WWW.DISSERTATION.XLIBX.INFO
FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Dissertations, online materials
 
<< HOME
CONTACTS



«MEMORANDUM ORDER AND SEPTEMBER 28, 2005 PRATTER, DISTRICT JUDGE I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND The Great Seal Moorish Science Temple of America, Inc.,1 and ...»

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

THE GREAT SEAL MOORISH SCIENCE : CIVIL ACTION

TEMPLE OF AMERICA, INC., et al., :

Plaintiffs, :

:

v. :

:

STATE OF NEW JERSEY; ASBURY PARK :

POLICE DEPARTMENT; SGT. JOHN :

BROYLES; OFFICER JOSEPH P. SPALLINA; :

OFFICER JOHN P. SOSDIAN III; PATRICIA :

GREEN, COURT CLERK, WALL TWSP. :

POLICE DEPARTMENT; SGT. LANCELOTTI; :

SGT. BROCKLEY; JIM’S TOWING; :

RICHARD’S AUTO BODY, et al., :

Defendants. : NO. 05-cv-345

MEMORANDUM ORDER

AND SEPTEMBER 28, 2005

PRATTER, DISTRICT JUDGE

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

The Great Seal Moorish Science Temple of America, Inc.,1 and other related entities (the 1 The Moorish Science Temple of America was founded by Timothy Drew, a/k/a Noble Drew Ali, in 1913.

See http://www.sevensealspublications.com/56611.html. The Moor members of Plaintiff the Great Seal Seven appear to be followers of Drew’s teachings. Drew preached that all African-Americans are of Moorish descent and thus are not citizens of the United States. See United States v. James, 328 F.3d 953, 954 (7th Cir. 2003). Drew instructed his followers that all “Moorish Americans” must carry a “Moorish passport” bearing one’s “real” name, which was often created fictitiously by adding names that Drew claimed corresponded to the three ancient Moroccan tribes, “Ali,” “Bey,” or “El,” to one’s given birth name. See United States v. Darden, 70 F. 3d 1507, 1517 (8th Cir.

1995).

The Moors claim certain rights as a result of the Treaty of Peace and Friendship of 1786, entered into by the United States of America and the Kingdom of Morocco (the “Treaty”). According to the Moors, the Treaty subjects them only to the laws of Morocco, including the taxing provisions. Moreover, the Moors do not believe that African Americans are technically citizens of the United States within the meaning of the United States Constitution as a result of many of the Moors’ predecessors being brought to the United States as slaves. Thus, they contend that descendants of slaves are not subject to the laws established pursuant to the Constitution. See http://www.thenationofmorrish-americans.org/bey.htm. Moors also believe that the Dred Scott decision (Scott v.

–  –  –

Jersey, the Asbury Park Police Department, including individual members of the Police Department (hereinafter, collectively, the “Asbury Defendants”), and the Wall Township Police Department, including members of the Police Department (hereinafter, collectively, the “Wall Defendants”), arising out of incidents that allegedly occurred between some of the Defendants and an individual or individuals belonging to the Moors organizations representing the Plaintiffs here. The Moors’ Complaint is extremely vague and the exact causes of action for which the Moors seek relief is unclear.2 Essentially, the Complaint makes no logical sense, inasmuch as it is a random rendition bordering on a mish-mosh of legalese turned into meaningless meanderings.

The allegations in the Complaint seem to stem from the impounding of a vehicle allegedly owned by an individual with the given name of Lee Shawn Crodup, a/k/a “Lord Noble Nature El Bey.” While the Complaint fails to comport with anything approaching standard pleading procedures and contains no references to an individual plaintiff or discrete actions Sanford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857)) stands for the proposition that African-Americans are not citizens of the United States and thus the duties of citizens, including abiding by the laws of the United States and paying taxes, do not apply to African-Americans. See id; see also, James, 328 F.3d at 954 (where the defendant offered a defense that his ancestors came from Africa, thus, he was a Moorish national required to obey only those laws mentioned in the Treaty).

Recently, within the jurisdiction of this circuit, Moors adherents have been convicted of creating fictitious money orders and checks that were purportedly authorized by the Department of the Treasury and the Department of Transportation. See, e.g., U.S. v. Waalee, 133 Fed. Appx. 819 (3d Cir. May 17, 2005)(defendant convicted of trying to pass fake Department of Treasury checks for $25 million); United States v. Harris, 332 F. Supp. 2d. 692 (D.N.J. 2004) (defendants in southern New Jersey created thousands of fictitious money orders for more than $50 million in alleged scam victimizing banks, utilities, lenders and a casino); see also, Shiffman and Wood, N.J. Jury Convicts Moors, Philadelphia Inquirer, July 2, 2004.

2 Unfortunately, all of the Moors’ filings in this case are virtually unintelligible.

–  –  –

violations of civil rights, racketeering, kidnaping, conspiracy and “high treason.” Plaintiffs do identify each of the Defendants in the Complaint. From reading the Complaint, the Court can divine that each of the Defendants are citizens of the State of New Jersey and all of the actions alleged in the Complaint appear to refer to events occurring in localities within the State of New Jersey.





Asbury Park is a municipality within the State of New Jersey. Wall Township also is a municipality within the State of New Jersey. Because of the nearly unintelligible nature of the verbiage contained in the Complaint, the causes of action that the Moors attempt to bring or assert are not apparent. Nevertheless, it appears from the face of the Complaint and a plain reading of it that no Defendant is a citizen of Pennsylvania and none of the alleged acts took place within the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

To initiate this litigation, the Moors filed a document entitled “Petition for Writ of Mandamus In Class Action” (hereinafter, the “Complaint”). (Docket No. 1). The Asbury Park Police Department thereafter filed a Motion to Dismiss. (Docket No. 2). Moor “Minister” Taj Tarik Bey filed a Motion in Opposition and Opposing Asbury Defendants’s Motion to Dismiss.

(Docket No. 5). Defendants Sosidian, Broyles and Spallina, all of whom are individual officers of the Asbury Park Police Department, filed a Motion to Join the Asbury Park Motion to Dismiss. (Docket No. 8). The Moors then filed a summary judgment motion with exhibits.

(Docket No. 10). The Wall Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction.

–  –  –

14). Defendants have moved to dismiss the Complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b). Now, it appears that the instant matter may be dismissed pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1), (3), and (6), as well as pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (dismissal for frivolity).

II. PROCEDURAL CHALLENGES TO THE COMPLAINT

Rule 12(b)(1) permits the Court to dismiss a claim for a lack of jurisdiction. Rule 12(b)(3) permits dismissal for improper venue. Rule 12(b)(6) permits the Court to dismiss all or part of an action for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Additionally, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) “[n]otwithstanding any filing fee, or any portion thereof, that may have been paid, the court shall dismiss the case at any time if the court determines that...

(B) the action or appeal – (I) is frivolous or malicious [and] (ii) fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted [...]."

III. DISCUSSION The Moors brought suit against all Defendants in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

From what the Court can divine from the Complaint, the Moors are attempting to allege violations of federal law. The Wall Defendants and the Asbury Defendants have filed a Motion To Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(3). A defendant may assert improper venue in a motion to dismiss. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(3). All of the Defendants appear to be residents of (or a public entity in) the State of New Jersey. The Moors have presented no allegation that connects any of the Defendants or the actions about which they seem to complain

–  –  –

Pennsylvania.

In a civil action where jurisdiction is not based on diversity of citizenship, venue is governed by 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). Here, from what the Court can divine from the Moors' filings, they bring this action pursuant to federal question jurisdiction. The Moors have failed to state or respond to the Motion to Dismiss explaining why venue is proper in this court. Section 1391(b)

states:

A civil action wherein jurisdiction is not founded solely on diversity of citizenship may, except as otherwise provided by law, be brought only in (1) a judicial district where any defendant resides, if all defendants reside in the same State, (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of property that is the subject of the action is situated, or (3) a judicial district in which any defendant may be found, if there is no district in which the action may otherwise be brought.

Here, using the framework of Section 1391(b), it is clear that no defendant resides in this judicial district, (2) neither the events nor omissions giving rise to the allegations nor any property involved in the instant dispute occurred or exists within this judicial district and (3) none of the defendants can be found in this judicial district. Accordingly, venue is improper in the instant matter.

Plaintiffs’ Complaint refers entirely to New Jersey actions and indicates that each of the named defendants are New Jersey residents or entities. Plaintiffs’ Complaint is devoid of any factual or legal basis that connects it to Pennsylvania. Based on these uncontroverted considerations, all of which emanate from Plaintiff's own filings, Defendants have met their

–  –  –

1052, 1054 (E.D. Pa. 2001) (citing Myers v. American Dental Association, 695 F.2d 716, 724 (3d Cir. 1982). The Court finds nothing in the Complaint to merit transfer to the District of New Jersey rather than outright dismissal of the action. Therefore, this matter shall be dismissed pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1), (3) and (6), 28 U.S.C. §1391(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a).

Because the Court has decided that it is without jurisdiction to hear the “merits” of the case, the Court declines to consider the Moors’ Motion for Summary Judgment, which is as unintelligible as their other filings.

IV. CONCLUSION Venue is improper in this Court and in violation of 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). There are no facts that would support finding either jurisdiction or venue in this Court. Additionally, the Moors' motion for summary judgment is denied inasmuch as it not only appears without merit, but because the language contained therein is unfocused and unintelligible. Finally, because the Complaint appears both frivolous, unintelligible and without merit, this entire matter is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).

–  –  –

AND NOW, this 28th day of September, 2005, upon consideration of the Moors’“Petition for Writ of Mandamus In Class Action” (the “Complaint”) (Docket No. 1), the Asbury Park Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 2), Moor “Minister” Taj Tarik Bey’s Motion in Opposition (Docket No. 5), Defendants Sosidian, Broyles and Spallina’s Motion to Join the Asbury Park Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 8), the Moors’ Summary Judgment Motion with exhibits (Docket No. 10), the Wall Township Police Department, Sargent Lancelotti and Sargent Brockley’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, (Docket No. 12) and the Moors’ “Amendment IX Complaint ‘At Law’ ” (Docket No. 14), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that

1. The Moors’ Summary Judgment Motion (Docket No. 10) is DENIED;

2. The Motions to Dismiss (Docket Nos. 2, 5, 8, 12) are GRANTED;

3. The Complaint (Docket No. 1) is DISMISSED with PREJUDICE and

–  –  –

-8-



Similar works:

«The sorcery of gender: sex, death and difference in East Java, Indonesia1 Konstantinos Retsikas Abstract: Drawing on ethnographic material from East Java, Indonesia, this article examines the intersections of sorcery and gender and suggests that sorcery is a form of exchange, which, as well as inducing misfortune, pain and death, evinces gender. Key here are the invocation and inversion of marriage transactions and wedding rituals, and an underlying conception of the person as inherently...»

«Remote Sens. 2014, 6, 2213-2238; doi:10.3390/rs6032213 OPEN ACCESS remote sensing ISSN 2072-4292 www.mdpi.com/journal/remotesensing Article A Synergetic Algorithm for Mid-Morning Land Surface Soil and Vegetation Temperatures Estimation Using MSG-SEVIRI Products and TERRA-MODIS Products Wei Zhao 1,2, Ainong Li 1,*, Jinhu Bian 1, Huaan Jin 1 and Zhengjian Zhang 1 1 Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041, China; E-Mails: zhaow@imde.ac.cn (W.Z.);...»

«The Aims and Objectives of Missionary Education in the Colonial Era in India Mavra Farooq In Colonial India Missionaries used education as a tool for propagating Christianity. The Scottish and Protestant Missions had profound ? on the educational set ups of India. This study examines the aims and objectives of the missionaries brought educational and religious ideas with them and pressures put forth by their own followers. The Missionaries had deep impact on the local culture. The Missionaries...»

«STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS Filed – February 8, 2010 PROVIDENCE, SC. SUPERIOR COURT TOWN OF JOHNSTON : : v. : PM No. 2008-5956 :INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD : OF POLICE OFFICERS, LOCAL 307 : DECISION LANPHEAR, J. This case is before the Court on Plaintiff Town of Johnston’s motion to vacate an arbitration award in favor of the International Brotherhood of Police Officers, Local 307 (“the Union”) and the Union’s motion to confirm the arbitration award. For the reasons...»

«Summary of Board of Management Meeting 237 9 December 2014 In attendance were: Colin Chatfield (Chairman) William Armitage Camilla Hamilton Terry Hone Lynda Needham Denise Poynter Michael Underwood David Walker John Lewis (Chief Executive and Deputy Company Secretary) Tim Roxburgh (Head of Property Services) Michael Ambrose (Finance Consultant) Jas Kaur (Company Secretary) Glen Dawson (Head of Marketing and Communications) Alastair Stewart (Head of Charitable Services Development) The following...»

«INTERNATIONAL ELECTION OBSERVATION MISSION (IEOM) The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Presidential and Early Parliamentary Elections, 27 April 2014 STATEMENT OF PRELIMINARY FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Skopje, 28 April 2014 – This Statement of Preliminary Findings and Conclusions is the result of a common endeavour involving the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (OSCE/ODIHR), the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly (OSCE PA) and the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of...»

«Argumentation in Higher Education Argumentation in Higher Education offers professors, lecturers, and researchers informative guidance for teaching effective argumentation skills to their undergraduate and graduate students. This professional guide aims to make the complex topic of argumentation open and transparent. Grounded in empirical research and theory but with student voices heard strongly throughout, this book fills the gap of argumentation instruction for the undergraduate and graduate...»

«Climate change and vulnerable people Public Social Private Partnership in adaptation Tokyo Institute of Technology Prof. Akihiko Morita, Ph.D 1. Climate change and vulnerable people It is now evident that our globe is warming due to the increase of GHG(Green House Gases) emission, mainly produced by human activities. The 4th Assessment Report of the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) states that 1) Warming of the climate system is unequivocal, as is now evident from observations of...»

«NI-LES′TUN ARCHAEOLOGY: THE BUSSMANN, BLUE BARN, AND OLD TOWN BANDON SITES BY MARK TVESKOV AND AMIE COHEN with contributions by Scott Byram, Kelly Derr, Don Ivy, Troy Linville, Aaron Reed, Ben Shotwell, and Zachariah Rodriguez SOULA Research Report 2007-1 Southern Oregon University Laboratory of Anthropology Ashland, Oregon 2007 © 2007 Southern Oregon University Laboratory of Anthropology Southern Oregon University Ashland, Oregon 97520 ii ABSTRACT This monograph reports on excavations...»

«Racial Disparities in Texas Department of Public Safety Traffic Stops, 20022014 Frank R. Baumgartner, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill1 Bryan D. Jones, University of Texas at Austin Julio Zaconet, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Colin Wilson, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Arvind Krishnamurthy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Texas House of Representatives Committee on County Affairs Rep. Garnet F. Coleman, Chair Prepared for November 18, 2015...»

«1 SCHOOL DIVISION Rules, Regulations & General Information OF THE (please read carefully) NORWOOD THANKSGIVING 1. Exhibits in Writing, Social Science, School Crafts and WEEKEND FAIR Posters will be judged Thursday at 6:00 PM. Entries Book Covers in these categories must be at the Fairgrounds before 2016 & 2017 Fairs 5:30 PM on Thursday. Building opens Thursday at 12:00 noon. norwoodfair@gmail.com 2. Exhibits in Flowers, Vegetables, Home Hobby and www.norwoodfair.com Baking will be...»

«The Best Foods and Diet for Cancer Treatment and Survivorship Watch the video of this transcript This archived video webchat features nutritionist Stacy Kennedy, MPH, RD, CSO, LDN, who discusses the optimal diet for cancer patients and survivors, and answers questions on the latest food fads and myths. Kennedy is a member of the Nutrition Services team at Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center ANNE DOERR: Hello and welcome to Dana-Farber’s Live Video Webchat Series. My name is Anne...»





 
<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.dissertation.xlibx.info - Dissertations, online materials

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.