FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Dissertations, online materials

Pages:   || 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |

«A novelists, kings DVENTURERS, ARTISTS, CERTAIN INTELLECTUALS, and queens, as well as politicians and revolutionaries of all kinds seem to be natural ...»

-- [ Page 1 ] --

Historicizing the Historian:

Writing the life of

Raymond Carr*

María Jesús González

A novelists, kings


and queens, as well as politicians and revolutionaries of all

kinds seem to be natural subjects for biography. When I decided to

write the biography of the historian Sir Raymond Carr (b. 1919), I

thought, quite naively, that it was a slightly eccentric thing to do. 1 I soon realized that I had entered a walled garden in which there grew a number of similar plants that fed on memory: historians’ autobiographies, égo-histoires, interviews, 2 the customary potted biography one finds in Festschriften,3 as well as biographies of historians written by other historians. There has been a steadily increasing output of the latter since 2000. In 2010, the year the Spanish edition of my biography of Carr was published, five other historians were the subjects of monograph-length biographies in the English language alone.4 Not all historians are comfortable with the genre, and one of the doubters was E.H. Carr (no relative of Raymond). Despite his dictum “before the history study the historian” and despite being a biographer himself, E.H. Carr (1892-1982) was ambivalent towards biography, and wondered “whether good biography made bad history.” Unsurprisingly, he has also been the subject of a biography.5 María Jesús González, “Historicizing the Historian: Writing the life of Raymond Carr,” Journal of Historical Biography 16 (Autumn 2014): 33www.ufv.ca/jhb. © Journal of Historical Biography 2014. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons 3.0 License.


The trend towards auto/biographical analyses of historians by historians seems here to stay. It is fuelled in part by the more recent practice of self-exposure or “self-revelation,” in contrast with the previous tradition of “self-effacement.”6 But it has come to the fore in recent years, above all among historians of the contemporary world. The intellectual autobiography of the Marxist Eric Hobsbawm (1917-2012) has somehow encouraged other members of the profession to follow his example, even when, as apostles of structuralism, they were previously hostile to such biographical or autobiographical approaches.7 The autobiographies of Michael Howard (b. 1922), Asa Briggs (b. 1921), Tony Judt (1948-2010) and J.H. Elliott (b. 1930) are, from their differing perspectives (personal, intellectual, political), other recent examples. 8 Students of the past are becoming increasingly visible as protagonists in their own right. Some historians use autobiographical narratives “to contextualize, explain and define not only their field of expertise, but also the process of historical inscription.” 9 But apart from the simple exercise of historiographical reflection, it would seem that we are witnessing a breakdown in the anonymous, scientific objectivity that historians once affected. In its place, we now have not only a quest for the “unseen hand behind the work,” but also a sort of celebration and, somehow, historicization or selfhistoricization of the historian as “memory person,” either as an active protagonist or simply as a window on the historical landscape. 10 His or her presence as expert-narrator-protagonist of a time is, it would seem, more appealing to the general public than is “dry-asdust” history.

This new fashion is particularly evident when it comes to England, the paradise of biography and narrative history, where some charismatic historians and so-called “telly-dons” have even become media stars. But it clearly goes further and has now become an international historiographical trend, one that has to do with many factors, such as the post-modern emphasis on individuality and subjectivity, the return of narrative, the re-evaluation of the historical profession, and, of course, the revival of biography as performed and written by


some of its most “respectable” professionals. 11 However, the new historiographical landscape that is emerging keeps old inequalities and disproportions alive. As it happens, this new tendency has been born with a touch of “original sin”: the number of women historians among the selected subjects is very low. Indirectly women biographers, like myself, are contributing to this state of affairs by choosing male subjects—although some of us are sensitive to and concerned about the matter and openly discuss it. The reasons for our choices are various (among them filial, intellectual affinity or random, as in my case) but in part they reflect the demographic and power imbalance within the discipline that was so marked for so long, and to some degree still persists. So if a biographer selects a subject who exerted a strong historiographical influence, the statistical chances are that this person will be male. The fact remains, however, that three-quarters of biographies of historians written by women concern male subjects, and the trend is accelerating rather than decreasing.

But I wonder if the alternative, a conscious and militant writing of the biographies of women historians by women, would be another type of “historiographical ghettoization.”12 There is also a profusion of recent literature (some of it unashamedly theoretical) that focuses on auto/biographies. A term coined some time ago—“cliography”—has recently been invoked to describe the “discrete genre” of biography of historians by historians.

So I suddenly find myself dubbed a “cliographer,” an impressivesounding title. Not only that, but I also find myself described as fitting a particular mould:

Cliographers… are nearly always formally trained historians holding academic positions and who work in the same or adjacent field as their subject.… Cliographers have nearly always written other histories first, although there are exceptions. They are generally middle-aged or beyond, apparently in keeping with the dictum that the young are insufficiently endowed with worldly experience to write about another person’s life and that biography is a poor career choice for a budding academic. 13


Choosing a subject There are, then, precedents for writing biographies of historians, and there seems to be a virtual craze for doing so. There has also been plenty of theorizing. Of all this I was blissfully unaware when I chose my subject. So the first question to be answered has to do with the choice itself: why the biography of Raymond Carr? How did the project come about?

Years ago I wrote the political biography of Antonio Maura (1853-1925), a controversial conservative politician and one of the most important Spanish statesmen of the early twentieth century.14 I spent many years immersing myself in the politics of Restoration Spain, and the Spanish political “old boys’ network.” My next project, I decided, would be one that both embraced social history and explored the world of a woman revolutionary. The figure of Sylvia Pankhurst seemed to fit the bill and I began work on her. Yet, in the end, I have written about a male historian, the prestigious and charismatic British Hispanist Raymond Carr.

“The provenance of a cliography,” it has been written, “is often a grand gesture of solidarity towards a person or a type of history.”15 But my own project was born not out of any particular attraction or “kinship” I felt with the subject—although I had a good, if brief, previous professional and personal relationship with Raymond (and his wife Sara) and held his work in the greatest regard. The trigger was in fact pure accident, the result of an unexpected request. In the spring of 2003, I was approached by the Fundación José Ortega y Gasset to write a biography of Raymond Carr. They were ready to finance the project and to publish the resulting book. Of course, in order for all this to happen, my agreement was necessary. But so, too, was Carr’s. The plan was for an authorized biography and the emphasis was to be for the most part intellectual.

The idea was an exciting one; it sounded like a true challenge.

But I was not at all sure that I wanted to do it. And Raymond Carr blew hot and cold about it all. After discussing it at some length, we resolved to meet that challenge, though it was never in any respect


going to be an easy task. For a start, the projected funding was cancelled after only a few months, though, by then, I was sufficiently involved in the project to decide to continue with it on my own initiative. As is often the case with biographies, there was already an element of obsessive commitment that remained undimmed to the end, some seven years later. Carr’s life and work had become a jigsaw puzzle that I simply had to solve. I most probably became his nightmare.

Some methodological problems: sources “The smell of burning primary sources,” suggests Midge Gillies, “lingers over the story of many literary biographies.” 16 The same was true of my biography. Raymond Carr had, some time previously (I never found out when or why), destroyed almost all his personal papers. That meant that I would have to rely on interviews and would have to learn to identify, record, and negotiate my way around deliberate silences and personal or professional secrets, the tricks played by memory,17 and the way we rework the past into something compatible with our self-image. It also meant I would have to learn how to protect myself against being lured into taking a particular line.

Yet, the extensive use of interviews meant, too, that some measure of “autobiography” would inevitably colour—in every sense—the end product. Carr’s autobiographical reminiscences were vital to the biography, but they also worked against it: “frente a ella y contra ella,” (confronting it, and against it) in Anna Caballé’s words.18 As a result, my biography sometimes weaves together my own perspective of history, or “what happens, seen from outside,” with Carr’s perception and memories, or “what happens seen from within.”19 Such interaction between biographer and subject was inevitable, and sometimes led to lively debate between us. Although I listened carefully and respectfully, I did my best to “filter” or edit his voice, imposing mine upon it in the text. I was determined not be dictated to either in the tone I wanted to establish or the conclusions I reached.


There was also the tactical problem of how best to interview an expert historian who would easily identify the purpose of one’s questions and the possible uses to which his replies might be put. It was an exercise that the old Chinese proverb would describe as “interesting.” We both also knew only too well the potential pitfalls involved in the interpretation of sources and the problems that inevitably arise when reconstructing the past. I questioned him, but he also questioned me. Often he did so in order to get a handle on my vision of his world—a world that I had to make my own, intellectually at least.

Our work began at Burch, the Carrs’ beautiful farm deep in the English countryside. I would stay with them for a few days every now and then; during those occasions I taped interviews with them both. Then I would go back to my campaign headquarters in London to continue with my reading and research. Those stays in England took place during university vacations, whenever I was not involved in teaching. I recorded a huge number of such interviews, always trying to limit the sessions to under two hours. Yet, time and again, after we had broken for lunch or tea, our conversations would wander on, as conversations do. Inevitably, they also became, for me, “research stuff.” It was an intense time. And I had, of course to learn on the job just how to be effective as an interviewer, something of which I had no previous experience.

“I am not in the least introspective,” Carr repeatedly said when talking of himself. He even confessed to me that he never thought about himself till I made him do it with my questions. So there would also be a little bit of “psychohistory” in the biography. I also had to get to know the person behind the social and academic masks and to learn to separate that person from Carr’s public persona. I do not know to what extent I have plumbed the depths of his “I,” but I think I have got quite close to his “ME,” the construction of his social self—as defined by sociologist George Herbert Mead—and that was far more important for the purposes of biography. 20 In addition to the tapes of conversations with Raymond and Sara, I conducted almost one hundred interviews in London, Oxford,


France, Portugal, and Spain with his Society friends (Society with a capital “S”) and with international academic colleagues. By and large, my informants did not know each other and often had nothing in common. That in itself was interesting. They came from two almost-incompatible worlds, both of which were familiar to Carr and in both of which he moved with ease. 21 The ages of the informants ranged from sixty-odd right up to their early nineties and so, in many cases, I dared not wait too long before interviewing them. Indeed, quite a number have sadly died in recent years.22 The majority of the interviewees were eminent academics, intellectuals, or outstanding public figures: diplomats, members of the House of Lords, and socialites. They constituted for me the most precious sources but were also often intimidating as interviewees and as potential future judges of my work: all of them were involved and had their own place and part (and their own “true” image) in the kaleidoscope of memories, which helped and encouraged me to reconstruct not only the many Carrs, but the trajectories and the spirit of a whole generation.

Pages:   || 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |

Similar works:

«Strategies to overcome institutional barriers to the transition from conventional to sustainable agriculture in Canada: the role of government, research institutions and agribusiness by Roderick John MacRae, PhD Contents | Introduction | Literature review | Methodology | Results Discussion | Conclusions Further Research | References 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Definitions 1.2 General history 1.3 The state of the sustainable agriculture movement in Canada 1.4 The present state of agricultural...»

«J. MICHAEL BARRY Interviewed by Mary D. Bobo July 1, 1981 Tapes 1981-119, 1981-120 Oral History Center University of Louisville Archives and Records Center Tape 1981-119, side 1 Mary Bobo : My name is Mary D. Bobo of the University of Louisville Oral History Center. This is one in a series of interviews on the Courier Journal and Louisville Times newspapers. Today is July 1, 1981. I'm talking with Jay Michael Barry. His date of birth was August 6, 1909, his place of birth Louisville, Kentucky....»

«THE MINERALOGICAL MAGAZINE AND JOURNAL OF T H E MINERALOGICAL SOCIETY No. 131. December, 1930. Vol. XXII. Biographical notices of mineralogists recently deceased. (Fourth series.) 1 By L. J. SPENCER, M.A., Sc.D., F.R.S. Keeper of Minerals in the British Museum of Natural History. [Communicated June 3, 1930.] I N91theyears, the average age lives, with a range in ages from 32 to following list of 40 is 68.2 years. Including previous lists, the average of 384 lives is 64.9 years. ARAUJO FERI~AZ...»

«Guide to Processed Collections in the University Archives Introduction The Brigham Young University Archives preserves records documenting the history of the university and its people as well as their impact on the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and society. This guide describes the processed collections housed by the University Archives. A processed collection is one that has been rehoused and carefully described with either a catalog record or a finding aid or, in many cases,...»

«HISTORY OF MUGHAL EMPIRE, GIS SUPPORT FOR WORLD HISTORY _ A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of San Diego State University _ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in Computer Science _ by Harpal S. Randhawa Spring 2013 iii Copyright © 2013 by Harpal S. Randhawa All Rights Reserved iv Abstract OF THE THESIS History of Mughal Empire, GIS Support for World History by Harpal S. Randhawa Master of Science in Computer Science San Diego State University, 2013 This...»

«K I C,C Cosmology@KICC – Talks Author: Hardip Sanghera Outreach: KICC, Cambridge, Sept 2014 Overview Astronomers are in the very fortunate position of having a natural time machine. As they observe ever deeper into the cosmos using ever more powerful telescopes, they see the history of the Universe laid out. In the last century our observations and deductions have resulted in cosmology moving from the realm of speculation to firm foundations. Observations of receding galaxies and the cosmic...»

«6.0 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER OF MALDON DISTRICT 191 6.0 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER OF MALDON DISTRICT 6.1 General 6.1.1 This section of the report provides the detailed ‘profiles’ of Landscape Character Areas within Maldon District, structured as follows: Location of character area (map) Boundaries of character area (map) Photograph Key characteristics Overall character description Visual characteristics Historic land use Ecological features Key planning and land management issues Sensitivities to...»

«Anthony A. Briggman 1531 Dickey Drive, Suite 442 404.727.6342 (O) Atlanta, Georgia 30322 USA abriggm@emory.edu Academic Positions Assistant Professor of the History of Early Christianity, Emory University Candler School of Theology, 2011-present Graduate Division of Religion Faculty, Historical Studies in Theology and Religion, 2011-present Affiliated faculty, Hebrew Bible, 2013-present Adjunct Professor, Marquette University, 2009-2011 Rev. John P. Raynor, S.J., Fellow, Marquette University,...»

«Pipelines 2013 © ASCE 2013 340 Development History and Characteristics of the Bar-Wrapped Concrete Cylinder Pipe By: Henry Bardakjian1, P.E. and Mike Murphy2, P.E. Consulting Engineer, 1331 N. Maryland Ave, Glendale, CA 91207 Email: hbardakjian@gmail.com Chief Engineer, NOV Ameron, 10681 Foothill Blvd, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91750 Email: Mike.Murphy@nov.com ABSTRACT Bar-Wrapped Concrete Cylinder Pipe (CCP), and the reasons why its configuration enhances its structural performance, may not be...»

«LEVINSON FOR BP 2/4/2009 9:50:49 PM MISINTERPRETING “SOUNDS OF SILENCE”: WHY COURTS SHOULD NOT “IMPLY” CONGRESSIONAL PRECLUSION OF § 1983 CONSTITUTIONAL CLAIMS Rosalie Berger Levinson* Despite the clear text of 42 U.S.C. § 1983, its promise to protect constitutional rights has been obfuscated by the theory that Congress, by enacting civil rights laws, has “impliedly” foreclosed the historic use of § 1983 to vindicate constitutional wrongdoing. Increasingly, plaintiffs are being...»

«Mitra, Tapas, Mitra, Sheuli Growth symbiosis of Kolkata region RSA Conference, 2015 Region, Periphery and the City Core: Transformations in Morphology and Growth Symbiosis: A Case of Kolkata City and Region First Author: Tapas Mitra, Associate Professor, Department of Architecture, School of Planning and Architecture, Bhopal, India. Co-author: Sheuli Mitra, Associate Professor, Department of Planning, School of Planning and Architecture, Bhopal, India. _ Abstract: The urbanization and growth of...»

«Harpers Ferry / Learning Activities Introduction Now it is time to explore reactions to John Brown’s raid, decide what this raid means to you, and give voice to your community by writing a letter to a newspaper editor. First, you will design a character for yourself, a free African American who lived in or near Harpers Ferry in 1859. Second, you will make choices to define your character and their life. Third, you will investigate the historic resources using your analytical skills to asses...»

<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.dissertation.xlibx.info - Dissertations, online materials

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.