WWW.DISSERTATION.XLIBX.INFO
FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Dissertations, online materials
 
<< HOME
CONTACTS



Pages:   || 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |   ...   | 44 |

«A STUDY OF CAPPADOCIAN GREEK NOMINAL MORPHOLOGY FROM A DIACHRONIC AND DIALECTOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE Petros Karatsareas Wolfson College This ...»

-- [ Page 1 ] --

A STUDY OF CAPPADOCIAN GREEK NOMINAL

MORPHOLOGY FROM A DIACHRONIC AND

DIALECTOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE

Petros Karatsareas

Wolfson College

This dissertation is submitted for the degree of

Doctor of Philosophy

Cambridge

September 2011

i

Declaration

This dissertation is my own work and includes nothing which is the outcome of work

done in collaboration except where specifically indicated in the text and the acknowledgements.

This dissertation does not exceed 80,000 words, including footnotes and references, but excluding bibliography.

Cambridge, 5 September 2011 Petros Karatsareas ii iii Abstract In this dissertation, I investigate a number of interrelated developments affecting the morphosyntax of nouns in Cappadocian Greek. I specifically focus on the development of differential object marking, the loss of grammatical gender distinctions, and the neuterisation of noun inflection. My aim is to provide a diachronic account of the innovations that Cappadocian has undergone in the three domains mentioned above.

Αll the innovations examined in this study have the effect of rendering the morphology and syntax of nouns in Cappadocian more like that of neuters. On account of the historical and sociolinguistic circumstances in which Cappadocian developed as well as of the superficial similarity of their outcomes to equivalent structures in Turkish, previous research has overwhelmingly treated the Cappadocian developments as instances of contact-induced change that resulted from the influence of Turkish. In this study, I examine the Cappadocian innovations from a language-internal point of view and in comparison with parallel developments attested in the other Modern Greek dialects of Asia Minor, namely Pontic, Rumeic, Pharasiot and Silliot. My comparative analysis of a wide range of dialect-internal, cross-dialectal and cross-linguistic typological evidence shows that language contact with Turkish can be identified as the main cause of change only in the case of differential object marking. On the other hand, with respect to the origins of the most pervasive innovations in gender and noun inflection, I argue that they go back to the common linguistic ancestor of the modern Asia Minor Greek dialects and do not owe their development to language contact with Turkish. I show in detail that the superficial similarity of these latter innovations’ outcomes to their Turkish equivalents in each case represents the final stage in a long series of typologically plausible, language-internal developments whose early manifestations predate the intensification of Cappadocian–Turkish linguistic and cultural exchange. These findings show that diachronic change in Cappadocian is best understood when examined within a larger Asia Minor Greek context. On the whole, they make a significant contribution to our knowledge of the history of Cappadocian and the Asia Minor Greek dialects as well as to Modern Greek dialectology more generally, and open a fresh round of discussion on the origin and development of other innovations attested in these dialects that are considered by historical linguists and Modern Greek dialectologists to be untypically Greek or contact-induced or both.

iv v Acknowledgements First and foremost, I would like to gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Greek State Scholarships Foundation (Ίδρυμα Κρατικών Υποτροφιών), the Alexander S. Onassis Public Benefit Foundation (Κοινωφελές Ίδρυμα Αλέξανδρος Σ. Ωνάσης) and the George and Marie Vergottis Fund of the Cambridge European Trust, which generously funded my doctoral studies. I also wish to express my appreciation to the Department of Linguistics and to Wolfson College for providing me with additional funding to attend various conferences both in the United Kingdom and abroad.

My work has benefited greatly from the insightful and constructive comments of my supervisor, Bert Vaux, whom I would like to thank for all his help and guidance during the past four years. Many thanks go to James Clackson, my PhD advisor (or is it adviser?), and to David Willis for the valuable feedback they gave me at my yearly assessment interviews; also, to Christoforos Charalampakis, my ΙΚΥ supervisor, for his contribution. I would like to extend my gratitude to Ioanna Sitaridou, who, apart from co-supervising my MPhil, was the one to light the spark of my interest in Cappadocian Greek.

I am particularly indebted to Christina Basea-Bezantakou, the Director of the Research Centre for Modern Greek Dialects — I.L.N.E. (Κέντρο Ερεύνης των Νεοελληνικών Διαλέκτων και Ιδιωμάτων — Ι.Λ.Ν.Ε.) of the Academy of Athens, for granting me access to the Centre’s Manuscript Archive from which I collected rare material on the Cappadocian varieties and to the researchers of the Centre, especially Stamatis Beis, Georgia Katsouda, Magdalini Konstantinidou and Maria Vrachionidou for the constructive discussions we had while I collected material from the Archive;

also, to the library staff of the Centre for Asia Minor Studies (Κέντρο Μικρασιατικών Σπουδών) at Athens for helping me get hold of a considerable number of publications on Cappadocian and the other Asia Minor Greek dialects that were hard to find in the United Kingdom.





I am grateful to all the people with whom I have exchanged ideas regarding my work and theirs that helped me advance and broaden my understanding of the issues I dealt with in my research. Special thanks go to the investigators and researchers of the Grammar of Medieval Greek Research Project at Cambridge, especially to Io Manolessou and Notis Toufexis; to the audiences of the various conferences at which I presented papers while my research was still in progress, especially to Giannoula Giannoulopoulou, Nikolaos Pantelidis and Eleni Valma at the 4th International Conference of Modern Greek Dialects and Linguistic Theory at Chios; to Inés Fernández-Ordóñez, Brian Joseph and Peter Trudgill at the XIXth International Conference on Historical Linguistics at Nijmegen; to Peter Mackridge at the Greek in Pontus: Romeyka in Contemporary Trebizond Workshop at Cambridge; to Andrew Garrett at the Language, Text and History: Linguistics and Philology in the 21st Century Symposium of the Philological Society at Cambridge; to the four (!) anonymous reviewers of the paper I published in the Transactions of the Philological Society (you—and I now—know who you are!); and to Thanasis Giannaris. I would also vi like to thank Elżbieta Adamczyk, Stergios Chatzikyriakidis, Vicky Chondrogianni, Inés Fernández-Ordóñez, Francesco Gardani, Cristina Guardiano, Chryso Hadjidemetriou, Mark Janse, Konstantinos Kakarikos, Magdalini Konstantinidou, Adam Ledgeway, Martin Maiden, Aggeliki Malikouti-Drachman, Io Manolessou, Dimitra Melissaropoulou, Ioanna Sitaridou, Vassilios Spyropoulos, Evangelia Thomadaki, Notis Toufexis and Hugh Everard Wilkinson for trusting me with copies of their published and/or unpublished work. I thank Makis Theofilopoulos of the Greek newspaper ΤΑ ΝΕΑ for sending me an electronic version of a published map of the Cappadocian villages. I also thank Chris Geissler for translating Hans Dernschwam’s text (§2.2) and Illan Gonen for typing the Perso-Arabic text in §2.3 for me.

Spyros Armosti, Mina Daniel and Aaron Ralby deserve special mention for proofreading parts of my dissertation. This task fell largely on Aaron, who proofread almost the whole of it. Spyros proofread the list of symbols and the reference list whereas Mina proofread Chapter 6. I owe the excellent design of Maps 2.1, 2.2 and 2.3 as well as that of Figures 2.2 and 2.3 to Emmanouil Magkaris. I hereby thank all four of them for their invaluable help that came when I needed it the most. Of course, all errors remain my own.

On a personal level, I was fortunate to have the support and encouragement of very dear friends. My gratitude goes to Spyros Armosti, Eftychia Eftychiou, Evgenia Mesaritou, Karolina Moutsopoulou and Efstathia Pitsa, who have been constantly by my side since my early days in Cambridge; also, to my fellow ‘nesters’ Thomas Godard, Claudia ‘Mom’ Peverini-Benson, Thomas Rainsford, Erica Ross, Anna Tristram, Liv Walsh and Claire White—all of us were on the same boat under the adverse (weather) conditions of the Graduate Centre on the far off third floor of the MML Faculty. I am also ever so grateful to Emmanouil Magkaris for making possible my escapes from the bubble that is Cambridge out to the real world, and to my old friends from Greece, who made sure I felt as if I had never left home every time I went back.

Τέλος, θα ήθελα να εκφράσω την ευγνωμοσύνη μου στην οικογένειά μου και

ιδιαίτερα στους γονείς μου, Βασίλειο και Έλλη Καρατσαρέα, για την ανιδιοτελή αγάπη

που μου προσφέρουν απλόχερα από τότε που θυμάμαι τον εαυτό μου και για την αμέριστη συμπαράσταση και κάθε είδους υποστήριξη που δείχνουν έμπρακτα σε κάθε βήμα της ζωής μου. Μαμά και μπαμπά, nagyon hálás vagyok mindenért.

vii Table of Contents Declaration

Abstract

Acknowledgements

Table of Contents

List of Tables

List of Figures

List of Maps

List of Textual Abbreviations

List of Linguistic Abbreviations

List of Symbols

1 Introduction

2 The Modern Greek dialect of Cappadocia

2.0 Introduction

2.1 The language

2.2 The social, cultural and linguistic history of the Cappadocian speakers.......14 2.3 The linguistic record

2.4 The effects of early linguistic separation and intense language contact on Cappadocian

2.5 Cappadocian in the dialectological context of Asia Minor

2.5.1 The common linguistic ancestor of the modern Asia Minor Greek dialects

2.5.2 The dialectal differentiation of Asia Minor Greek

2.5.3 Investigating diachronic change in Cappadocian from a dialectological perspective: a methodological case-in-point............55 2.6 Conclusion

3 The development of differential object marking

3.0 Introduction

3.1 (Non-)differential object marking in Turkish and Modern Greek

3.1.1 The typology of differential object marking

3.1.1.1 Determining differential object marking: animacy and definiteness

3.1.1.2 The motivation underlying differential object marking...........70 3.1.2 Turkish: a differential language

3.1.3 Modern Greek: a non-differential language

3.1.4 Summary

3.2 Cappadocian and Pharasiot: two differential Modern Greek dialects.............83 3.2.1 Differential object marking in Cappadocian

3.2.2 Differential object marking in Pharasiot

viii 3.2.

3 Summary

3.3 An ‘un-Greek’, contact-induced development

3.3.1 Previous accounts

3.3.2 The typological improbability of Cappadocian and Pharasiot differential object marking

3.3.3 Matching Modern Greek definiteness with Turkish specificity....... 98 3.3.3.1 Contact-induced innovation and change

3.3.3.2 Pattern replication in Cappadocian and Pharasiot.................. 100 3.3.4 Summary

3.4 The implications of the development of differential object marking in Cappadocian

3.4.1 Two old hypotheses

3.4.1.1 The reanalysis of final -ς as an indefiniteness marker............ 107 3.4.1.2 Definiteness split

3.4.2 A new connection

3.4.2.1 The introduction of neuter-like case syncretism in masculine nouns

3.4.2.2 DOM and noun inflection

3.4.3 Summary

3.5 Conclusions

4 The loss of grammatical gender

4.0 Introduction

4.1 Gender in Modern Greek and Turkish

4.1.1 The typology of gender

4.1.1.1 Defining gender: agreement controllers, targets and domains

4.1.1.2 Gender assignment: semantic and formal systems................. 131 4.1.1.3 Gender agreement: syntactic versus semantic

4.1.2 Modern Greek: a gender language

4.1.2.1 Gender assignment

4.1.2.2 Gender agreement

4.1.2.3 Gender and prototypicality: Anastassiadis-Symeonidis and Chila-Markopoulou (2003)

4.1.3 Turkish: a genderless language

4.1.4 Summary

4.2 Gender in Cappadocian and other Asia Minor Greek dialects

4.2.1 Cappadocian: neuter agreement

4.2.2 Pharasiot: syntactic and neuter agreement

4.2.3 Pontic: syntactic and semantic agreement

4.2.4 Rumeic: semantic agreement

4.2.5 Two innovations in Asia Minor Greek

4.2.6 Summary

ix 4.3 Previous accounts of the Asia Minor Greek developments in agreement... 167 4.3.1 Cappadocian neuter agreement

4.3.2 Pontic semantic agreement

4.3.3 Summary

4.4 A fresh look

4.4.1 The typological and crosslinguistic context

4.4.2 The development of semantic agreement in Asia Minor Greek:

resemanticisation and restructuring

4.4.3 The development of neuter agreement in Cappadocian and Pharasiot

4.4.4 The relationships between the Asia Minor Greek dialects with respect to agreement

4.4.5 Summary

4.5 Conclusions

5 The neuterisation of noun inflection

5.0 Introduction

5.1 Noun inflection in Modern Greek and Turkish

5.1.1 Modern Greek

5.1.1.1 General typological characteristics

5.1.1.2 The ι-neuter inflectional class

5.1.2 Turkish

5.1.3 Summary

5.2 Noun inflection in Cappadocian

5.2.1 An inflectional system of the Modern Greek type

5.2.2 Some common dialectal variation

5.2.3 Inflectional innovations

5.2.4 Summary

5.3 The development of neuter heteroclisis

5.3.1 Morphological reanalysis of the ι-neuter inflectional endings...... 228 5.3.2 Genitive singular and plural heteroclisis

5.3.2.1 Stress uncertainty as the trigger for the early development of neuter heteroclisis



Pages:   || 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |   ...   | 44 |


Similar works:

«AUGUSTUS LE PLONGEON: EARLY MAYA ARCHAEOLOGIST by Lawrence Gustave Desmond B.S.C., University of Santa Clara, 1957 M.S., San Jose State University, 1964 Universidad de las Americas, 1979 ~1.A., A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Colorado in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Anthropology This thesis for the Doctor of Philosophy degree by Lawrence Gustave Desmond has been approved for the...»

«Van Inwagen on the Problem of Evil: the Good, the Bad and the Ugly Kenny Boyce & Justin McBrayer The purpose of this essay is to probe the most important points of Peter van Inwagen’s 2003 Gifford lectures on the problem of evil (van Inwagen 2006) in an effort to initiate a thoughtful workshop discussion for the 2007 Baylor philosophy of religion conference. In true Texas style, the paper is entitled “Van Inwagen on the Problem of Evil: the Good, the Bad and the Ugly.” In the section on...»

«REGULATION OF SINK STRENGTH IN DEVELOPING MAIZE FLORETS: IMPLICATIONS FOR SEED SET AND GRAIN YIELD By ANDREA LEE EVELAND A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2008 1 © 2008 Andrea L. Eveland 2 To Joshua Shome, in loving memory. 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Many thanks go to the members of my committee, Donald McCarty, John Davis, Robert Ferl, and Edward Braun, for...»

«EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ORIENTATION INDICATORS WITH AN AWARENESS OF INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES by Tina Renee Ziemek A dissertation submitted to the faculty of The University of Utah in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Computer Science School of Computing The University of Utah June 2010 Copyright c Tina Renee Ziemek 2010 All Rights Reserved THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH GRADUATE SCHOOL SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE APPROVAL of a dissertation submitted by...»

«Gurnang Life Challenge Young Adult Offender Women Adventure Based Challenge Experiential Learning/Adventure Therapy Program Overview Contents Acknowledgments Executive Summary Introduction and Philosophical Overview What is the Issue? Dynamic Risks Gurnang Life Challenge Women Experiential Learning/Adventure Therapy Program Future of ABC Historical Overview What Is Adventurous Activities and Experiential learning Effectiveness of Adventurous / Experiential Learning activities What Else Is...»

«Abstract Title of Dissertation: Novel Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase (ERK) Targeted Inhibitors Effects on Apoptotic Signaling: A Potential Cancer Therapy Sarice R. Boston, Doctor of Philosophy, 2011 Dissertation directed by: Paul Shapiro, Ph.D. Associate Professor Associate Dean for Research and Graduate Education Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences University of Maryland, Baltimore The extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1 and 2 (ERK 1/2) proteins potently mediate cell proliferation...»

«Anatomy of the Transmastoid Endolymphatic Sac Decompression in the Management of Ménière’s Disease Richard Robert Locke Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Glasgow Faculty of Biomedical and Life Sciences April 2008 © Richard R Locke, 2008 ABSTRACT Ménière’s disease affects 1 in 1000 people and produces vertigo and hearing loss (Morrison, 1981). Endolymphatic sac decompression has been advocated on the basis that endolymphatic hydrops is the underlying...»

«IDENTIFYING PHYSICAL ACTIVITY-ASSOCIATED NEUROPROTECTIVE GENE TRANSCRIPTS By Amanda Christine Mitchell Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Vanderbilt University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Neuroscience December, 2011 Nashville, Tennessee Approved: Professor Károly Mirnics Professor Aaron Bowman Professor Judy L. Cameron Professor Christine Konradi To the many people who have shaped my brain, my life, and my...»

«The University of Hull The Poetic Oeuvre of „Michael Field‟: Collaboration, Aestheticism and Desire in the Writings of Katharine Harris Bradley (1846 – 1914) and Edith Emma Cooper (1862 – 1913) being a Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the University of Hull by Matthew William Mitton, BA (Hons.), MA (Dist.) September 2008 Acknowledgements Firstly, I would like to express my gratitude to the members of the Department of English,...»

«ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: ARTICULATING IDENTITIES: RHETORICAL READINGS OF ASIAN AMERICAN LITERACY NARRATIVES Linnea Marie Hasegawa, Doctor of Philosophy, 2004 Dissertation directed by: Professor Kandice Chuh Department of English This dissertation examines how Asian American writers, through what I call critical acts of literacy, discursively (re)construct the self and make claims for alternative spaces in which to articulate their identities as legitimate national subjects. I argue that...»

«Erkenn DOI 10.1007/s10670-008-9149-3 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Dear Haecceitism Delia Graff Fara Received: 27 July 2007 / Accepted: 1 December 2008 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 Abstract If a counterpart theorist’s understanding of the counterpart relation precludes haecceitist differences between possible worlds, as David Lewis’s does, how can he admit haecceitist possibilities, as Lewis wants to? Lewis (Philosophical Review 3–32, 1983; On the Plurality of Worlds, 1986) devised...»

«BA RU C H S. B L U M B E R G FRANK MARGESON 28 july 1925. 5 april 2011 PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN PHILOSOPHICAL SOCIETY VOL. 155, NO. 3, SEPTEMBER 2011 biographical memoirs B ARUCH S. BLUMBERG (Barry) was a very active and enthusiastic member of the Society from his election on 25 April 1986 until his death on 5 April 2011. He presented papers: “Hepatitis B Virus and the Prevention of Primary Cancer of the Liver” (November 1980) and “Humboldt in Philadelphia” (April 1989), and...»





 
<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.dissertation.xlibx.info - Dissertations, online materials

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.