WWW.DISSERTATION.XLIBX.INFO
FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Dissertations, online materials
 
<< HOME
CONTACTS



Pages:   || 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |   ...   | 10 |

«Information Paper April 2001 CORE PRINCIPLES FOR EFFECTIVE BANKING SUPERVISION: SELF-ASSESSMENT FOR AUSTRALIA Information Paper APRIL 2001 Australian ...»

-- [ Page 1 ] --

Core Principles

for Effective

Banking Supervision:

Self-Assessment

for Australia

Information Paper

April 2001

CORE PRINCIPLES FOR EFFECTIVE

BANKING SUPERVISION:

SELF-ASSESSMENT FOR AUSTRALIA

Information Paper

APRIL 2001

Australian Prudential Regulation Authority

PREAMBLE

This document outlines APRA’s self-assessment of its supervisory policies and practices against the Core Principles for Effective Banking Supervision, issued by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision in October 1999 1.

Although supervisory practices and processes are always evolving and, we hope, improving over time, it is nonetheless invaluable to take stock now and then; to subject our supervisory arrangements to scrutiny against internationally accepted benchmarks, and to consider where improvements can be made. To be effective, any such assessment must be undertaken with a critical eye. It is too easy for supervisors to assert that existing arrangements represent best practice when closer analysis would reveal otherwise.This document has been prepared with that thought firmly in mind.

In preparing the assessment, it should be noted that APRA is responsible for supervising all authorised deposit-taking institutions (ADIs) in Australia (including banks, building societies and credit unions).

However, reflecting the objective of the Basel Committee, this document has as its focus the supervisory regime surrounding banks. In practice, the legislative framework and much of APRA’s supervisory processes are applied equally to all deposit-takers. Where this is not the case, the supervisory standards applying specifically to banks have been used as the basis for assessment (with references to the approach adopted for non-bank ADIs included as a footnote).

Comments and views on the self-assessment are welcome, and should be directed to:

Mr Brian Gray Executive General Manager Policy, Research and Consulting Australian Prudential Regulation Authority GPO Box 9836 SYDNEY NSW 2001 1 Details on the Core Principles can be found on the Bank for International Settlements website (www.bis.org) APRA APRIL 2000 1

CORE PRINCIPLES FOR EFFECTIVE BANKING SUPERVISION:

SELF-ASSESSMENT FOR AUSTRALIA

1. INTRODUCTION The development of criteria against which supervisory systems can be assessed, both in absolute terms and relative to those in other countries, has long been a goal of prudential regulators. However, practical impediments to establishing appropriate benchmarks (for example, the difficulty in adequately quantifying the “quality” of supervisory arrangements, as well as inherent differences in supervisory systems throughout the world) have made for slow progress. Nevertheless by the late 1990s work on this topic, commissioned by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS), had begun to take form, and the Core Principles for Effective Banking Supervision were issued in September 1997.

The Principles were developed by the Committee (which comprises the central banks and bank supervisory agencies of the G10 countries) in co-operation with supervisors from non-G10 countries.2 The Principles were endorsed by the international financial community during annual meetings of the IMF and World Bank in Hong Kong in October 1997.

Soon after release, a first attempt was made to survey a large number of countries, with a view to assessing the degree of adherence with the new Principles. This was done in the lead-up to the October 1998 International Conference of Banking Supervisors (ICBS) in Sydney. Results of the survey were mixed however, and pointed to the need for further refinement of the Principles and greater rigour both in the detail and presentation of the Principles. Because of the subjective and high-level nature of the Principles at that stage, direct comparisons of results from country to country proved to be unreliable.

The Sydney ICBS, therefore, called for more work to be done aimed at producing a more precise and useable form of guidelines. The Committee responded, and a revised Core Principles Methodology was issued in October 1999.

1.1 The New Core Principles Methodology There are two elements to the Core Principles. The first is macroeconomic/macroprudential in character and requires a broad assessment of the so-called “Preconditions for Effective Banking Supervision”. Here the focus is on those structural or other features of the economy or financial system, against which the detailed day to day microeconomic work of the supervisor takes place. In the absence of these fundamental preconditions, any system of prudential supervision is unlikely to achieve the objectives of institutional and system-wide safety and stability for which it is designed.

The preconditions include:

• sound and sustainable macroeconomic policies;

• a well-developed public infrastructure;

• effective market discipline; and • mechanisms for providing an appropriate level of systemic protection.

The second aspect of the methodology is the 25 Core Principles. These represent the agreed set of highlevel Principles against which systems of prudential supervision can be measured and assessed. To aid the assessment, detailed criteria – deemed “essential” and “additional” criteria – have been established.





The essential criteria for any particular principle are defined as the elements that must be present in order to demonstrate compliance with the Principle in question. The additional criteria are requirements that, in conjunction with the essential criteria, act to strengthen supervisory systems and the prospect for financial stability.

2 The Core Principles Liaison Group was set up to assist in the development of the Principles. APRA is represented on that group which comprises selected G10 and non G10 countries.

–  –  –

1.2 Core Principles Assessments

In practice, Core Principles assessments may be conducted in a variety of contexts:

• self-assessments of local supervisory regimes by domestic bank supervisors;

• peer reviews conducted, for instance, within regional groupings of bank supervisors;

• reviews conducted by private third parties such as ratings agencies and consulting firms; and

• reviews in the context of IMF surveillance or World Bank lending programs, or via the joint IMFWorld Bank Financial Stability Assessment Program (FSAP).

Self-assessment is viewed as an informal but nonetheless valuable means of establishing the current stateof-play of bank supervisory systems, and identifying areas where improvements may be required to bring arrangements closer into line with international best practice. If an assessment is sufficiently rigorous, it will help identify deficiencies even if there is little evidence of those deficiencies having caused actual problems (ie. it is proactive rather than reactive).

1.3 Assessing Australia’s Compliance with the Core Principles Our starting point, therefore, was to look at the system of bank supervision in Australia from the position of an independent, informed, outside party. Our goal was an assessment sufficiently rigorous to stand up to any outside scrutiny. We then sought to assess the extent to which any apparent shortcomings should be addressed through changes in practice or policy (this resolves to a question of determining the relative costs and benefits of changing existing arrangements). In areas where we have identified a shortcoming against the Principles, we have also indicated the remedial action required to bring arrangements into compliance.

2. PRECONDITIONS FOR EFFECTIVE BANKING SUPERVISION

A sound system of banking supervision requires, as its foundations, a range of preconditions to be in place.

As noted above, these preconditions include sound and sustainable macroeconomic policies; a welldeveloped public infrastructure; effective market discipline; procedures for the efficient resolution of problems in banks; and mechanisms for providing an appropriate level of systemic protection. While these are largely beyond the control of the bank supervisor, they may nevertheless significantly affect the supervisor’s ability to implement the Core Principles. Hence, it is necessary to assess the extent to which these preconditions are satisfied before any assessment of compliance with the Core Principles takes place.

Our assessment is that the preconditions for effective banking supervision are satisfied fully in the case of Australia.

Australia is a modern, deregulated, open economy. The macroeconomic policy framework is generally perceived to be sound and sustainable, with monetary policy guided by an independent central bank with a clear policy objective focusing on maintenance of low inflation, and the absence of significant fiscal imbalances.

There exists a strong public infrastructure, including:

• effective supervision of markets by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) and of the payments system by the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA);

• a sound legal system with strong enforcement of laws associated with contract enforcement, bankruptcy, collateral and loan recovery; and

• accounting standards which are broadly consistent with internationally accepted principles, and disclosure requirements that ensure markets remain well-informed.

–  –  –

As described in the detailed section on the Principles (see below) APRA has at its disposal a range of powers, equal to any system in the world, to assist with the prompt resolution of problems in a bank.

Furthermore, arrangements are in place to permit the RBA, on advice from APRA, to provide a lenderof-last-resort facility to a solvent bank that has encountered liquidity constraints, if there is potential for systemic problems to emerge. These specific arrangements are in addition to the general powers of the RBA to inject liquidity into the financial system in the event of financial disruption, whatever the cause.

To the extent possible, therefore, the financial system and the economy more generally are insulated from the side effects of problems in the banking sector.

It should be noted that Australia does not have any form of deposit insurance scheme to protect depositors in a failed institution. Though the absence of such a scheme is unusual by world standards, this must also be read against the background of the Australian system in which no depositor has, since the passing of the Banking Act in 1945, ever lost funds held in an authorised bank.

3. CORE PRINCIPLES FOR EFFECTIVE BANKING SUPERVISION – ASSESSMENT

The assessment of compliance with each of the 25 Principles, set out in detail below, is made largely on a qualitative basis. A five-part assessment system is used, outlining the extent to which Australia can be considered compliant, largely compliant, materially non-compliant, or non-compliant with each of the 25 Principles. The fifth category, “not applicable,” is for cases where a Priniciple is not relevant to the banking system in question.

To achieve a “compliant” assessment in relation to a Principle, all essential criteria generally must be met without any significant deficiencies. However, there may be instances where it can be demonstrated that the Principle has been achieved through different means. Where appropriate, such additional information should be taken into account in reaching an overall assessment. Conversely, satisfying the essential criteria might not always be sufficient to achieve the objective of the Principle, and therefore one or more additional criteria and/or other measures may also be deemed necessary by the assessor to judge that compliance is achieved.

A “largely compliant” assessment is given if only minor shortcomings are observed, and these are not viewed as sufficient to raise serious doubts about the authority’s ability to achieve the objective of that Principle. A “materially non-compliant” assessment is given when the shortcoming are sufficient to raise doubts about the authority’s ability to achieve compliance, but substantive progress towards compliance has been achieved. A “non-compliant” assessment is given when no substantive progress towards compliance has been achieved.

3.1 Results Details of our assessment are set out below with identification of the respective Principles, our assessment, background to the assessment and action required where some shortfall is identified. To summarise those

findings, we believe that the supervisory framework covering Australian banks can be considered:

• compliant with 11 Principles;

• largely compliant with 12 Principles; and

• materially non-compliant with the remaining 2 Principles.

For many of the key Principles, APRA regards Australia to be fully compliant. For example, there are clear responsibilities and objectives for each agency involved in the supervision of banks – primarily APRA, but other agencies as well – as required by Principle 1. The capital requirements imposed on Australian banks are consistent with those produced by the BCBS (Principle 6). APRA requires that banks establish and adhere to adequate policies and procedures for evaluating the quality of assets and the

–  –  –

adequacy of loan loss provisions and reserves (Principle 8), and APRA’s supervisory approach includes both on-site and off-site components (Principle 16).



Pages:   || 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |   ...   | 10 |


Similar works:

«ALESSE® 28 Tablets (levonorgestrel and ethinyl estradiol tablets) Rx only Patients should be counseled that oral contraceptives do not protect against transmission of HIV (AIDS) and other sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) such as chlamydia, genital herpes, genital warts, gonorrhea, hepatitis B, and syphilis.DESCRIPTION 21 pink active tablets each containing 0.10 mg of levonorgestrel, d(-)-13β-ethyl-17α-ethinyl17β-hydroxygon-4-en-3-one, a totally synthetic progestogen, and 0.02 mg of...»

«Public Assessment Report Alrex 0.2% Eye Drop Suspension (loteprednol etabonate) PL 00033/0160 MHRA: PAR – Alrex 0.2% Eye Drop Suspension (loteprednol etabonate) PL 00033/0160 1 ALREX 0.2% EYE DROP SUSPENSION (LOTEPREDNOL ETABONATE) PL 00033/0160 UKPAR TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Lay Summary 3 Scientific discussion 4 Steps taken for assessment 38 Steps taken after authorisation – summary 39 Summary of Product Characteristics 40 Patient Information Leaflet 48 Labelling 51 MHRA: PAR – Alrex 0.2%...»

«Saurashtra University Re – Accredited Grade ‘B’ by NAAC (CGPA 2.93) Vyas, Vijay H., 2008, An Effect of Merger on Financial Performance of Corporate Sector in India, thesis PhD, Saurashtra University http://etheses.saurashtrauniversity.edu/id/eprint/109 Copyright and moral rights for this thesis are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from...»

«The Bosnian State a Decade after Dayton SUMANTRA BOSE A decade on from the Dayton peace settlement, this essay sets out to examine two questions. First, is the consociational and confederal paradigm established by the Dayton agreement, and subsequently institutionalized, the appropriate framework for the Bosnian state? It will be suggested that in the circumstances that prevail, this framework does in fact provide the most feasible and most democratic form of government for Bosnia’s...»

«No longer at Ease Chinua Achebe 1 No Longer at Ease First published in 1960 1 For Christie 2 We returned to our places, these Kingdoms, But no longer at ease here, in the old dispensation, With an alien people clutching their gods. I should be glad of another death. T. S. Eliot : 'The Journey of the Magi'. 3 CHAPTER ONE For three or four weeks Obi Okonkwo had been steeling himself against this moment. And when he walked into the dock that morning he thought he was fully prepared. He wore a...»

«PRODUCT MONOGRAPH Biphentin® (methylphenidate hydrochloride controlled release capsules) 10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60 and 80 mg Central Nervous System Stimulant Purdue Pharma 575 Granite Court Pickering, ON L1W 3W8 DATE OF REVISION: June 10, 2016 Control No.: 179185 Biphentin® is a trademark of Purdue Pharma Biphentin® (methylphenidate HCl CR capsules) Page 1 of 39 NAME OF DRUG Biphentin® (methylphenidate hydrochloride controlled release capsules) 10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60 and 80 mg...»

«30029-XX Entocort® EC (budesonide) Capsules Rx only DESCRIPTION Budesonide, the active ingredient of ENTOCORT® EC capsules, is a synthetic corticosteroid. It is designated chemically as (RS)­ 11β, 16α, 17,21-tetrahydroxypregna-1,4-diene-3,20-dione cyclic 16,17-acetal with butyraldehyde. Budesonide is provided as a mixture of two epimers (22R and 22S). The empirical formula of budesonide is C25H34O6 and its molecular weight is 430.5. Its structural formula is: C H 2O H C O CH3 H O HO C O...»

«Many of the following comments are taken from a sermon given by Dr. Ed DeVires on August 10, 1998 at King James Baptist Church in Arlington, Texas. Some editing has been done for clarity purposes. We have endeavored to insure that the original meaning of the sermon remains intact. All scriptural references’ are from the King James version of the Bible. Let us begin with a basic scripture which teaches us to glorify God in our bodies, as well as our spirits. I COR 6:19-20 What? know ye not...»

«when co-administered with other serotonergic agents (including triptans, HIGHLIGHTS OF PRESCRIBING INFORMATION tricyclic antidepressants, fentanyl, lithium, tramadol, tryptophan, These highlights do not include all the information needed to use Savella buspirone and St. John’s Wort). If such symptoms occur, discontinue safely and effectively. See full prescribing information for Savella. Savella and initiate supportive treatment. If concomitant use of Savella with other serotonergic drugs is...»

«Brno Studies in English Volume 38, No. 2, 2012 ISSN 0524-6881 DOI: 10.5817/BSE2012-2-10 Reviews Carol Berkenkotter, Vijay K. Bhatia and Maurizio Gotti (eds.): Insights into Academic Genres. Bern: Peter Lang, 2012. ISBN 978-3-0343-1211-0, 468 pp. Over the eleven years since its establishment in 2001, the series “Linguistic Insights” has won very positive recognition among scholars in various disciplines of linguistics. The series, issued by the publishing house Peter Lang and under the...»

«OXYCHEM C AUSTIC S ODA H ANDBOOK Occidental Chemical Corporation (OxyChem) is a leading North American manufacturer of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) resins, chlorine and caustic soda, key building blocks for a variety of indispensable products such as plastics, pharmaceuticals and water treatment chemicals. Other OxyChem products include caustic potash, chlorinated organics, sodium silicates, chlorinated isocyanurates and calcium chloride. For every product it makes, OxyChem’s market position is...»

«Courtesy of John Devaney at www.fullpointsfooty.net 1961 SANFL Grand Final: West Adelaide vs. Norwood The Turkish Bath Grand Final Link Bar 1 Norwood's 'Big Bill' Wedding wins a clean tap against Neil Kerley during the course of the 1961 SANFL grand final. Courtesy of John Devaney at www.fullpointsfooty.net Apart from the spectacular fall from grace of 1960 premier North Adelaide, the 1961 SANFL minor round spawned few surprises, and gave rise to the following ladder: 1961 SANFL Premiership...»





 
<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.dissertation.xlibx.info - Dissertations, online materials

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.