WWW.DISSERTATION.XLIBX.INFO
FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Dissertations, online materials
 
<< HOME
CONTACTS



Pages:   || 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |   ...   | 36 |

«SCIENCE COUNCIL   CGIAR Report of the Sixth External Program and Management Review (EPMR) of the International Crops Research Institute for the ...»

-- [ Page 1 ] --

.

SCIENCE COUNCIL

 

CGIAR

Report of the

Sixth External Program and

Management Review (EPMR) of

the International Crops

Research Institute for the

Semi-Arid Tropics

(ICRISAT)

   

FEBRUARY 2009

~

.,. INTERNATIONAL CROPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR THE SEMI-ARID TROPICS

ICRISAT Science with a human face

March 12, 2009 Dr. Rudy Rabbinge Chair, Science Council Consultative Group on InternationalAgriculturalResearch Wageningen Internation Costerweg 50 6701 BH,Wageningen The Netherlands Dear Rudy, Under the coordination of the Science Council, the International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT) recently concluded its Sixth External Program and Management Review (EPMR) with Ken Cassman as the Chair of the Panel. The EPMR panel concludes that "ICRISATtoday is a thriving research institute. with a unique capacity to address poverty alleviation,food security, and natural resource protection in the SAT."

We would like to thank the Science Council for the very transparent and professional manner in which this exercise was conducted by the esteemed members of the panel.

We also greatly appreciate the exemplary technical support given by Sirkka Immonen of the Science CouncilSecretariat.

The EPMR report is a very positive report that highlights the quality of research at par with other CGIAR Centers with significant research spillovers, recognizing the strengthened partnership with NARS, the novel approach to private sector linkages and commending the strong leadership and leadership continuity. The views expressed by the panel as well as its positive and favorable assessment of the Institute were discussed and appreciated at our recent Governing Board meeting.

Attached are ICRISAT's responses to the recommendations of the EPMR.

ishes, ~ C~'CD Dar~ klA).

_ Stein W Bie

–  –  –

Recommendation 1 and Response The Panel recommends that ICRISAT continue to enhance investments in personnel and infrastructure in the SSA and use the potential for spillover to SSA as one of the explicit criteria used in prioritization of strategic investments in research conducted at the Patancheru headquarters.

Accepted We will continue enhancing and expanding our investments in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). We will use potential spillovers to SSA, and vice versa, as an explicit criterion for prioritization of research conducted in Asia through strategic planning and priority setting.

Recommendation 2 and Response

The Panel recommends that ICRISAT take ownership of and celebrate the strategic planning and research prioritization process based on: (i) proactive engagement of staff, Board, stakeholders, partners, and donors; (ii) analysis and understanding of recent crop yield and production trends, and projected growth in production and demand for its mandate crops, (iii) scenario analyses that utilizes geospatial analysis, ecosystem and crop modeling, and an appropriate socioeconomic framework.

Accepted Through a redesigned and revitalized strategic planning and priority setting process, the Governing Board and ICRISAT will effectively respond to the priorities of stakeholders for the sustainable development of semi-arid agriculture. Towards this, we will develop and implement a knowledge-based process that is inclusive, seeking inputs from key partners and stakeholders, more systematic and more explicit. This will build on our achievements, partnerships and comparative advantages in improving agricultural systems in the semi-arid tropics.

Recommendation 3 and Response

The Panel recommends a thorough analysis of past and likely future research spillovers between Africa and Asia to guide ICRISAT resource allocations between those two regions.

Accepted We will expand our work on studying research spillovers to guide strategic planning and resource allocation across regions and programs with special focus on identifying common biophysical and socioeconomic conditions that enable the adaptation and sharing of innovations.

1Recommendation 4 and Response

The Panel recommends that ICRISAT capitalize on its core social science strengths to enhance

activities in three areas and their interactions:

• research prioritization and project planning (at all levels within the Center);

• technology development and adaptation; and

• impact assessment Accepted We will continue harnessing our strengths in social science to improve research targeting, development, delivery and impacts. This will be institutionalized further as an integral part of our strategic research and planning process whereby insights gained from technology development and adaptation and impact assessment will be used as a guide.

Recommendation 5 and Response The Panel recommends that GT-IMPI work on the development of hypotheses that determine the IPG potential of ICRISAT’s downstream work on technology development, testing and adaptation.

Accepted Using impact assessment and other tools, ICRISAT will identify lessons and testable hypotheses that offer new insights to facilitate scaling up of technologies. We will implement this through wider dialogues among scientists across research themes and locations and with partners, including donors to demonstrate that our impact-oriented downstream work leads to IPGs.





Recommendation 6 and Response

The Panel recommends that ICRISAT expand expertise and research capacity in advanced biometrics for analysis of germplasm performance across multi-location environments using data generated across the network of multi-environment trials conducted by the Center and its partners across the Asian and African SAT.

Accepted In collaboration with strategic partners in both regions and with ARIs, we will enhance our biometrics capacity to capture the special opportunity available for ICRISAT to use multienvironment data, including genetic studies, in drawing lessons for future crop improvement research strategies.

Recommendation 7 and Response The Panel recommends that ICRISAT scale up its activities in marker development through strategic partnerships and resource targeting to accelerate the generation of high density reference maps that facilitate gene tagging for MAS in the mandate crops.

–  –  –

Recommendation 8 and Response The Panel recommends that ICRISAT establish minimal biotechnology facilities in Bamako or Niamey to allow DNA extraction, low throughput PCR-based genotyping and direct access to the bioinformatics platform at headquarters.

Accepted We will establish minimum facilities for DNA extraction in WCA and provide access by a critical mass of scientists in the region to genotyping services, bioinformatics platform, and training on how to use molecular data in crop breeding.

Recommendation 9 and Response The Panel recommends that ICRISAT build a core team with expertise in systems analysis, crop modelling, climate analysis, geo-spatial analysis, and economics located in Africa as a centerwide resource for research, strategic planning and impact assessment, and to concentrate the efforts now dispersed across regions.

Accepted In implementing this recommendation, ICRISAT will weigh the benefits of deploying such a core team at a single location in SSA against the need of retaining expertise in some of the recommended disciplines in various locations in the regions, and assemble the core team based on ICRISAT’s current expertise and prioritized research issues.

Recommendation 10 and Response

The Panel recommends that ICRISAT move rapidly to de-emphasise current mature lines of work, particularly in GT-AE (e.g. watershed management in Asia, microdosing, Africa market gardens, dryland eco-farms), and work that can be performed by the NARS (e.g. jatropha, pongamia, chickpea in rice fallow systems) to free up resources needed for new initiatives.

Accepted ICRISAT will adopt a nuanced approach in implementing this recommendation, guided by: (1) the availability and strengths of NARS and development-oriented partners, (2) need to provide technical support for such devolution, and (3) extent of remaining research issues for which ICRISAT has a comparative advantage.

3Recommendation 11 and Response

The Panel recommends that ICRISAT reorganize the structure and oversight of training and capacity building, and develop output quality criteria, as well as explicit expectations for mentoring and supervising research scholars, research fellows, and interns by ICRISAT scientists.

Accepted We will restructure and enhance the quality of our training and capacity building initiatives by developing performance and output indicators, fortifying consistency in selecting, mentoring and overseeing scholars and training participants and improving the mentoring capacity of our scientists. ICRISAT sees a particular need for an emphasis on SSA, and believes this should be a system-wide CGIAR priority.

Recommendation 12 and Response The Panel recommends that the Board bring greater rigor to the assessment of its own performance, and emphasize, in the orientation for new members, the responsibility of the Board to sustain its independence and its effectiveness.

Accepted Building on the present system, the Board is reassessing its current performance evaluation scheme to incorporate more rigor. The orientation of new members will underscore the critical importance of the Governing Board in effective governance and independence. In addition, the Board will continue to improve the rigor of its assessment of ICRISAT.

Recommendation 13 and Response The panel recommends that ICRISAT create succinct documents that synthesize 5-year trends in financial performance, priority setting and performance to give the Board more efficient and transparent access to information critical to oversight.

Accepted We will synthesize trends in ICRISAT’s institutional performance and prepare relevant succinct documents to assist the Board’s critical oversight.

Recommendation 14 and Response The Panel recommends that the Board adopt a multi-source evaluation process for the Director General that is rigorous and balanced and that provides the Board with more inflected and diverse inputs to the process. In addition to senior staff, the Board and DG should annually agree on a list of partners, donors and peers to be asked to participate in the evaluation.

–  –  –

Recommendation 15 and Response The Panel recommends that training be provided to senior scientific and administrative staff about how to develop and manage large projects, and how to balance research and project management.

Accepted Harnessing appropriate external and internal expertise and best practices, we will enhance the capacity of our senior scientific and administrative staff in developing and managing large projects.

Recommendation 16 and Response The Panel recommends that ICRISAT’s leadership clarify the role of PDMO in priority setting and send a clear signal about the drivers and determinants for establishing priorities for resource development.

Accepted We will further clarify PDMO’s role as recommended. Priority setting at ICRISAT will continue to be performed by its Research Committee (RC) vetted by Management and finally approved by the Governing Board. The PDMO plays a catalytic role in mobilizing resources.

Recommendation 17 and Response

The Panel recommends that ICRISAT must present ASP’s mission, structure and relationship to research in a more transparent fashion and re-assess ASP, either to narrow the ventures it pursues, or, in the interests of minimizing risks to the Center’s reputation, create a different structure with clearer boundaries between it and the Center.

Accepted We will carefully assess ASP’s mission, structure and function to further enhance its complementarity with ICRISAT’s research and resource development, and to minimize risk.

5 ______________________________________________________________________________________________

–  –  –

Dr Rudy Rabbinge Chair, Science Council Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research Wageningen International Costerweg 50 6701 BH, Wageningen The Netherlands Dr Ren Wang Director Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research The World Bank 1818 H Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20433, USA Dear Drs Rabbinge and Wang, On behalf of the Panel, I am pleased to transmit the Report of the Sixth External Programme and Management Review (EPMR) of the International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid

Tropics (ICRISAT). The Panel has reviewed ICRISAT’s performance in the four broad areas of:

i) mission, strategy and priorities; ii) quality and relevance of the science; iii) effectiveness and efficiency of management (including governance and finance); and iv) accomplishments and impacts. We have also addressed the list of strategic issues received from the Science Council.

The Panel finds ICRSIAT to be in the midst of a renewal after many years of retrenchment. It is a strong, well-funded research institute that has expanded its regional programs in SSA while also building strategic research capacity at its headquarters in Patancheru, India. The Center has strengthened its collaboration with the host country and also with NARS throughout the semiarid tropics (SAT). Overall the Panel commends ICRISAT for a well-balanced and substantive research portfolio. Going forward the Panel recommends that ICRISAT give greater emphasis to strategic planning and research prioritization to help guide decisions about the regional balance in resource allocation and about where to position the institute’s work across the research— development continuum.



Pages:   || 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |   ...   | 36 |


Similar works:

«STIPENDIARY STEWARDS’ REPORT CLUB: TASMANIAN RACING CLUB DATE: MONDAY, 8 FEBRUARY 2016 A O’CONNELL (CHAIRMAN), D TYSON, B FREE, A HARDING STEWARDS: F BATES, J AINSCOW, C BRYDON, K LAURENCE (CLERK OF SCALES) VETERINARY SURGEON: DR MARK BUCKERFIELD & DR JANET BUCKERFIELD SOFT (5) upgraded to GOOD (4) at 11.30 am further upgraded to GOOD TRACK: (3) at 2.50pm +3m – Entire Course RAIL: WEATHER: FINE PENETROMETER: 4.94 Riding Changes / Jockey Information Horse Rider Replaced by Reason Race 1 A...»

«A “proof-reading” of some issues in cryptography Ivan Damg˚ ard Department of Computer Science, BRICS, University of Aarhus Abstract. In this paper, we identify some issues in the interplay between practice and theory in cryptography, issues that have repeatedly appeared in different incarnations over the years. These issues are related to fundamental concepts in the field, e.g., to what extent we can prove that a system is secure and what theoretic results on security mean for practical...»

«PPP Possibilities for the Future of Mandaue City TOYO UNIVERSITY PPP GRADUATE SCHOOL November 2012 TOYO UNIVERSITY PPP GRADUATE SCHOOL Foreword March 2012, a group of professors from Toyo University visited the University of San Jose Recoletos (USJR) in Cebu to make academic presentations. At that occasion, we were invited to meet with Mayor Cortes of the City of Mandaue introduced by USJR. Mayor Cortes indicated his interest in hosting Toyo University team in summer of 2012 to his city to...»

«Geografía y Sistemas de Información Geográfica (GEOSIG). Revista digital del Grupo de Estudios sobre Geografía y Análisis Espacial con Sistemas de Información Geográfica (GESIG). Programa de Docencia e Investigación en Sistemas de Información Geográfica (PRODISIG). Universidad Nacional de Luján, Argentina. http://www.gesigproeg.com.ar (ISSN 1852-8031) Luján, Año 7, Número 7, 2015, Sección I: Artículos. pp. 101-109 El mapa social de Mar del Plata PATRICIA I. LUCERO Universidad...»

«COST Ac on TU1201 Urban Allotment Gardens in European Ci es Future, Challenges and Lessons Learned Lisbon Joint MC and WG Mee ng March 20th 22nd 2014 Event Report Laboratório Nacional de Engenharia Civil LNEC (Na onal Laboratory for Civil Engineering) Avenida do Brasil, 101 1700-066 Lisbon, Portugal Editors: Nazila Keshavarz Runrid Fox-Kämper Date of Publication: May 2014 Abbreviations: AG Allotment Garden CG Core Group COST European Cooperation in Science and Technology MC Management...»

«Governance and Infrastructure Development Challenges in the Kathmandu Valley Final Workshop Report February 2009 Kathmandu, Nepal Sponsored by the East-West Center's Urban Dialogue and Kathmandu Metropolitan City Government Table of Contents Executive Summary 1 Map 4 Aims and Objectives 5 Report 6 Action Plan 9 Agenda 10 Biographies 13 Participant List 16 Appendixes Kathmandu Valley Profile Metropolitan Governance in India: An Overview of Selected Cities Governance and Planning in Metro Manila...»

«PRACTICAL HARDNESS TESTING MADE SIMPLE Table of Contents Page 1. GENERAL 1 2. INTRODUCTION 3 3. BRINELL HARDNESS TESTING 9 4. VICKERS HARDNESS TESTING 14 5. ROCKWELL HARDNESS TESTING 17 6. INFORMATIONS 22 i PRACTICAL HARDNESS TESTING MADE SIMPLE 1. GENERAL Important facts and features to be known and remembered. This booklet intends to stress the significance of Hardness Testing and to dispel a few common misconceptions attributing to it inappropriate meanings and implications. It is dedicated...»

«Involve Implementation Manual How to Create a Welcoming Ministry for All Children and Youth in our Faith Communities To be used in conjunction with the book: Welcoming Children with Special Needs: A Guidebook for Faith Communities By: Sally Patton Embracing the Spirit of the Child www.embracechildspirit.org sally@embracechildspirit.org Funding Provided by: the Veatch Fund of Shelter Rock This manual is to be used by ministers, religious educators, and lay leaders who have completed the Involve...»

«th Proceedings of ENCIT 2012 14 Brazilian Congress of Thermal Sciences and Engineering Copyright © 2012 by ABCM November 18-22, 2012, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil COMPARISON STUDY: ETHANOL PRODUCTION INCREASE THROUGH THE INTRODUCTION OF BAGASSE ENZYMATIC HYDROLYSIS & SURPLUS ELECTRICITY INCREASE, IN ETHANOL DISTILLERIES Reynaldo Palacios-Bereche, reynaldo.palacios@ufabc.edu.br Marcelo Modesto, marcelo.modesto@ufabc.edu.br Adriano Ensinas, adriano.ensinas@ufabc.edu.br Center of Engineering,...»

«Sermon #1809 Metropolitan Tabernacle Pulpit 1 MAY I? NO. 1809 A SERMON DELIVERED ON THURSDAY EVENING, NOVEMBER 6, 1884, BY C. H. SPURGEON, AT THE METROPOLITAN TABERNACLE, NEWINGTON. “If I may.”—Matthew 9:21. THE woman in the narrative was fully persuaded that if she did but touch our Lord’s garment she would be made whole. What she had heard and seen concerning Jesus made her sure of His superabundant power to heal the sick. A touch would do it. Yes, even a touch of His clothes. Her one...»

«Watched Literals for Constraint Propagation in Minion Ian P. Gent1, Chris Jefferson2, and Ian Miguel1 1 School of Computer Science, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife, UK 2 Oxford University Computing Laboratory, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK {ipg, ianm}@dcs.st-and.ac.uk, Chris.Jefferson@comlab.ox.ac.uk Abstract. Efficient constraint propagation is crucial to any constraint solver. We show that watched literals, already a great success in the satisfiability community, can be used...»

«Billing, Coding and ICD‐10 for Medically Indicated Contact Lenses PRESENTED BY CLARKE D. NEWMAN, OD, FAAO GAS PERM LENS INSTITUTE 2016 COPE #: 47591-PM Conflict Disclaimer Clinical Research Paid Consultant/Lecturer   Alcon Alcon   Expert Testimony  Allergan   Contributing Editor: AMO  Contact Lens Spectrum B+L   No Proprietary Interest in CE Wire  Any Subjects Discussed EyePrint PRO   FDA “Off-Label” Uses will GPLI not be discussed  JJVC  OPTOS...»





 
<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.dissertation.xlibx.info - Dissertations, online materials

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.