WWW.DISSERTATION.XLIBX.INFO
FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Dissertations, online materials
 
<< HOME
CONTACTS



Pages:   || 2 |

«Office of Audit, Region 6 Audit Report Number: 2015-FW-1004 Fort Worth, TX August 17, 2015 To: Floyd R. Duran, Program Center Coordinator, Office of ...»

-- [ Page 1 ] --

Mesilla Valley Public Housing

Authority, Las Cruces, NM

Low-Rent and Housing Choice Voucher Programs

Office of Audit, Region 6 Audit Report Number: 2015-FW-1004

Fort Worth, TX August 17, 2015

To: Floyd R. Duran, Program Center Coordinator, Office of Public Housing, 6BPHO

//signed//

From: Gerald R. Kirkland, Regional Inspector General for Audit, Fort Worth Region,

6AGA

Subject: The Mesilla Valley Public Housing Authority, Las Cruces, NM, Miscalculated Housing Choice Vouchers and Incorrectly Paid Rental Assistance Attached is the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Office of Inspector General’s (OIG) final results of our review of the Mesilla Valley Public Housing Authority’s low-rent and Housing Choice Voucher programs.

HUD Handbook 2000.06, REV-4, sets specific timeframes for management decisions on recommended corrective actions. For each recommendation without a management decision, please respond and provide status reports in accordance with the HUD Handbook. Please furnish us copies of any correspondence or directives issued because of the audit.

The Inspector General Act, Title 5 United States Code, section 8M, requires that OIG post its publicly available reports on the OIG Web site. Accordingly, this report will be posted at http://www.hudoig.gov.

If you have any questions or comments about this report, please do not hesitate to call me at (817)-978-9309.

Audit Report Number: 2015-FW-1004 Date: August 17, 2015 The Mesilla Valley Public Housing Authority, Las Cruces, NM, Miscalculated Housing Choice Vouchers and Incorrectly Paid Rental Assistance Highlights What We Audited and Why At the request of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) Office of Public Housing in Albuquerque, NM, we conducted a review of the Mesilla Valley Public Housing Authority. The Office of Public Housing estimated that the Authority could lose nearly $1 million by the end of 2014 because it had leased only 983 of its 1,607 vouchers. Our objectives were to determine the extent, cause, and impact of not leasing all of its vouchers, and whether the Authority implemented its low-rent and Housing Choice Voucher programs in accordance with HUD regulations.

What We Found We did not determine the extent, cause, and impact of the Authority not leasing all of its vouchers because HUD’s Office of Public Housing changed the housing assistance payment reserve offset formula, which meant that the Authority would no longer lose nearly $1 million at the end of 2014. The Albuquerque, NM, Office of Public Housing began working with the Authority to lease more vouchers, and the Authority took other actions to resolve the other deficiencies.

However, we found deficiencies in 9 of 10 randomly selected program participant files. Each of the files contained one or more deficiencies, including payment calculation errors, incorrect payments, and missing documents to support participant and unit eligibility. These errors occurred because the Authority did not maintain knowledgeable in-house program staff, did not maintain continuity when it switched between contractors and in-house staff to process program files, and did not ensure staff followed the Housing Choice Voucher program policies and procedures. As a result, the Authority overpaid $2,139 in assistance and required participants to overpay $22. Further, it paid $21,426 for participants and units with unsupported eligibility and made an additional $53 in unexplained payments. We found no deficiencies in the Authority’s low-rent program.

What We Recommend We recommend that the Authority (1) repay $2,139 for incorrect housing assistance payments, (2) reimburse $22 to a family that was overcharged, (3) support or repay $21,479, and (4) take steps to ensure staff follows procedures when calculating rent and maintain adequate supporting documentation.

Table of Contents Background and Objectives

Results of Audit

The Authority Incorrectly Calculated and Paid Assistance and Could Not Support Program Participant and Unit Eligibility for Its Housing Choice Voucher Program

Scope and Methodology

Internal Controls

Appendixes

A. Schedule of Questioned Costs and Funds To Be Put to Better Use

B. Auditee Comments and OIG's Evaluation

2 Background and Objectives On January 1, 2012, the City of Las Cruces and Dona Ana County had an intergovernmental agreement that established the Mesilla Valley Public Housing Authority. The Authority was previously known as the Housing Authority of the City of Las Cruces. The Authority has a fivemember board of commissioners, two of whom are appointed by the mayor of Las Cruces and two of whom are appointed by the Board of County Commissioners. The fifth member of the Authority’s board is a public housing resident. The primary purpose of the Authority is to provide safe, decent, and sanitary housing for low- and moderate-income families in Las Cruces, NM, and Dona Ana County, NM.

The Authority owns and manages 253 low-rent public housing units and has authority to issue up to 1,607 housing choice vouchers. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) provided operating subsidies, Public Housing Capital Fund program funds, and American Recovery and Reinvestment Act funds to the Authority to manage, maintain, and operate its public housing developments. The Authority disbursed more than $3 million in Housing Choice Voucher program funds in fiscal year 2012, $4.9 million in 2013, and $5.6 million in 2014.





The Authority hired a contractor to manage its program from March 2010 through October 2013.

In 2013, the Authority decided to bring its program back in-house. Between August 2013 and February 2014, the Authority hired two managers for the program and fired them because they did not meet the executive director’s expectations. When the in-house managers did not work out, the Authority signed a contract with the Eastern Regional Housing Authority to manage the program from February through December 2014 and placed it under the oversight of the public housing program manager. The Eastern Region Housing Authority revised the contract in August 2014 from “managing” to “overseeing” the program for the Authority. The Authority hired Bernalillo County Housing Authority to manage its program in February 2015, but this was after our audit period ended.

Our objectives were to determine (1) whether the Authority operated its low-rent and Housing Choice Voucher programs in accordance with HUD regulations; (2) the extent, cause, and impact of not leasing all of its vouchers; and (3) whether the factors that led to the reduction in Housing Choice Voucher program participants impacted its low-rent program.

3Results of Audit

The Authority Incorrectly Calculated and Paid Assistance and Could Not Support Program Participant and Unit Eligibility for Its Housing Choice Voucher Program The Authority had deficiencies in 9 of 10 randomly selected program files. Five of the nine files had calculation and payment errors. One file was missing documentation. The three remaining files had both calculation and payment errors and were missing documentation. These errors occurred because the Authority did not maintain knowledgeable in-house program staff, did not maintain continuity when it switched between contractors and in-house staff to process the program files, and did not ensure staff followed the Housing Choice Voucher program policies and procedures. As a result, for the 10 files reviewed, the Authority overpaid $2,139 in program assistance and required participants to overpay $22. Further, it paid $21,426 for participants and units with unsupported eligibility and made an additional $53 in unexplained payments.

Deficiencies in Program Files The Authority’s files contained several types of errors. These errors included incorrect payment standards, incorrect allowance deductions, not implementing payment changes at the appropriate time, unexplained payments, and missing eligibility documents. Table 1 shows the types of errors. Table 2 shows the effect of the errors on assistance payments.

–  –  –

Incorrect Payment Standards As shown in table 1, the Authority did not use correct payment standards for 5 of 10 randomly selected program participants. A payment standard is the amount generally needed to rent a moderately priced dwelling unit in the local housing market, which is used to calculate the amount of housing assistance a family will receive. The payment standard for the family is the lower of the payment standard amount for the family unit size or the size of the dwelling unit rented by the family.

In sample 2, for example, the Authority failed to use appropriate payment standards during recertification of a two-bedroom unit. In July 2012, the Authority correctly calculated the family’s move-in payment standard of $622 and paid it correctly. However, it incorrectly calculated the payment standard when it recertified the family in 2013, resulting in overpayments.

The Authority increased a payment standard before it should have. An approved payment standard increase from $622 to $696 was effective January 2013. It later decreased back to $622, effective May 2013. According to 24 CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) 982.505(c)(4), when there is an increase in the payment standard amount during the housing assistance payment contract term, the increased payment standard amount must be used to calculate the monthly housing assistance payment for the family beginning at the effective date of the family’s first regular reexamination on or after the effective date of the increase. Rather than using the $622 1 $45 unexplained payment + $2,072 payments based on missing documentation = $2,117 unsupported payments 2 $8 unexplained payment + $2,473 payments based on missing documentation = $2,481 unsupported payments 5 payment standard, the Authority used the $696 payment standard. As a result, in July 2013 it paid $531 in housing assistance rather than the appropriate amount of $493, an overpayment of $38.

One month later, the family composition changed from three to four family members, which resulted in a new notice of rent amount. The Authority continued to use the incorrect $696 (twobedroom unit) payment standard for recertification, which caused it to overpay a total of $418 for the period August 2013 through June 2014. Following the family’s July 2014 recertification, the Authority overpaid $2 monthly, a total of $8 from July through October 2014. In total, the Authority overpaid $464 in housing assistance for the family. The overpayments were an ineligible cost that the Authority should reimburse to its program.

Incorrect Allowance Deductions As shown in table 1, the Authority did not use the correct utility allowance deductions for 4 of 10 families reviewed. A utility allowance is the amount that a housing agency determines is necessary to subsidize the resident’s reasonable utility costs. The utility allowance schedule must be determined based on the typical cost of utilities and services paid by energyconservative households that occupy housing of similar sizes and type in the same locality. The Authority must maintain a utility allowance schedule for all tenant-paid utilities, the cost of tenant-supplied refrigerators and ranges, and other tenant-paid housing services.

For example, in sample 5, the Authority failed to use the appropriate utility allowance deductions to calculate payments. In April 2013, the family’s utility allowance calculation for a two-bedroom unit with appliances for heating, cooking, air conditioning, water heater, and other electrical services was $118; however, the Authority entered $122 as the utility allowance. The error caused the Authority to overpay $4 per month for rental assistance, or a total of $48 for the period April 2013 through March 2014. The overpayments were an ineligible cost that the Authority should reimburse to its program.

Failure To Implement New Payments on Time As shown in table 1, the Authority did not implement new payments at the appropriate time for 4 of the 10 families. The Authority should have paid the landlords the lesser of the monthly housing assistance or the actual rent for the unit.

In sample 3, for example, the Authority mailed a notice of rent adjustment letter on July 15, 2013, notifying the family that effective September 1, 2013, the housing assistance payments to the landlord would change from $396 to $349. However, on September 3, 2013, the Authority paid the landlord $396. Because the Authority did not implement the new payment, effective September 1, 2013, it overpaid $47 for September 2013. The overpayments were an ineligible cost that the Authority should reimburse to its program.

Unexplained Payments The Authority made unexplained payments for 2 of 10 sampled families. For example, in sample 7, the Authority correctly paid the landlord $138 on January 3, 2013. On the same day, the Authority made an adjustment payment to the landlord for $45 for the same family and unit.

The February 1, 2013, payment to the landlord was again $138. The Authority was unable to 6 provide supporting documentation or a reasonable justification for the $45 payment. The Authority made another unexplained payment of $8 for sample 9 on September 4, 2012. These payments were unsupported costs. The Authority should provide evidence that they were appropriate or reimburse the $53 3 to its Housing Choice Voucher program.

Missing Documentation Initially, 9 of the 10 sampled paper files were missing a total of 36 necessary documents. During the audit, the Authority located many of the missing documents in its management contractor’s online system and in the Eastern Regional Housing Authority’s computer system. The Authority located all but five documents from five different files.

The missing documents included an inspection report (one instance), results of a criminal background check (one instance), a form HUD-50058 (one instance), and income verification (two instances). The inspection report, income verification documents, and criminal background check are critical documents supporting the participants’ and units’ eligibility for assistance.



Pages:   || 2 |


Similar works:

«Linuxcon 2012 Sleep Monitoring with Linux and Arduino http://marc.merlins.org/linux/talks/ArduinoSleepMonitoring/ Marc MERLIN marc_soft@merlins.org Sleep Apnea How restless are you at night? ➢ Do you snore? ➢ Do you know if you sleep on your back, and how much? ➢ Have you been told you stop breathing at night and then ➢ gasp for air? Do you wake up tired after a full night, need to take naps ➢ in the middle of the day? 5-10% of middle age men (half that for women) have ➢ sleep...»

«Speeding Up and Boosting Diverse Density Learning James R. Foulds and Eibe Frank Department of Computer Science, University of Waikato, New Zealand {jf47,eibe}@cs.waikato.ac.nz Abstract. In multi-instance learning, each example is described by a bag of instances instead of a single feature vector. In this paper, we revisit the idea of performing multi-instance classification based on a point-and-scaling concept by searching for the point in instance space with the highest diverse density. This...»

«Praveen Sekhar Biographical Sketch Praveen Kumar Sekhar Electrical Engineering, School of Engineering and Computer Science (ENCS) Washington State University Vancouver (WSU Vancouver), Vancouver, WA 98686 (360) 5469186 (Office) praveen.sekhar@vancouver.wsu.edu (360) 546-9438 (FAX) Education Coimbatore Institute of Technology, India Electrical Engineering BE 2001 University of South Florida (USF), Tampa. FL Electrical Engineering MS 2005 University of South Florida (USF), Tampa, FL Electrical...»

«An International Journal for Students of Theological and Religious Studies Volume 35 Issue 2 July 2010 MINORITY REPORT: Not in the Public Interest 195 Carl Trueman B. B. Warfield on Creation and Evolution 198 Fred G. Zaspel Why Evangelicals Should Ignore Brian McLaren: How 212 the New Testament Requires Evangelicals to Render a Judgment on the Moral Status of Homosexuality Denny Burk A Member of the Family or a Stranger? A Review Article 228 of Ancient Near Eastern Themes in Biblical Theology...»

«The Ultimate Guide for Everything Twitter Twitter isn’t just a cute way for keeping in instant touch with friends on mobile phones anymore. It has ramped up quickly to be the search engine of choice for some with its human driven results. Applications galore allow you to find friends all over the world with similar interests and keep up with them in real time. Businesses can form instant direct relationships with their customer bases simply by signing up and using the service regularly, and...»

«SECTION 05520 HANDRAILS AND RAILINGS PART 1 GENERAL 1.1 SECTION INCLUDES A. Aluminum component railing systems. 1.2 RELATED SECTIONS A. Section 03300 CastInPlace Concrete;7 coordination with substrate. B. Section 06100 Rough Carpentry: Blocking requirements and installation. C. Section 06410 Interior Architectural Woodwork: Wood rail cap installed on railing system. 1.3 REFERENCES A. American Architectural Manufacturers Association (AAMA) 2604 Voluntary Specification, Performance Requirements...»

«On some ways to test Tagalog nominalism from a crosslinguistic perspective Mark C. Baker Rutgers University Daniel Kaufman’s core proposal is that much of what is typologically special about Tagalog syntax is rooted in the language having nouns but not verbs as its core lexical categories. He sees this at two levels. First, bare roots in Tagalog are nominal rather than verbal; for example, bili on its own means ‘price bought for’ rather than ‘buy’. Second, he claims that fully...»

«1 Getting Started with Exodus By Lauren Stouffer and Ted Hildebrandt Copyright © 2012 Introduction to Exodus Exodus, the second book in the Torah, begins where Genesis ended—with the children of Israel living in Egypt. The original Hebrew title of the book “and these are the names,” is taken from the first two words of the book in the Hebrew. The title “Exodus” (“the way out”) is taken from the Greek Septuagint, or LXX1 explicating the content of the book as being about the way...»

«Chapter from: Genetic and Cultural Evolution of Cooperation Edited by P. Hammerstein, 2003 ISBN 0-262-08326-4 © The MIT Press 3 Cooperation without Counting The Puzzle of Friendship Joan B. Silk Department of Anthropology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, U.S.A. ABSTRACT Cooperative relationships, which involve the exchange of altruistic behaviors that are costly to the actor and beneficial to the recipient, are thought to be the product of kin selection or reciprocal altruism....»

«SOME REMARKS ON THE ISOPERIMETRIC PROBLEM FOR THE HIGHER EIGENVALUES OF THE ROBIN AND WENTZELL LAPLACIANS J. B. KENNEDY School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia J.Kennedy@maths.usyd.edu.au Abstract. We consider the problem of minimising the kth eigenvalue, k ≥ 2, of the (p-)Laplacian with Robin boundary conditions with respect to all domains in RN of given volume M. When k = 2, we prove that the second eigenvalue of the p-Laplacian is minimised by the...»

«DEFIANCE SILVER CORP. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS For the period ended September 30, 2013 The following Management Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) of Defiance Silver Corp. (the “Company”) for the three months ended September 30, 2013 has been prepared as of November 27, 2013, and is intended to be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2013, together with the notes thereto, which are available on the SEDAR...»

«The Evolution of a Partnership: A Phenomenological Examination of Co-Teaching Relationships A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty Of Drexel University By R. Lynne Ruvalcaba In partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree Of Doctor of Education February 2015 © 2015 R. Lynne Ruvalcaba. All Rights Reserved This Ed.D. Dissertation Committee from The School of Education at Drexel University certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: The Evolution of a...»





 
<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.dissertation.xlibx.info - Dissertations, online materials

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.