of Orlando, Former Bishop of Miami 56 Donna Hicks, Ph.D., Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Harvard University 57 Peter G. Bourne, M.A., M.D., Chairman, Medical Education Cooperation with Cuba 60 James Early, Ph.D., Director of Cultural Heritage Policy, Smithsonian Institution 62 Questions and Answers: The Human Dimensions of U.S. Policy 64 Impetus for and Implications of Open Travel to Cuba Moderator: Antonio Zamora, The Time is Now Coalition, U.S. Cuba Legal Forum, Bay of Pigs Veteran, Former Counsel to the Cuban American National Foundation 64 U.S. Representative William Delahunt (D-MA) 67 U.S. Representative Jeff Flake (R-AZ) 68 Phil Peters, Vice President, Lexington Institute, former U.S. Department of State Official under President Reagan 70 Bradley Belt, Executive Director, Association of Travel Related Industry Professionals 72 Questions and Answers: Open Travel 74 The U.S., Cuba and the International Community: A Multilateral Perspective Moderator: Patricia Gutiérrez Menoyo, Cambio Cubano 75 Joaquín Roy Ph.D., Jean Monnet Professor, Director of the EU Center, University of Miami 78 John Mcauliff, Executive Director, Fund for Reconciliation and Development 82 The Hon. Mark Entwistle, former Canadian Ambassador to Cuba 84 Questions and Answers: The International Community 85 Closing Remarks Dr. William Leogrande, Ph.D., Dean, School of Public Affairs, American University 87 Mikhail Gorbachev Keynote Address Introduction: Michael Putney, ABC Network News Anchor, Miami 87 Mikhail Gorbachev 94 Questions and Answers 97 Excerpts from Mikhail Gorbachev’s Press Conference 100 Cosponsor Information 108 Biographies of Speakers 130 Editorial: The Last Wall by Mikhail Gorbachev and Selected Press Clips 1

–  –  –


Lissa Weinmann, Summit Coordinator ♦ John Loggia, Assistant Summit and Communications Coordinator Michele Wojcik, Assistant Summit Coordinator ♦ Emily Myers, Summit Intern ♦ Tucker Hall, Public Relations, Tampa, Florida

–  –  –

OVERVIEW IN THE CONTEXT OF EVENTS OF 2003 The National Summit on Cuba: Florida was held at the historic Biltmore Hotel in Coral Gables, Florida on October 4, 2003. Diverse leaders from across the United States convened with Cuban-Americans from South Florida to explore alternative policy approaches to Cuba, in front of an audience of 400 participants. This growing segment of the Cuban-American community in Florida seeks to end the forty-three year political stalemate between the two governments in order to promote national reconciliation and participation in a changing Cuban society.

Chosen for his leadership role in charting a new course for the Soviet Union and the world at large, Mikhail Gorbachev delivered the keynote address at the Summit. Gorbachev shared his personal vision of how to heal a community torn apart by a policy that many view as an anachronistic and a painful legacy of the Cold War. Reflecting on his experience, Gorbachev advocated a new approach of diplomatic and economic engagement with Cuba that would advance U.S. interests and empower Cuban citizens.


The Miami National Summit on Cuba was the second in what has become an annual gathering of American and international leaders from all sectors representing various points of view on U.S. – Cuba relations. The Summits are held in various cities, and organized by the World Policy Institute’s Cuba Project in conjunction with different cosponsors depending on the orientation of the event. The Summits’ guiding mission, whatever the city or roster of cosponsoring organizations is to examine and illuminate how our policy of unilateral economic and diplomatic embargo on neighboring Cuba affects the U.S. economy, our national security, the well-being and human rights of the Cuban people and U.S. leadership internationally, among other areas.

The first Summit, held at Washington DC’s National Press Club in 2002, was cosponsored by the World Policy Institute, the USA Engage Coalition of more than 650 U.S. corporations (many household names) and the American Farm Bureau Federation and Americans For Humanitarian Trade With Cuba. The Summit assembled an impressive ‘grass tops’ array of 44 speakers and delegations from 28 states including elected officials, corporate representatives, port and transportation officials, farmers, local trade groups and chambers of commerce as well as a broad array of human rights and religious leaders. Approximately 400 Cuban Americans participated in the second day of the Summit, organizing various Congressional panels on changes within that important community.

The Florida Summit was meant to inform a policy review the Bush Administration had announced was taking place in 2003. The review came in the wake of a Cuban government crackdown on political dissidents which appeared to arrest a trend toward more political and economic openness on the island.

4 THE CONGRESSIONAL CONTEXT IN 2003 During 2003, tension grew between the Administration and Congress, as well as within the Republican Party itself.

Despite growing bipartisan momentum to lift the ban on U.S. citizens’ ability to travel to Cuba, the Bush administration in 2003 greatly tightened restrictions on legal travel to Cuba by cutting-off all people-to-people exchanges.

Several votes in early September 2003 reflected the House of Representatives support for broad relaxation of the Cuba embargo.

Representative Jeff Flake (R-AZ) sponsored an amendment that would cut the appropriation for the Department of Treasury to enforce the travel ban. That amendment won by a vote of 227-188.

Representative William Delahunt (D-MA) sponsored an amendment that would have prohibited Treasury from enforcing any cap on remittances to Cuba. That amendment passed 222-196.

Representative Jim Davis (D-Tampa) sponsored an amendment that would have restored the people-to-people travel that President Bush had cut earlier that year. The House passed that amendment by a 246 to173 vote.

On October 23, Senator Byron Dorgan (D-SD) introduced the same amendment that passed the house which would, again, have eliminated Treasury’s ability to enforce the travel embargo by withholding the Congressional appropriation to do so. The amendment passed by a 59 to 36 vote. The Senate roll call on that vote is included later in this compendium.

The normal procedure when the Senate and House pass exact language is that it is included in the final bill, and it was fully expected that the Cuba language would therefore be included in the final Treasury Appropriations bill which would then be sent to the President for signature.

Congressional leaders in 2003 summarily removed the Cuba language. The move was widely viewed as a shocking and unusual measure that angered Congressional leaders on both sides of the aisle. It is generally accepted that the leaders did this to avoid sending the bill to the President as he had said he would veto the important spending provision if it contained language that loosened the embargo on Cuba.

–  –  –

THE INTERNATIONAL CONTEXT OF U.S. CUBA POLICY IN 2003 The Summit underscored how the international and human rights community has been caught in the crossfire of U.S.-Cuba politics. While chagrined at the turn of events in Cuba, the international community steadfastly refuses to follow suit with economic isolationism, making any efforts to form a multilateral policy toward Cuba necessarily predicated on U.S. steps toward diplomacy and principled engagement with Cuba.

Polish Solidarity leader Lech Walesa and ‘Velvet Revolution’ head Vaclav Havel in 2003 were joined by other Eastern European leaders in denouncing both the crackdown in Cuba and U.S.

policy toward Cuba.

The two main human rights groups (Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch) spoke at the Summit. They reiterated the view of political dissidents in Cuba in explaining how current U.S policy impedes the cause of political freedom and human rights in Cuba. Both groups called for steps toward diplomatic engagement between the U.S. and Cuba, encouraging the U.S. to take the first step by recognizing American citizens’ human right to travel freely to Cuba.

The Organization of American States refused in early 2003 to entertain a U.S. resolution condemning Cuba for the political crackdown, arguing that the measure was illegal since, because the U.S. bars Cuba’s membership in the OAS, Cuba had no standing therefore no ability to defend itself within the regional body. The U.S. subsequently lost its important seat on the Inter-American Human Rights Commission.

A 2003 resolution from the European Union condemning Cuba’s human rights abuses also condemns U.S. policy toward the island. The United Nations has annually condemned the embargo as an abrogation of international law for 10 years running. The last vote in 2003 was 157 to 3.


Numerous polls conducted in 2003 showed that a majority of Americans and Cuban-Americans in South Florida believe the U.S. government should embark on a new policy, which can enhance their ability to participate in an evolving Cuba as well as begin to address the interests of the Cuban people as they themselves, express them. The community is increasingly and now openly discussing what can be done to speed the reunification of the Cuban family for the benefit of current and future generations on both sides of the Florida Straits.

Days after the Florida Summit, despite the obvious change of heart within the Cuban American community and the urgings of President Gorbachev for President Bush to “Tear down the wall of this embargo,” President Bush reiterated his support of the embargo in a Rose Garden event on October 10, 2004.

In his speech that day to a group of 100 Cuban American embargo supporters (which excluded representatives of the Cuban American National Foundation which by then had become viewed as too moderate since they had earlier in the year advocated dialogue with Cuban government representatives except for the Castros), President Bush announced the formation of a Presidential Commission for Assistance to a Free Cuba. The President’s comments are included later in this compendium.

6 The Commission would be composed of the heads of various U.S. government agencies and include no private sector participation. In 2004, the Bush Administration would adopt many of the Commission recommendations to cut family travel to Cuba, limit remittances and appropriate some $56 million in U.S. government funds to help speed a rapid and peaceful political transition in Cuba.


For Americans at large, the National Summit on Cuba provided a valuable and historic opportunity to examine Cuba in relation to our national security needs in a changing world. It also allowed an overview of the new commercial opportunities being explored by U.S.

Pages:   || 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |   ...   | 33 |

Similar works:

«CHAPTER 4. PERSONALISED LEARNING AND CHANGING CONCEPTIONS OF CHILDHOOD AND YOUTH – 63 Chapter 4 Personalised Learning and Changing Conceptions of Childhood and Youth by Yvonne Hébert and William J. Hartley∗ Hébert and Hartley take the example of Canada as indicative of changing conceptions of youth that occur through societies, shaped by moral, socio-economic, political and legal influences. These include the appearance of a more liberal Christianity, the growth of industrial and...»

«i Land, Water and Local People: A Case Study of Bangalore Mysore Infrastructure Corridor Submitted by Atul Vikas Kulkarni A dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Habitat Policy and Practice School of Habitat Studies Tata Institute of Social Sciences Mumbai 2012 ii DECLARATION I, Atul Vikas Kulkarni, hereby declare that this dissertation entitled ‘Land, Water and Local People: A case study of Bangalore Mysore Infrastructure...»

«Revista UNISCI / UNISCI Journal, Nº 40 (Enero / January 2016) GLOBAL TERRORISM IN 2016 Rohan Gunaratna1 Nanyang Technological University Abstract: With the emergence and the growing clout of Islamic State of Iraq and Greater Syria (ISIS), the terrorist threat confronting the international community has undergone a profound and dangerous transformation. At the same time Al Qaeda is still in the game – a bit diminished but lethal. Unfortunately however, governments – individually and...»

«Breakthrough Britain More than a GaMe harnessing the power of sport to transform the lives of disadvantaged young people a policy report by the Sport Working Group Chaired by Michael de Giorgio May 2011 Supported by contents Contents About the Centre for Social Justice 3 Preface 4 Chairman’s foreword 6 Members of the CSJ Sport Working Group 8 Executive summary 12 1 Sport, disadvantage and social reform 23 1.1 Sport and social policy – where have we come from? 24 1.2 What is disadvantage? 26...»

«KELLY M. BROWN, RONALD CUMMINGS, JANUSZ R. MROZEK, & PETER TERREBONNE* Scrap Tire Disposal: Three Principles for Policy Choice ABSTRACT Scrap tire disposal presents a challenging regulatoryproblem for many states. Properdisposalof scraptires,either through recycling or legal landfill disposal, is difficult and costly. In an effort to address this issue, many states have chosen to develop scrap tire policies, often funded by specialfees on the sale of new tires. These fees typically are used to...»

«VERNON'S CIVIL STATUTES TITLE 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS Art. 30. REVISED STATUTES CITED. These Revised Civil Statutes shall be known and may be cited as the Revised Statutes. Acts 1925, S.B. 84. TITLE 4. AGRICULTURE AND HORTICULTURE CHAPTER 11. COTTON Art. 165-4. COTTON RESEARCH AWARD FUND. Sec. 1. By this Act it is expressly declared to be a State policy that the encouragement and stimulation of new uses for cotton shall be a matter of State-wide importance and concern and that the various...»

«Politicization of Intelligence Reporting: Evidence from the Cold War (Job Market Paper) Oliver Latham∗ University of Cambridge Abstract We examine whether there is systematic evidence that the US intelligence services pandered to their political masters when constructing intelligence estimates during the Cold War. We construct a model which shows how career concerns on the part of intelligence analysts could lead them to distort reports towards their president’s prior beliefs. We then take...»

«David Schwartz Head of Global Policy Cigna Federal Affairs June 22, 2015 601 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW VIA ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION TO http://www.chronic_care@finance.senate.gov Suite 835, South Building Washington, DC 20004 (202) 719-6499 The Honorable Johnny Isakson David.Schwartz@Cigna.com United States Senate 131 Russell Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510 The Honorable Mark Warner United States Senate 475 Russell Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510 Dear Senators Isakson and...»

«Revisiting the Classical View of Bene.ts-Based Taxation Matthew Weinzierl February 11, 2014 Abstract Commentary and political rhetoric on taxes in the United States have long included appeals to Smith’ (1776) classical logic of bene.t based taxation in which an individual’ bene.t from s s the state is tied to his or her income-earning ability. Modern optimal tax theory, in contrast, largely ignores the principle of bene.t based taxation. This paper shows that the classical logic of bene.t...»

«Utbildning & Demokrati 2008, vol 17, no 2, 73–96 Theme: Educating towards civic and professional responsibility Educating for professional responsibility A normative dimension of higher education1 Tone Dyrdal Solbrekke This paper has the politically defined mandate of higher education as its starting point to highlight and discuss contemporary challenges in relation to its normative dimension that are illustrated by examples from Norwegian higher education. A central question in the first...»

«Thailand: Orathai Kokpol Electoral Politics in Thailand Orathai Kokpol Introduction Thailand’s new constitution of 1997 (B.E. 2540) set down new rules and a framework for various fundamental changes in the Thai political and administrative system. As such, great hopes for political reform towards sustainable democracy have been pinned on it. In particular, elections, as a necessary condition for democracy, have changed significantly. The intention is to have more open, fair and meaningful...»

«THE CEIBA TREE AS A MULTIVOCAL SIGNIFIER: Afro-Cuban Symbolism, Political Performance, and Urban Space in the Cuban Republic Joseph Hartman, M.A. Student, Department of Art Education and Art History, University of North Texas INTRODUCTION: AFRO-CUBAN SYMBOLISM, POLITICAL PERFORMANCE, AND URBAN SPACE Ivor Miller’s article “Religious Symbolism in Cuban Political Performance” brings to light an interesting phenomenon: twentieth-century Cuban politicians used symbols that were associated with...»

<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.dissertation.xlibx.info - Dissertations, online materials

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.