WWW.DISSERTATION.XLIBX.INFO
FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Dissertations, online materials
 
<< HOME
CONTACTS



Pages:   || 2 |

«E. RIEGER, W. Q. GAN∗ and H. MARSCHHÄUSER Max-Planck-Institut für Extraterrestrische Physik, D-85740 Garching, Germany (Received 25 November ...»

-- [ Page 1 ] --

GAMMA-RAY LINE VERSUS CONTINUUM EMISSION OF

ELECTRON-DOMINATED EPISODES DURING SOLAR FLARES

E. RIEGER, W. Q. GAN∗ and H. MARSCHHÄUSER

Max-Planck-Institut für Extraterrestrische Physik, D-85740 Garching, Germany

(Received 25 November 1997; accepted 26 May 1998)

Abstract. Electron-dominated episodes or events during solar flares are characterized by a flattening

of the electron bremsstrahlung continuum above about 1 MeV. This flattening leads to a dominance of the continuum at MeV energies over nuclear emissions. We analyzed events recorded by the gamma-ray spectrometer on SMM with the aim to determine the nuclear contribution in the energy range between 4 and 8 MeV. We find that for comparable continuum fluences it is less by about an order of magnitude than for other flares. The spectral index of the best-fit power law of the 1 MeV continuum with a median at −1.84 turns out to be independent of the heliocentric angle of the events, implying that the degree of anisotropy of the radiating particles was low. It is of interest to note that a value of ∼ −1.5 seems to be a limit. The spectral index of the continuum between 0.3 and 1 MeV does not differ significantly from that of other flares. Only measurements with detectors sensitive up to at least 10 MeV can, therefore, sort out electron dominated episodes during solar flares.

1. Introduction The emission during solar flares in the energy range from 0.3 to 10 MeV is a superposition of continuum and nuclear line radiation. It was estimated and shown by measurements that at energies from 0.3 to 1 MeV a continuum originating from electron bremsstrahlung and above ∼ 1 MeV nuclear line radiation dominates the flare spectrum (Ibragimov and Kocharov, 1977; Ramaty, Kozlovsky, and Suri, 1977; Forrest, 1983; Chupp, 1984). This important fact facilitates the separation of the ionic from the electronic component. It is customary to approximate the continuum by a best-fit power law and to extrapolate it to higher energies. The excess above this extrapolation, which is intense especially between 4 and 7 MeV, is then ascribed to nuclear interactions. From the separated fluences, the number and spectra of the respective constituents can be calculated (Ramaty and Murphy, 1984; Ramaty et al., 1993).

There are, however, energetic episodes during solar flares recorded by the Gamma-Ray Spectrometer (GRS) on SMM whose spectra differ substantially from the conventional picture. The spectra are basically continua in the whole energy range from 0.3 to 10 MeV and beyond, with a tendency to flatten around 1 MeV, and the contribution of nuclear lines above 1 MeV is small (Rieger and Marschhäuser, 1990). They also do not exhibit a marked drop above 7.2 MeV, which ∗ Humboldt Research Fellow, on leave from Purple Mountain Observatory, Nanjing, China.

Solar Physics 183: 123–132, 1998.

© 1998 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands.

124 E. RIEGER, W. Q. GAN, AND H. MARSCHHÄUSER is obvious in nuclear line events, resulting from the absence of intense nuclear lines above this energy (Rieger, 1991; Share and Murphy, 1995). It is generally accepted that this high-energy continuum also originates from electrons (Hudson and Ryan, 1995). This type of flare or burst is, therefore, called ‘electron dominated’ or ‘electron rich’, to distinguish it from other (normal) flares (Rieger and Marschhäuser, 1990; Hudson and Ryan, 1995). These events have been observed from other detectors in space, too, for instance by PHEBUS on GRANAT (Pelaez et al., 1992; Vilmer, 1994; Vilmer and Trottet, 1997), by GAMMA-1 (Akimov et al., 1994), by BATSE, COMPTEL and EGRET on CGRO (Ramaty et al., 1994;

Ryan et al., 1993; Dingus et al., 1994, respectively), by the WBS on Yohkoh (Yoshimori et al., 1993) and possibly also by Hinotori (Yoshimori, Okudaira, and Yanagimachi, 1986).

In this paper we investigate the contribution of the nucleonic emissions to the fluence above 1 MeV of GRS electron-dominated events and compare it with other flares, and inspect the dependence of the spectral index of the high-energy continuum on the heliocentric angle. Finally, we check whether the spectral slope below 1 MeV discriminates between electron-dominated events and other solar flares.

2. Observations

In Table I the GRS electron-dominated episodes or events during flares are listed, which were intense enough to be spectrally analyzed in the nuclear energy range above 1 MeV. All these events show a prominent signal above 10 MeV. This was the prime condition for their selection from the main flare list. The second condition was that the continuum, not lines, is the dominant contribution within the nuclear energy range. A clear hint for this is the fluence contained in the energy interval from 7.2 to 9 MeV (GRS upper photon energy limit), which is much higher than the 0.3–1 MeV power-law extrapolation for these events. However, a 10 MeV emission can also originate from pion decay (see Murphy, Dermer, and Ramaty, 1987). It is of importance to note that only for two flares in which the electrondominated events occurred was pion decay radiation recorded: (1) event No. 4 is a precursor of the energetic 3 June 1982 flare (Forrest et al., 1985; Rieger, 1994);





(2) during event No. 9 pion decay radiation was observed (Dunphy and Chupp, 1991), but the contribution to the emission below 10 MeV is negligible. As already mentioned, the most probable source of the 1 MeV continuum of all the listed events is, therefore, electron bremsstrahlung.

The temporal histories of the events, except No. 1, are already published as indicated in column 6 of Table I by superscripts. t in column 6 is the time interval over which the flare or event is spectrally analyzed and f in column 7 is the fractional time interval of the gamma-ray flare over which it was electron dominated. As the temporal resolution of the GRS is 16.384 s, t, in most cases, is a multiple of this value. For events No. 8, 10 and 12, however, a short burst

GAMMA-RAY LINE VERSUS CONTINUUM EMISSION DURING SOLAR FLARES

–  –  –

dominated the emission during the 16 s time window, as evidenced from the high time resolution (2.048 s) of the ‘main channel window’ between 4.1 MeV and

6.4 MeV, and from the high-energy channels above 10 MeV (Forrest et al., 1980).

For these events we assume that the spectral slope does not change within the 16 s time window, and the spectral constant is calculated according to the fluence of the burst, with respect to the whole 16 s time interval.

The spectra were deconvolved by applying the Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) method (Marschhäuser, 1993). As already mentioned, the spectra of the electron dominated events flatten above about 1 MeV. The continuum is approximated by a broken power law of the form A1,2 E γ 1,2, where A1,2 is essentially the differential intensity at 1 MeV and the subscripts refer to the power law below and above 1 MeV, respectively. As usual, the excess between 4 and 8 MeV above the power law – here the power law above 1 MeV – is ascribed to nucleonic interactions. For ‘normal’ flares the power law above 1 MeV is an extrapolation from lower energies. For electron-dominated events the power law above 1 MeV is an observable quantity. In Table II the spectral parameters of the events of Table I are listed.

126 E. RIEGER, W. Q. GAN, AND H. MARSCHHÄUSER

–  –  –

Column 6 contains the nuclear excess fluence between 4 and 8 MeV deduced for the time interval, listed in Table I (column 6). A valuable proxy for nucleonic interactions is also the fluence of the neutron capture line at 2.223 MeV. Where possible (events No. 1, 7 and 12) this value has also been determined. It is listed below Table II, corrected for off-disc-centre position (Hua and Lingenfelter, 1987).

For the other events, the 2.223 MeV line fluence could not be determined because they were too close to the solar limb, they occurred shortly before Earth occultation of SMM, or they were in close temporal proximity to other flare bursts.

In Figure 1 the 4–8 MeV nuclear excess fluence of the electron-dominated events versus the 0.3 MeV continuum fluence is inserted into a graph compiled by Vestrand (1988), who analyzed the GRS flares up to February 1986. Events No. 1–6 are, therefore, contained in Vestrand’s graph, but, contrary to our procedure, where the nuclear excess fluence is determined by subtracting the 1 MeV continuum, the extrapolated 0.3 MeV power-law continuum was subtracted.

Moreover, only for events No. 1 and 2 was the same time interval used. The large erGAMMA-RAY LINE VERSUS CONTINUUM EMISSION DURING SOLAR FLARES 3.0

–  –  –

1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0

-0.5

–  –  –

ror bars are mainly caused by the uncertainty in defining the slope of the 1 MeV power law. Event No. 9 marks a transition between an electron-dominated episode and a normal flare. It is apparent that for most of the electron-dominated events a nuclear excess can be reliably determined, but it is lower by almost an order of magnitude than for other flares. There is an indication that at low continuum fluences both types of events begin to merge.

In Figure 2 the nuclear excess fluence is plotted versus the 1 MeV continuum fluence. This kind of representation is more appropriate to our situation, because electron-dominated episodes are characterized by the dominance of the continuum above 1 MeV. We left out those flares from Vestrand’s sample which have a convex (as seen from above) shape of the continuum from 0.3 to 1 MeV, because the 1 MeV extrapolation then becomes erroneous. As one would expect, the gap 128 E. RIEGER, W. Q. GAN, AND H. MARSCHHÄUSER

–  –  –

Fluence ( 1 MeV ) [ γ / cm2 ]

Figure 2. Correlation plot for 4 – 8 MeV excess versus the continuum fluence above 1 MeV. Full dots:

1 MeV continuum fluence calculated according to Vestrand et al. (1987, Table I). Open triangles:

electron-dominated events. Asterisks : 4–8 MeV fluence inferred from 2.2 MeV line fluence by equating both values (Ramaty et al., 1993).

between both types of events increases and the tendency to merge at low continuum fluences is fading.

–  –  –

Because the continuum above 1 MeV of the non-electron-dominated events or flares is not really observed, we have to ask how Figure 2 changes in case the slope should differ from the extrapolated value. If it steepens above 1 MeV, the full dots would be shifted to the upper left and the separation between both types of events gets larger. If it flattens, the separation gets smaller. The latter case is unlikely, because then we would observe excess emission between 7.2 and 9 MeV and above 10 MeV, and these events or flares would be assigned to the type ‘electrondominated’.

GAMMA-RAY LINE VERSUS CONTINUUM EMISSION DURING SOLAR FLARES

An important point is the directionality of the high-energy photons. This topic was revitalized by the observation that flares with photon emission above 10 MeV are located preferably near the solar limb (Rieger et al., 1983; Vestrand et al., 1987; Vestrand, Forrest, and Rieger, 1991; Talon et al., 1993), suggesting that the distribution of the radiating particles is anisotropic. Calculations by Dermer and Ramaty (1986) showed that for electrons having a horizontal distribution, the bremsstrahlung continuum is enhanced with respect to an isotropic distribution for flares which are close to the solar limb. This enhancement depends upon the degree of anisotropy and of the energy of the radiating electrons. The heliocentric angle of our events (column 4 of Table I) is between 44◦ and 90◦. We, therefore, should expect that the continuum above 1 MeV of the electron-dominated events is overestimated compared to the sample of Vestrand. This fact would reduce the gap between electron-dominated events and other flares in Figure 2. The directionality of the electrons, however, should also influence the spectral index of the 1 MeV continuum in the sense that it decreases (in absolute magnitude) with heliocentric angle (see Vestrand et al., 1987). Contrary to this expectation, we see in Figure 3 that it is independent of the position at the Sun. There is also no heliocentric angle dependence when one takes the difference between the low-energy and the high-energy spectral indices. This surprising finding implies that the degree of anisotropy of the radiating electrons is probably low and, therefore, the correction to be applied to the continuum flux of the electron dominated events in Figure 2 is negligible. (For further discussion see Mandzhavidze and Ramaty, 1993.) The gap, which separates both types of events in Figure 2, is tempting to conclude that electron-dominated episodes or events during solar flares constitute a special phenomenon of the active Sun. A less spectacular assumption, however, is that the gap results from the small number of these events in our flare sample and that further measurements with larger and better detectors would lead to a filling-in (event No. 9). In this case, electron dominated episodes during flares are events with extreme spectral properties (Trottet et al., 1998). We conjecture that the small number of nuclear lines is caused by the preponderance of an acceleration mechanism that does not preferably accelerate protons or ions with respect to electrons. If electrons and protons are accelerated to high energies with about the same efficiency, gamma-ray lines begin to disappear in the strong electron continuum. A mechanism with these characteristics is acceleration by DC electric fields (Haerendel, 1994), which is known and very well observed in the Earth’s magnetosphere (Haerendel et al., 1976; Haerendel, 1987). For alternative explanations of the spectral properties of electron-dominated events see Bech, Steinacker, and Schlickeiser (1990), Petrosian, McTiernan, and Marschhäuser (1994) and Park, Petrosian, and Schwartz (1997).

It is also of interest to note that the power law spectral index of the continuum above 1 MeV has an apparent limit around −1.5. If this limit should be conrmed by future measurements, it could be of importance to sort out the prevalent acceleration mechanism.



Pages:   || 2 |


Similar works:

«Is Time on Iranian Women Protesters’ Side? Ziba Mir-Hosseini June 16, 2006 (Ziba Mir-Hosseini is senior research associate at the London Middle East Institute, SOAS, and will be global visiting professor of law at New York University in the fall of 2006.) In early June, Zanestan an Iran-based online journal announced a rally in Haft Tir Square, one of Tehran’s busiest, to protest legal discrimination suffered by Iranian women. The demonstration was also called to commemorate two landmark...»

«SHAREHOLDER ACTIVISM AND SHORT-TERMISM Fostering Long-Term Engagement in the European Union Inês Magalhães Correia LLM, Catolica Global School of Law Working Paper No.04/2014 November 2014 _This paper can be downloaded without charge from the Governance Lab website at: www.governancelab.org. The contents of this paper are the sole responsibility of its author. Keywords: Shareholder Activism, Short-Termism, Financial Crisis, Corporate Governance, European Corporate Governance. SHAREHOLDER...»

«REVUE INTERNATIONALE DE DROIT PÉNAL INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF PENAL LAW REVISTA INTERNACIONAL DE DERECHO PENAL La Revue Internationale de Droit Pénal (www.penal.org rubrique « Publications ») est indexée par l’International Bibliography of the Social Sciences Les contenus de la RIDP sont aussi accessibles, en particulier, pour les nonmembres de l’AIDP, sur le site www.cairn.info/revue-internationale-de-droitpenal.htm The International Review of Penal Law (www.penal.org heading...»

«UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD 2014 MSPB 53 Docket No. AT-0752-13-0258-I-1 Leslie A. Gallegos, Appellant, v. Department of the Air Force, Agency. July 17, 2014 Lawrence A. Berger, Esquire, Glen Cove, New York, for the appellant. Major Kristina D. Penta, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas, for the agency. Susan Knutson, Quantico, Virginia, for the agency. BEFORE Susan Tsui Grundmann, Chairman Anne M. Wagner, Vice Chairman Mark A. Robbins, Member OPINION AND ORDER 1 The...»

«Contents Page 1. Law 7: Control of Boards and Cards 2. Law 18: Bids 3. Law 16: Unauthorised Information (Hesitation) 4. Law 25: Legal and Illegal Changes of Call 4. Law 40: Partnership understandings 5. Law 41: Face-down Opening Lead 5. Law 68: Claim or Concession of Tricks 6. Law 70: Contested Claim or Concession 6. Law 74: Proper attitude 7. Law 45: C Compulsory Play of Card 8. Revoke Law 78 Scoring “PASSED IN” i.e. “NO BID” hands 9. 10. Alerting from The Laws of Duplicate Contract...»

«Thoughts From The Mount Of Blessings BY ELLEN G. WHITE www.maranathamedia.com.au The Sermon on the Mount is Heaven’s benediction to the world a voice from the throne of God. It was given to mankind to be to them the law of duty and the light of heaven, their hope and consolation in despondency, their joy and comfort in all the vicissitudes and walks of life. Here the Prince of preachers, the Master Teacher, utters the words that the Father gave Him to speak. The Beatitudes are Christ’s...»

«This TEXTUAL PROPOSAL is the European Union's initial proposal for legal text on Dispute Settlement (Government to Government) in TTIP. It was tabled for discussion with the US in the negotiating round of 10-14 March 2014 and made public on 7 January 2015. The actual text in the final agreement will be a result of negotiations between the EU and US. TEXTUAL PROPOSAL DISPUTE SETTLEMENT General Notes: 1. Articles are numbered from 1 for ease of reading, especially when an Article cross-refers to...»

«8. Contributory Negligence, Assumption of Risk and Duties of Protection Terms of Reference 1. Inquire into the application, effectiveness and operation of common law principles applied in negligence to limit liability arising from personal injury and death, including: (e) contributory negligence; and (f) allowing individuals to assume risk.3. In conducting this inquiry, the Panel must: (b) develop and evaluate proposals to allow self assumption of risk to override common law principles; (c)...»

«RADIO SPIES — EPISODES IN THE ETHER WARS BARTHOLOMEW LEE KV6LEE – WPE2DLT Attorney at Law (California) and Late Adjunct Professor, Golden Gate University 388 Market Street, ste 900 San Francisco, CA 94111 Phone 415 956 5959 email: KV6LEE@gmail.com A version of this note appeared in 15 ANTIQUE WIRELESS ASSOCIATION REVIEW Correspondence is invited. INTRODUCTION: TELLING THE STORY OF RADIO INTERCEPTION FOR INTELLIGENCE PURPOSES. Radio’s virtue as a broadcasting medium, that many may listen,...»

«REPORT OF INVESTIGATION BY THE SPECIAL COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF HOLLINGER INTERNATIONAL INC. Gordon A. Paris, Chairman Graham W. Savage Raymond G.H. Seitz Counsel and Advisors Richard C. Breeden & Co. The Law Offices of Richard C. Breeden Counsel O’Melveny & Myers LLP August 30, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 A. A CORPORATE KLEPTOCRACY 4 B. EVALUATING THE BOARD’S CONDUCT 31 II. GLOSSARY 48 III. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS 60 IV. ACTIONS BY THE...»

«Berkeley Law Berkeley Law Scholarship Repository The Circuit California Law Review 2-2012 Teaching Humanities Softly: Bringing a Critical Approach to the First-Year Contracts Class Through Trial and Error Ariela J. Gross Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/clrcircuit Recommended Citation Gross, Ariela J., Teaching Humanities Softly: Bringing a Critical Approach to the First-Year Contracts Class Through Trial and Error (2012). The Circuit. Paper 34....»

«INTERNATIONAL CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA: PROBLEMS IN BILLS OF LADING AND THEIR IMPACT IN AUSTRALIA AND ITS MAJOR TRADING PARTNERS IN ASIA by Krailerk Euarjai LL.B. (Thammasat University) Secretary of the Petition Committee Office of the Council of State, Thailand Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Laws University of Tasmania May 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page i Declaration ii Abstract iii Acknowledgments Select Table of Abbreviations iv INTRODUCTION CHAPTER I...»





 
<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.dissertation.xlibx.info - Dissertations, online materials

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.