FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Dissertations, online materials

Pages:   || 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |   ...   | 10 |

«SUPREME COURT OF THE NEW YORK COUNTY OF ONElDA PAUL PARSHALL,on behalf of himself and those similarly situated, Plaintiff; Index No.: CA2015-577 v. ...»

-- [ Page 1 ] --



PAUL PARSHALL,on behalf of himself

and those similarly situated,

Plaintiff; Index No.: CA2015-577
















WHEREAS, this Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement ('`Stipulation") is entered into as of October 23, 2015, by and among the parties to the actions captioned Pczrshall v. Ric/acrr•cl B. Myers, et al., Index No. CA2015-577 currently pending in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Oneida ("Action 1"), Solak v. Kichc~r•d B. Myej~s, et ctl., CA2015- 684 currently pending in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Oneida("Action 2"), and Colvin v. Ric6a~arcf B. MyeYs, et «l. currently pending in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Maryland (``Action 3'', together with Action 1 and Aetion 2, the ``Actions"), to document the proposed settlement of the Actions (the "Settlement''), subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein and the approval of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Oneida (the "Court").

WHEREAS,on Febniary 24, ?015, defendant Oneida Financial Corp. ('`Oneida") announced that on February 24, 2U I5, a definitive Agreement and Plan of Merger ("Merger A~reemenr'} was unanimously approved by the respective boards ofdirectors of'Community Bank System, Inc.("Comnulnity Bank System")and Oneida. Under the terms ofthe Mereer A~~reement, 60% of Oneida's common stock will be converted into Community Bank System common stock and remaining 40% will be exchanged for cash. Oneida's stockholders will have the option to elect to receive in exchange for each share of Oneida's common stock, either (i) 0.5635 shares of Community Bank System's common stock,(ii) $20.00 in cash for each Oneida common share, or (iii) a combination of Community Sank System common stock and cash (60%stock,40% cash), subject to proration to enstiire that, in the aggregate, 60% of Oneida's common stock is converted into Community Bank System common stock and 40% is converted into the right to receive cash (the "Proposed Transaction" or the ``Merger").

WHEREAS,on March 4,?015 Plaintiff Parshall filed a shareholder action alleging, pursuant to the Merger Agreement, that the directors of Oneida breached their fiduciary duties to Oneida's stockholders by failing to take adequate steps to ensure that the Oneida's stockholders receive adequate, fair and maximum consideration under the circumstances and by engineering the Merger to the benefit of themselves and/or Comm►,inity Bank System without regard to Oneida"s stockholders and Community Bank System aided and abetted the alleged breaches of fiduciary duty by Oneida's directors.

WHEREAS,on March 13, 2015, plaintiff Solak filed a second shareholder action alleging, pursuant to the Merger Agreement, that the directors of Oneida breeched their- fiduciary duties to Oneida's stockholders by failin~ to take adequate steps to ensure that the Oneida's stockholders receive adec1uate, fair and maximum consideration under the circumstances, by en~ine~ring the Merger to the benefit of themselves and/or Community Bank System without rebard to Oneida's stockholders and Community Bank System aided and abetted the alleged breaches of fiduciary duty by Oneida"s directors.

–  –  –

States Securities and Exchange Commission a Registration Statement on Form S-4 (the "Registration Statement");

WHEREAS, on April 9, 2015, Plaintiff Parshall and F'l~intiff Sol~k each filed an Amended Complaint all~~ring breaches of fiduciary duty for failing (a) to maximize shareholder value, and (b) to disclose all material infornlation to Oneida's stockholders related to the process undertaken by the Oneida board of directors to sell the company and the financial analysis and fairness opinion provide by Oneida's financial advisor, Keefe, Bruyette &Woods, Inc.('`KBW").

WHEREAS,on April 10, ?015, Plaintiffs Solak and Parsh~ll moved to consolidate the related shareholder actions and to have Brodsky &Smith, LLC("Brodsky &Smith")and Ryan & Maniskas, LLP ("Ryan & Maniskas") appointed as Co-Lead Counsel.

WHEREAS,on or about Apri124, 2015, Plaintiff Colvin filed a shareholder action alleging, pursuant to the Merger Agreement, that the directors of Oneida breached their fiduciai-y duties to Oneida's stockholders by failing to take adequate steps to ensure that Oneida's stockholders receive adequate, fair and maximum consideration under the circumstances, by engineering the Merger' to the benefit of themselves and/or Community Bank System without

–  –  –

breaches of fiduciary duty by Oneida's directors.

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Colvin and Defendants agreed to stay Action 3 pendin~~ a resolution of Action 1 and Action ?.

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Solak and Parshall prepaz~ed a motion for expedited discovet-y end proceedings, but ultimately dici not file it as the parties' good faith negotiations ultimately led to a stipulated expedited briefing and hearing schedule, and an exchange of discovery on an expedited basis, which was approved by the court.

WHEREAS, counsel for Plaintiffs Solak and Parshall conducted discovery on an expedited basis by, amonb other things, deposing three witnesses:(i) defendant Michael R. Kallet, Cl~ainnan of the Board of~ Directors and Chief Executive Officer of Oneida;(ii) defendant Rodney D. Kent, an independent director of Oneida and member of the Mer~~er Committee f~nned to evaluate the Proposed Transaction; and (iii) Robin Suskind, a representative of KBW, Oneida's financial advisor for the Proposed Transaction. Counsel for Plaintiffs Solak and Parshall also reviewed over 13,000 pages of non-public documents, including minutes of Board meetings, presentations by KBW and forecast material provided by Oneida, among other documents.

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Solak and P~rshall filed their motion for preliminary injunction on May 26, ?015, and Defendants filed their opposition to the motion for- preliminary injunction nn June 4, 2015.

WHEREAS, counsel for the Plaintiffs and counsel for Defendants engaged in arm's-length nebotiations regarding a potential settlement of the Actions beginning nn June 5, ?015.

WHEREAS,on June 9,?015, counsel reached an agreement in principle, set forth

–  –  –

among the Plaintiff in each action, on behalf of himself or herself and the Settlement Class (as defined below) of persons nn behalf of whom each Plaintiff has brou~~ht the Actions, and Defendants, on the terms end subject to the conditions set forth below.

–  –  –

filing with the SEC on Form 8-K.

WHEREAS, Defendants acknowledge that these Supplemental Disclosures were the result of the efforts of Plaintiffs' counsel and the complaints made by Plaintiffs.

–  –  –

Company was held at which the Oneida shareholders, among other things, voted on a proposal to adopt the Merger Agreement, with the majority voting in favor of the Proposed Transaction.

WHEREAS, the Proposed Transaction has not yet closed and is awaiting certain required regulatory approvals.

–  –  –

class action pursuant to New York Civil Practice Law and Rules ("CPLR") §~ 901 and 902 for Settlement purposes oi11y, as set forth in ~~~; 3-4 below;

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs' Counsel have conducted an investigation and pursued discovery relating to the claims and the underlying events and transactions alleged in the Actions, have analyzed the evidence adduced during their investibation and discovery, and have researched the applicable law with respect to the claims of Plaintiffs and the Class against the Defendants and the potential defenses thereto;

WHEREAS, based upon their investigation, discovery and analysis, Plaintiffs and Plaintiffs' Col~nsel have concluded that the terms and conditions of this Stipulation are fair, reasonable, adequate, and in the best interests of Plaintiffs and the putative Settlement Class, and have agreed to settle the claims raised, or that could have been raised, in the Actions pursuant to the teens and conditions of this Stipulation, after considering: (i) the benefits that Plaintiffs and the other members o~f the Class will receive from the Settlement; (ii) the attendant risks of litigation; (iii) the dine and expense that would be incurred by further litigation; and (iv) the desirability of permitting the Settlement to be consummated as provided by the terms of this Stipulation;

–  –  –

lack of any merit of any of the claims asserted in the Actions;

WHEREAS, Defendants have vigorously denied, and continue to deny vigorously all allegations of wrongdoing, fault, liability or damage to any of the respective Plaintiffs or the Settlement Class (defined below and the certification of which is only considered in connection with the contemplated Settlement); deny that they engaged in any improper behavior, wrongdoing, or committed any violation of law; deny that any disclosures in connection with the Proposed Transaction (including in the Definitive Proxy) are in any way deficient; believe t11at they acted properly at all times; believe that the Actions his no merit (both with respect to the requested injunctive relief and to damages); and maintain that they have committed no disclosure violations or any other breach of duty whatsoever in connection with the Proposed Transaction

–  –  –

of fiirther litigation, and without admittinb the validity of any allegations oracle in the Actions, or any liability with respect thereto (and such allegations being specifically denied), have concluded that it is desirable that the claims against them be settled and dismissed on the teams reflected in this StipL~lation; and WHEREAS, the Plaintiffs and Defendants (collectively, the "Parties'") recognize the time and expense that would he incurred by further liti~~ation and the uncertainties inherent in such litigation;

–  –  –

consideration of the benefits afforded herein, that the Actions shall be compromised, settled, released anti dismissed with prejudice, upon and subject to the following tet~ns and conditions, and further s~ibject to the approval of the Court and pursuant to CPLR ~ 901, ~ 902,

and ~ 908:

–  –  –

Claims (as defined below) against the Released Parties (defined below) end the dismissal with prejudice of the Actions, the Defendants made the Supplemental Disclosures to the Definitive Proxy as set forth on a Form 8-K filed by Oneida with the SEC on June 10, ?015 and attached hereto as Exhibit A. Asset forth in the Fonn 8-K, the Supplemental Disclosures contain additional infornlation including, but not limited to, the following: (a) the reasons for the Board's vote in favor of the Merger A;reement; (U) information used by KBW concerning whether other companies expz-essed interest in a potential transaction with Oneida in the months leading up to the Proposed Transaction; (c) selected financial inforniation concerning Oneida"s "size peer'"

–  –  –

coneerninb the information used by KBW to calculate the discounted cash flow for Oneida; (e) selected financial information used by KBW concerning Community Bank System's ``peer' group used by KBW in the Seleetecl Companies Aricrlvsis Corrifnunzty Bcinlc; aild (f) additional Oneida financial projections for the years 2015 through 2U 19.

2. Without admitting any wrongdoinb, Defendants acknowled;e that the filing and prosecution of the Actions and discussions with Plaintiffs' Counsel in the Actions were the sole cause for the Supplemental Disclosures. Plaintiffs' Counsel have proposed, reviewed, commented nn and approved the Supplemental Disclosures.

–  –  –

3. For Settlement purposes only, the Parties agree that the Aetions shall be consolidated and conditionally cer-~ified as a class action pursuant to CPLR ~~ 901 and 902 on behalf of a settlement class (the "Settlement Class") consisting of all record and beneficial owners of Oneida common stock durin~~ the period beginning oil February ?4, 2015 through and including June 17, ?015 (the "Settlement Class Period"). Members of the Settlement Class are referred to as "Settlement Class Members''. Excluded from the Settlement Class are Defendants, the officers, directors, affiliates, anti family members of any of the Defendants, and any entity in which any Defendant has or had a controlling interest, and their respective successors-ininterest, s«ccessors, predecessors-in-interest, predecessors, representatives, ti~lstees, executors, administrators, estates, heirs, assibns, or transferees, iinmedi~te and remote, anci any person or entity acting fc~r or on behalf of, or claiming under, any of them, and each of them, only in their capacity as such. The Settlement Class shall be a mandatory non-opt out Class with respect to all claims for injunctive, declaratory and other ec~uit~ble relief.

4. The Settlement Class will be preliminarily certified, only in connection with this Stipulation, upon t11e Court's entry of the Order prelimin~Y-ily ~pprovinb Settlement and providing for notice (the ``Preliminary Approval Order"), substantially in the form attached hereto ~s Exhibit B. The certification of the Class shall be binding only with respect to this Stipulation. In the event that this Stipulation is terminated pursuant to its terms, the certification of the Class shall be deemed vacated, the Actions shall proceed as though the Class had never been certified, and no reference to the certification of the Class shall be made by the Parties for any p~~rpose, except as expressly authorized by the terms of this Sti~uiation. If the Stipulation is terminated, Defendants reserve the right to oppose certification of ally cl~iss in future proceedings.

–  –  –

Pages:   || 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |   ...   | 10 |

Similar works:

«References Albarracin-Jordan, Juan V.1992. Prehispanic and early Colonial settlement patterns in the Lower Tiwanaku Valley, Bolivia. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Southern Methodist University. Ann Arbor: University Microfilms.1996. Tiwanku: Arqueologia regional y dinamica segmentaria. La Paz: Plural editores.. Albarracin-Jordan, Juan V., and James Edward Mathews 1990. Asentamientos prehispanicos del valle de Tiwanaku Vol. 1. La Paz: Producciones Cima. Alconini...»

«127 Handbook of Satisfiability Armin Biere, Marijn Heule, Hans van Maaren and Toby Walsch IOS Press, 2008 c 2008 Joao Marques-Silva, Ines Lynce and Sharad Malik. All rights reserved. Chapter 4 Conflict-Driven Clause Learning SAT Solvers Joao Marques-Silva, Ines Lynce and Sharad Malik 4.1. Introduction One of the main reasons for the widespread use of SAT in many applications is that Conflict-Driven Clause Learning (CDCL) Boolean Satisfiability (SAT) solvers are so effective in practice....»

«        SUMMER 2015 GRANT CYCLE    Thank you for your help in making the grant decisions for this round of The Conservation Alliance  funding.      Following are the summaries and project budgets for each proposal on the Summer 2015 Ballot.    Please complete your online ballot by Wednesday, September 9, 2015.  If you have any questions,  please don’t hesitate to contact John, Serena or Josie at 541‐389‐2424.    ...»

«Campfire Stories Telling stories around a campfire, particularly funny ones, is a time honored tradition of scouting. Mark Twain once said that There are several kinds of stories, but only one difficult kind – the humorous. It isn't easy to tell a funny story. In fact, sometimes it's nearly impossible to get people to laugh. But with a little imagination and a lot of practice, you'll have them clutching their sides while sitting around the campfire.Techniques: 1. Find a story to tell. Whether...»

«                  Lincoln University Digital Dissertation      Copyright Statement  The digital copy of this dissertation is protected by the Copyright Act 1994 (New  Zealand).  This dissertation may be consulted by you, provided you comply with the provisions of  the Act and the following conditions of use:  you will use the copy only for the purposes of research or private study   ...»

«Defining the Role of Secondary DNA Structures and Transcription Factors on the Transcriptional Control of the HIF1alpha and VEGF Promoters Item type Electronic Dissertation; text Authors Uribe, Diana Judith Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items...»

«Moral Panics and the Strengthening of Hegemony : The Deficit and Debt 'Crisis' in Canada Jennifer Jane Hoffman Depariment of Sociology Submitted in partial fuifiilment of the requirernents for the degree of Master of arts Faculty of Graduate Studies The University of Western Ontario London, Ontario October, 1998 O Jennifer Jane Hoffman 1998 Bibliothèque nationale 1+1 National Library du Canada n&,a Acquisitions et Acquisitions and Bibliographie Services services bibliographiques 395. rue...»

«Copyright © 2002 The Center for Christian Ethics at Baylor University 24 Unquenchable Fire BY E. ANNI JUDKINS Though the Bible is far from expansive on the subject of hell, it can guide us in answering some of our most insistent questions. But we are required to be careful and faithful readers to determine what Scripture really does say, instead of what we think it should say. W e are uncomfortable talking about hell. When we talk with Christians, it may be tolerable because we believe we are...»

«I BELIEVE THE FUTURE OF BRANDS MUST BE SUPERHUMAN, TO COMPETE AGAINST EVERYTHING AND EVERYONE IN THIS MARKETING AGE, TRULY DELIVERING THE EXTRAORDINARY. Figure 1 by Emily Fairhead-Keen 6 The Age of Marketing ‘Men want say rain. They begin by performing a rain dance, which often does not work. This is the Age of Magic. Then, baulked of success, they do the next best thing and fall to their knees and pray. This is the Age of Religion. When prayers do not work, they set about investigating the...»

«RAPPORT HANDREIKING JEUGDWET GEMEENTEN DONGEN, GOIRLE & LOON OP ZAND Eindrapport Mei 2015 2 INHOUDSOPGAVE BESTUURLIJKE NOTA 5 1. Inleiding 7 2. Analyse 8 3. Conclusies 9 4. Aanbevelingen 11 BESTUURLIJKE REACTIE COLLEGES VAN B&W 13 NAWOORD REKENKAMERCOMMISSIE 23 NOTA VAN BEVINDINGEN 25 1. Inleiding 27 2. De Jeugdwet 29 3. Regionaal en lokaal jeugdbeleid 33 3.1 Regionaal beleid 33 3.2 Lokaal beleid 35 4. Sturingsmogelijkheden 43 4.1 Sturingsmogelijkheden algemeen 43 4.2 Sturingsmogelijkheden...»

«IMPROVING THE EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF RAILCAR SAFETY APPLIANCE INSPECTIONS USING MACHINE VISION TECHNOLOGY BY JOHN RILEY EDWARDS B.E., Vanderbilt University, 2004 THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Civil Engineering in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2006 Urbana, Illinois ii ABSTRACT IMPROVING THE EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF RAILCAR SAFETY APPLIANCE INSPECTIONS USING MACHINE...»

«United Nations Development Programme Human Development Report Office OCCASIONAL PAPER Background paper for HDR 2004 African Wars and Ethnic Conflicts – Rebuilding Failed States Kwesi Kwaa Prah 2004/10 African Wars and Ethnic Conflicts – Rebuilding Failed States Kwesi Kwaa Prah The Centre for Advanced Studies of African Society Cape Town Africa Regional Background Paper: Human Development Report 2004. UNDP. Introduction There has been a popular misconception that Africa’s numerous wars and...»

<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.dissertation.xlibx.info - Dissertations, online materials

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.