WWW.DISSERTATION.XLIBX.INFO
FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Dissertations, online materials
 
<< HOME
CONTACTS



Pages:   || 2 |

«United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 15-3602 _ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. James ...»

-- [ Page 1 ] --

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 15-3602

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

James Vernon McKnight

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock

____________

Submitted: September 23, 2016

Filed: October 31, 2016

[Unpublished]

____________

Before WOLLMAN, BRIGHT, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

A jury found James Vernon McKnight guilty of conspiring to possess with intent to distribute, possessing with intent to distribute, and distributing controlled substances and controlled-substance analogues, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 813, 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(C), and 846. The district court1 sentenced McKnight to time served—the seven months during which McKnight had been in custody prior to sentencing, three years of supervised release, and a $300 special assessment.

McKnight appeals, arguing that the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions. We affirm.

In July 2012, police received information that smokable synthetic cannabinoids, commonly called “K2,” “potpourri,” or “incense” (K2), were being sold from McKnight’s Starstruck Video store in Conway, Arkansas. Acting on the tip, an undercover officer entered the store on July 11 and asked an employee, later identified as McKnight, for “smoke,” street terminology for K2. McKnight led the officer to a back office, unlocked a three-drawer toolbox, selected a package of K2 from several options, placed the package in a black DVD case, and accepted $20 for the sale. McKnight did not enter the sale in the cash register or provide the officer a sales receipt. McKnight told the officer that if he returned to the store with the black DVD case, store employees would understand that he had purchased K2 in the past and that he wished to purchase more. Later testing of the contents of the package purchased by the officer revealed that it contained 1.3 grams of AM-2201, a schedule I controlled substance as of July 9, 2012, and a controlled-substance analogue prior to that date.

In August 2012, the undercover officer returned to Starstruck Video with the black DVD case and again asked an employee for “smoke.” The employee sold the officer a 1.5-gram package of “Snoopy” brand K2 for $10, explaining that the store had no other K2 brands available for sale because they were illegal. The employee placed the package in the empty DVD case; he did not enter the sale in the cash register or provide a sales receipt. Later testing revealed that the package contained 1 The Honorable J. Leon Holmes, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

-2grams of UR-144, a controlled-substance analogue. In September, the officer returned to the store with the black DVD case and again asked for “smoke.” Keith Burford, McKnight’s business partner, advised the officer that they were out of K2 but were expecting a shipment later that day. After the officer told Burford that he was “just trying to get right,” street terminology indicating a desire to get high, Burford motioned the officer into his office and retrieved a cloth bundle, which he unfolded to reveal a gallon-sized plastic bag full of smaller packages of a green substance. Burford told the officer that he manufactured this K2 himself, that he had watched two people get “messed up” after smoking the substance, and that he could provide larger quantities if the officer wanted to sell it to his friends. The officer paid $20 for a 3-gram package of the green substance, and Burford gave the officer another package of what he described as poor quality product free of charge. Burford placed both packages in the officer’s DVD case. Later testing revealed that the two packages contained 3.0 grams and 2.4 grams, respectively, of UR-144. The undercover officer returned to Starstruck Video with the black DVD case a final time in October and again asked for “smoke.” An employee recommended “Scooby Snax” brand K2 and retrieved a package from under the counter, commenting that other purchasers had given the product good reviews. The officer paid $30 for a 4.0-gram package, which the employee placed in the officer’s DVD case. Later testing revealed that the package contained 3.8 grams of a non-controlled substance.

On October 18, 2012, officers executed a search warrant at Starstruck Video, seizing numerous packages of K2; packaging materials, including plastic baggies of various sizes; a grinder; and several empty black DVD cases. Officers also seized supplier invoices, U.S. Postal Service (USPS) Priority Mail packages, and documents identifying Maxwell Mason as a supplier of K2 products. McKnight, who was present during the search, informed the officers that he had been selling K2 products for about five months for $25 to $35 per package, but that he received only a portion of the sales price because he was selling the products on consignment for Mason.

Thirteen of the seized K2 packages were tested; eight contained AM-2201, XLR-11,

-3and UR-144, and five contained non-controlled substances. At that time, AM-2201 was a schedule I controlled substance, and XLR-11 and UR-144 were controlledsubstance analogues.2 A few days after execution of the search warrant, officers intercepted a USPS package addressed to “James” at Starstruck Video. Because they suspected the package would contain additional K2 products, the officers contacted McKnight, relayed their suspicions, and sought his consent to open the package.





McKnight denied having ordered any K2 products and agreed to allowing the officers to open the package in his presence. The package contained multiple packets of various K2 products, some of which later tested positive for XLR-11.

On September 11, 2013, a federal grand jury returned an indictment charging McKnight and others with the offenses set forth above. McKnight proceeded to trial, while each of his coconspirators pleaded guilty and agreed to testify against McKnight. In addition to the undercover officer’s and lab analysts’ testimony, the government offered the testimony of coconspirators Mason, Burford, and Justin Taylor. Mason testified that when he first bought K2 products from McKnight, the products were kept in frozen-food boxes in a freezer in the back office. At some point, Mason began buying K2 products in bulk and arranged with McKnight to sell those products on consignment at Starstruck Video. McKnight recorded sales of Mason’s K2 products on a separate ledger page, which was titled “Mason back room stuff.” Mason often packaged his K2 products for delivery to McKnight in sealed USPS packages with appropriate postage—even though the packages were never actually mailed through the postal system—because he understood that a warrant was required before officers could open such packages. Mason testified that he attempted to stay informed regarding the legality of the products he was selling, but he admitted to knowing that all of his K2 products were illegal. He stated that McKnight 2 UR-144 and XLR-11 were temporarily placed into schedule I on May 16, 2013, and that temporary placement became final on May 11, 2016. See Schedules of Controlled Substances: Placement of UR-144, XLR11, and AKB48 into Schedule I, 81 Fed. Reg. 29,142 (May 11, 2016) (to be codified at 21 C.F.R. 1308).

-4distributed the K2 products in black DVD cases from under the counter because he was attempting to keep the sales “under the radar.” He testified that McKnight originally insisted on having lab reports to confirm the legality of each K2 product sold at Starstruck Video but that they later discussed selling products for which there were no such reports or for which he would simply falsify old lab reports. Mason acknowledged that he knew his customers were buying K2 products to smoke to get high and that he never knew a customer to buy the products for another purpose. He also stated that his K2 products were not for use as aphrodisiacs nor had he ever seen them advertised for such purpose in Starstruck Video. Finally, Mason acknowledged that he delivered K2 products to the store in a manner that was designed to avoid detection, that K2 products were sold from under the counter and packaged in black DVD cases, that he advised Starstruck employees and others to keep the products secret, and that he engaged in these efforts at subterfuge because he understood that his conduct was illegal.

Burford testified that when Starstruck Video began selling K2 products labeled “potpourri,” McKnight told him that the product was “synthetic marijuana.” Burford also stated that the K2 “potpourri” commanded far higher prices than did the actual potpourri sold at the store. Burford testified that he and McKnight discussed placing some of the K2 “potpourri” in a bowl as if it were actual potpourri in the event that “anything came up,” i.e., in the event that law enforcement entered the store. Burford stated that he and McKnight discussed whether the K2 products were legal and that McKnight had obtained information from suppliers regarding the products’ legality.

Burford admitted, however, that despite these inquiries, McKnight must have known that the K2 products were illegal because they “kept it so secret.” Burford admitted that it was his idea to use the black DVD cases to hide the K2 products for purchasers, because he believed that it would look suspicious for the 30-40 customers who bought these products each day to leave the store without evidence of having purchased anything. Burford confirmed that the K2 products were not displayed or available for sale in the adult section of the store, but were instead kept in

-5McKnight’s office. He stated that even though the packages were labeled “potpourri” that was “not for human consumption,” he and McKnight both understood that the K2 products were not actually potpourri and that customers were buying the K2 products to smoke to get high.

Taylor testified that in 2012 his roommate purchased K2 products from McKnight at Starstruck Video. Taylor explained that he initially accompanied his roommate to the store until employees became familiar enough with him to sell him K2 products directly. When he began to purchase K2 products himself, he was taken into an office where the K2 products were kept in a locked toolbox. Taylor testified that purchasers bought K2 products to smoke to get high and that no one who purchased the products used them as incense. Taylor understood that Mason shipped K2 products in USPS packages because law enforcement could not search those packages without a warrant. Finally, Taylor testified that Mason told him that the K2 products were illegal but that he never directly discussed the matter with McKnight.

At the close of the government’s case-in-chief, McKnight moved for judgment of acquittal, which the district court denied. McKnight then testified, asserting that he sold the K2 products as “incense” and “herbal Viagra,” that the K2 products were not intended for human consumption and were so labeled, that they were not meant to be smoked to get high, and that he displayed a disclaimer in the store warning that the K2 products were not for human consumption. McKnight stated that he kept the K2 products under the counter and in a back room because, as with the adult videos and novelties he sold, he wanted to keep them away from underage customers. He instructed his employees to place purchases of K2 products in black DVD cases for discretion and privacy purposes, just as he did for purchases of adult videos.

McKnight testified that his suppliers, including Mason, assured him that the K2 products he was selling were legal and that he conducted independent research and obtained lab reports to determine that the ingredients listed on the K2 packages were not controlled substances or controlled-substance analogues. McKnight generally

-6denied that he entered into an agreement with the other conspirators to possess or distribute controlled substances or controlled-substance analogues. After the close of all the evidence, the district court denied McKnight’s renewed motion for judgment of acquittal, and the jury returned a guilty verdict.

McKnight appeals, arguing that because the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction, the district court erred in denying his motions for judgment of acquittal. We review de novo the denial of a motion for judgment of acquittal, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdict and reversing “only if no reasonable jury could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.” United States v. Ramos, 814 F.3d 910, 915 (8th Cir.) (quoting United States v. Brooks, 715 F.3d 1069, 1081 (8th Cir. 2013)), cert. denied, Nos. 16WL 3633118 & 2016 WL 3633122 (Oct. 3, 2016). We apply this exacting standard “even when the conviction rests entirely on circumstantial evidence.” Id. (quoting United States v. Tillman, 765 F.3d 831, 833 (8th Cir. 2014)).

McKnight first argues that the evidence was insufficient to prove that he possessed the requisite knowledge to support his convictions for possessing with intent to distribute and for distributing a controlled substance or controlled-substance analogue. Although “[k]nowledge is one element of [a] drug-distribution charge[] under 18 U.S.C. § 841(a),” id., the government is “not required to prove that the defendant actually knew the exact nature of the substance with which he was dealing,” id. (quoting United States v. Sheppard, 219 F.3d 766, 769 (8th Cir. 2000)).

The government need show only “a general criminal intent, i.e., awareness that the substance possessed was a controlled substance of some kind.” Id.; see also United States v. Qattoum, 826 F.3d 1062 1065 (8th Cir. 2016). In cases involving a controlled-substance analogue, the government may establish the requisite knowledge either by showing that the defendant “knew [he] was dealing with some controlled substance, regardless of whether [he] knew the identity of the substance,” or by showing that the defendant “knew the specific features of the substance that make it

-7a controlled substance analogue.” Ramos, 814 F.3d at 916 (citing McFadden v.



Pages:   || 2 |


Similar works:

«Cancer and Oral Care of the Patient Falace, chapter 26 Burket, chapter 7 Cancer is a condition that is characterized by uncon trolled growth of aberrant neoplastic cells. Cancerous cells kill by destructive invasion of tissues, that is, by direct extension and spread to distant sites by metastasis through blood, lymph, or serosal surfaces. Malignant cells arise from genetic and acquired mutations,  chromosomal translocations, and overexpression or underexpression of factors (oncogenes,...»

«Minster School Inspection report Unique Reference Number 122898 Local Authority Nottinghamshire Inspection number 380555 Inspection dates 23–24 November 2011 Reporting inspector Kevin Sheldrick HMI This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. Type of school Secondary School category Voluntary aided Age range of pupils 7–18 Gender of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils in the sixth form Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 1601 Of which, number on...»

«LOD (Level of Detail) in OpenSceneGraph Level of detail is a tool used to cut corners on visual fidelity in situations where the observer is unlikely to notice or care about the apparent degradation. There are many forms of LOD, including continuous LOD (CLOD), which is often used for terrain models, and discrete LOD which is used for objects that cannot be represented by some sort of continuously variable approximation by mathematical function. Continuous LOD is not discussed here. To employ...»

«RRITJE ALBANIA COMPETITIVENESS ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT FINAL REPORT USAID Contract No. 182-C-00-00-0002-00 February 21, 2014 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Chemonics International Inc.RRITJE ALBANIA COMPETITIVENESS ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT FINAL REPORT USAID Contract No. 182-C-00-00-0002-00 The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United...»

«Identity Theft INTRODUCTION In the course of a busy day, you may write a check at the grocery store, charge tickets to a ball game, rent a car, mail your tax returns, call home on your cell phone, order new checks or apply for a credit card. Chances are you don't give these everyday transactions a second thought. But someone else may. The 1990's spawned a new variety of crooks called identity thieves. Their stock in trade are your everyday transactions. Each transaction requires you to share...»

«Pensions: Individual Protection 2014 _ Guidance Note 10 December 2013 Updated on 22 August 2014 1 Contents Page Introduction 3 Chapter 1 Overview 4 Chapter 2 Applying for IP 2014 7 Chapter 3 Valuing savings 14 Chapter 4 Pension debits 32 Chapter 5 Taking benefits 36 Chapter 6 Additional information for scheme 41 administrators 2 Introduction As announced at Budget 2013, and following consultation, parliamentary scrutiny and Royal Assent, legislation was introduced in Finance Act 2014 to...»

«WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS HIGHLIGHTS OF PRESCRIBING INFORMATION  Immediate Post-Injection Reaction (flushing, chest pain, palpitations, These highlights do not include all the information needed to use anxiety, dyspnea, throat constriction, and/or urticaria), generally GLATOPA™ safely and effectively. See full prescribing information for GLATOPA™. transient and self-limiting (5.1) GLATOPA™ (glatiramer acetate injection), for subcutaneous use  Chest pain, usually transient (5.2)...»

«Assamite Sorcery Packet A Genre Resource Written for One World by Night By David Herold & Bryan Delius [September 28th, 2006] Objectives: This packet is a genre resource for Assamite Sorcery either printed by White Wolf, or recognized with in OWBN. This document is a representation of the collective support of OWBN’s council members, and thus enforceable as official OWBN genre. This specifically includes, but is not exclusive to, the ranking and rarity system here in listed. This packet...»

«Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited and The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited take no responsibility for the contents of this joint announcement, make no representation as to its accuracy or completeness and expressly disclaim any liability whatsoever for any loss howsoever arising from or in reliance upon the whole or any part of the contents of this joint announcement. This joint announcement is for information purposes only and does not constitute an invitation or offer to acquire,...»

«The Minister's Spiritual Life BY E. W. McMILLAN PUBLISHED BY FIRM FOUNDATION PUBLISHING HOUSE AUSTIN, TEXAS ORIGINAL COPYRIGHT 1959 FIRM FOUNDATION PUBLISHING HOUSE (Not renewed) TO MY FAMILY Who have inspired me so much and for so many years by their unwavering faith in the efforts which always have been so feeble in my judgment AND My personal friends throughout the world, who have inspired me for a long span of years by their repeated expressions of appreciation AND To the Gospel preachers...»

«A69/45 Page 2 CONTENTS DIRECTOR-GENERAL’s executive summary 4 Foreword 5 Overview 30 SECTION 1. ACHIEVEMENTS BY CATEGORY AND PROGRAMME AREA Category 1 Communicable diseases 31 33 1.1 HIV/AIDS 35 1.2 Tuberculosis 1.3 Malaria 38 1 1.4 Neglected tropical diseases 41 1.5 Vaccine-preventable diseases 43 Category 2 Noncommunicable diseases 47 49 2.1 Noncommunicable diseases 52 2.2 Mental health and substance abuse 2.3 Violence and injuries 54 2.4 Disabilities and rehabilitation 57 2.5 Nutrition 59...»

«Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences ISSN: 2231– 6345 (Online) An Open Access, Online International Journal Available at www.cibtech.org/sp.ed/jls/2014/04/jls.htm 2014 Vol. 4 (S4), pp. 1210-1221/Soleimani et al. Research Article MEASURING RELATIONSHIP OF PLACE BELONGING AND LIFE QUALITY (CASE STUDY: HAFT CHENAR NEIGHBORHOOD OF TEHRAN) Mansoor Soleimani1, Mahnaz Akbari2, Mansoor Azizy3 and *Amir Rahmani4 1 Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Shahid Beheshti...»





 
<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.dissertation.xlibx.info - Dissertations, online materials

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.