WWW.DISSERTATION.XLIBX.INFO
FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Dissertations, online materials
 
<< HOME
CONTACTS



Pages:   || 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |   ...   | 13 |

«CD-uppsats i sociologi, 30 hp Autonomy, asceticism, agonism – Max Weber’s scientific objectivity as idea, practice and politics Adam Netzén ...»

-- [ Page 1 ] --

CD-uppsats

i sociologi, 30 hp

Autonomy, asceticism, agonism

– Max Weber’s scientific objectivity as idea,

practice and politics

Adam Netzén

Handledare: Mark Elam

VT 2009

Abstract

Title: Autonomy, asceticism, agonism – Max Weber’s scientific objectivity as

idea, practice and politics

Author: Adam Netzén

Supervisor: Mark Elam

Examiner: Micael Björk

Type of work: CD essay

Time: September 2009

Purpose and research questions: The aim of this study is to investigate the

internal logic and the external context of Weber’s writings about objectivity.

This is done both through a theoretical investigation of the texts and through using Weber as a case study of the relation between scientific and cultural values. What is the internal logic and the historical specificity of Weber’s account of objectivity? What role does the external social, political and cultural context play in shaping the form that these standards of objectivity have?

How are questions of scientific methodology connected to wider cosmological issues?

Method and material: Drawing upon perspectives from contemporary science studies as well as from Weber studies, I will develop an analytical model of variants of objectivity. This model is used for explicating the details of Weber’s version of objectivity, as well as clarifying what type of subject that it posits. I perform a close reading of parts of Weber’s methodology, examining his attempts to co-produce social and scientific order. The primary empirical material consists of a selection of Weber’s texts on methodology, science and politics.

Main result: The historically specific form of Max Weber’s view of objectivity depends partly on his views of science, the self, politics and ethics. Some of the factors that take part in motivating and shaping his form of objectivity include Puritan asceticism, the German tradition of Bildung, and an agonistic understanding of politics. On multiple levels, objectivity is meant to safeguard autonomy.

Table of contents

1. Introduction 4 Background 4 Focus 6 Purpose 7 Research questions 7 Methodological approach: Science and other parts of society 8 Method 9 Disposition 10 Empirical material 11

2. Objectivity today 12

2.1 The

–  –  –

1. Introduction Background When doing science, we use methods. Methods are supposed to guarantee the validity of the results we attain. Underlying every set of methods is a wider methodology – whether this is acknowledged or not – against which the methods in question gain their meaning and validity.

The Oxford dictionary of sociology states the following:

The principal concern of methodology is wider philosophy of science issues […], and the study of how, in practice, [researchers] go about their work, how they conduct investigations and assess evidence, how they decide what is true and false. (Scott & Marshall (eds.) 2005) A methodology can be said to contain answers to the question of how to carry out proper science. Different varieties will prescribe different methods, and these methods can not be judged entirely independently of methodological views. There is no outside point without implicit methodological presuppositions from which to judge the validity of science. In most methodologies, the question of how to achieve objectivity is of high priority. Objectivity is seen as one of the distinguishing marks of science, so it is important that the researchers are objective. What does that mean? Despite the vast amount of literature that deals with the concept of objectivity, there seems to have emerged no consensus as to how the concept should be treated, or what it refers to. Several discussants agree that it is important to recognise that the concept refers to several areas, but then disagree about what these are. In theoretical discussions of objectivity, we may analytically distinguish three different approaches: Critique, reconstruction and diversification.

A) Critique of objectivity has been directed at such things as its objectifying tendencies, its instrumentality, its male bias, its disembodiment, the impossibility of a view from nowhere, the scientific attitude’s lack of emotion and concern for human values, etc. In the light of this criticism, some have concluded that belief in objectivity or parts thereof is naïve or harmful.

A few see it as a dysfunctional ideal that needs to be wholly rejected, even though that is an unusual standpoint. B) Reconstruction of objectivity combines a measure of criticism with the claim that there are still valuable components to retain. It has been conceded that the critique is valid against an orthodox (instrumental, positivistic or androcentric) view of objectivity, but that it is possible to reformulate the concept in a form which avoids this critique. Several commentators have also noted the ethical and practical relevance of retaining a functioning concept of objectivity, and to avoid what seems as relativistic consequences of an all-out rejection. 1 C) Diversification of the concept has followed from empirical studies of scientific The defence of ’strong objectivity’ in the works of Sandra Harding, is one of the more well-known attempts at reconstruction.





practice, as well as historical investigations. This type of research has made the image of scientific activity and reasoning more complex, and deepened our understanding of the multitude of factors that contribute to knowledge production. Among other things, the results have shown that it is far from obvious just what the common sense terms ‘science’ and ‘objectivity’ mean. 2 According to philosopher of science Ian Hacking, one important finding of some of this research is that ‘epistemological concepts are not constants, free-standing ideas that are just there, timelessly.’ They have histories, and histories are always social processes, involving institutions, power, language, practices and subjects. (Hacking 2002: 8) Therefore, a sociological perspective can enrich the understanding also of methodological and epistemological issues.

The diversification of objectivity is connected to an increased empirical interest generally in the guiding principles of scientific practice. Many acknowledge today that the aims found in methodologies are values. This discussion was opened up more generally by Thomas Kuhn, showing that criteria for theory choice are best understood as values. How do we judge the rationality or validity of a theory? We need some measure in order to judge the scientific merits of a theory or method. The criteria for doing this have to be weighed against each other, and there can be no method or formula to tell us precisely how to do that. New scientific values may emerge while some fall out of fashion, as e.g. utility has done. (Kuhn

1977) Ideals of good science change over time, including the criteria by which we judge scientific competence and proper research. (Nilsson 2009) Some scholars refer to these scientific values as virtues since, just like moral virtues, they stand as regulative ideals for action, fostering the individuals who adhere to them and may also stand in tension to each other. The values in the service of scientific reason are also referred to as epistemic, cognitive, theoretical or intellectual values. Scientific values include (among others) empirical adequacy, simplicity, complexity, scope, accuracy, fruitfulness, certainty, internal coherence, external consistency with accepted theories, replicability, precision, utility, quantification and objectivity. Some have then wanted to make a distinction between the values present on the inside of science, which are intrinsic to scientific practice, and those on the outside. The outside values are then labelled cultural, contextual or noncognitive values. The nature and validity of the distinction between scientific and cultural values is currently debated. Some argue that cultural values affect how scientific values rise to prominence, and how they are weighed against each other. In different ways, Lorraine Daston, Stephen Toulmin and Helen Longino all hold that the distinction is not clear-cut and unambiguous. Others wish to strictly demarcate the two types of values from each other, in I here have in mind sociologists such as Robert Proctor, Harry Collins, Trevor Pinch, and Bruno Latour, and historians such as Lorraine Daston, Peter Dear, Stephen Toulmin, Peter Galison, Theodore M. Porter, Simon Schaffer, Steven Shapin and Julie Robin Solomon. Also philosophers such as Ian Hacking and Hilary Putnam have produced useful works to this effect.

order to keep culture and society outside of science. (Daston 1991, 1994, 1995, Daston & Galison 1992, 2007, Dear 1992, Kincaid, Dupré & Wylie (eds.) 2007, Lacey 1999, Longino 1990, 1995, Porter 1994, Potter 1995) If we follow the insights developed by Toulmin, Daston, Galison, Longino and others, methodological debates appear as struggles over scientific values. Scientific values are stressed differently in different contexts, and always have to be weighed against each other.

With this in mind, it would be interesting to see if other factors could be found that affect how the choice between scientific values is performed. Do cultural values play a part in this? If so, is this directly or indirectly? What is the relation between scientific and cultural values? The inside of science is normally seen as being free from cultural values and politics. We could well ask: Do methodologies have politics?

Daston & Galison argue that epistemologies are motivated by fear of what improper knowledge might lead to. (Daston & Galison 2007: 49) Richard Bernstein introduced the term Cartesian anxiety to describe the concern for certainty that Descartes in the 17th century established as central for modern philosophy. Descartes was seriously worried about the consequences of not achieving certain knowledge. (Bernstein 1983: 16-19) Stephen Toulmin analyses this anxiety and the existential and political concerns that underlie it, to show how Descartes’ epistemology arises out of its socio-political context. To understand Descartes epistemology and the standards of scientific validity that it proposes, one must understand the cultural currents and political struggles at the time. (Toulmin 1990, see also 2001 and 1961) In a similar case, Julie Robin Solomon shows how Francis Bacon’s political concerns are present in his methodology. His conceptions of the royal and the real are closely linked. The authority of the monarch is transferred unto nature, or matter. His defence of good science is at the same time an advocacy of royal power. (Solomon 1998) Focus Against this background, it becomes interesting to turn to a classic theoretician of both scientific objectivity and the relation between science and values: Max Weber. If there are different varieties of objectivity, the question arises how Weber’s account fit in with others.

What is specific about it, and how does it fare in the light of critical discussions? Weber’s objectivity focuses much on the relation between science, values and politics. How do the current debate and Weber’s account illuminate each other? Bernstein talks of a Cartesian anxiety for certainty. In a similar vein, we may talk of a Weberian anxiety for objectivity.

When reading Weber it is clear that these are matters of grave importance for him. He argues passionately against erroneous methodologies and appears to be deeply concerned about objectivity. What are the anxieties and concerns behind his methodological writings?

Weber provides an interesting case since he is not the simple-minded positivist or objectivist that some believe, but shows instead how culture, concepts, imagination and passions are always present in science. Weber is seen by many as a landmark in the history of science, one of the very first to articulate an ideal that since then has gained widespread acceptance. It has been commonplace to hold up value-freedom as an ideal worth following in science.

(Eliaeson 2002) The renowned Weber scholar Wilhelm Hennis claims that Weber’s ideal should be followed the way it is. (Hennis 1994) Sverker Gustavsson takes Weber to have provided the best solution so far of how to organise the relation between science and politics.

(Gustavsson 1971) Gustavsson has had a large influence upon the last decades of Swedish science policy. (Elam & Glimell 2004) However, even if Weber’s account of scientific objectivity is sophisticated and complex, it still holds problems and tensions. Some of these become more clearly visible in the light of recent scholarship. Weber studies normally do not refer to the large body of research on objectivity and the relation between science and culture, even though it has direct relevance for the issues that Weber discussed. The questions of the relation between science and politics, and between rational knowledge seeking and cultural values, are as pertinent as ever. Recent developments in science studies have perhaps made them even more pressing. Weber is in focus in this study, but the findings should be relevant for contemporary issues of science and politics.

Purpose The aim of this study is to investigate both the internal logic and the external context of Weber’s objectivity. My aim is to reconstruct Weber’s theoretical arguments and the presuppositions they rest upon to see how his account analytically fits together, while at the same time tracing some of the empirical causal connections, social interests and cultural influences that contributed to making his methodology of objectivity into what it is. Weber’s methodological writings are examined both to see what Weber theoretically says on the

matter and what the case empirically shows us. The study thus has a twofold aim:

• To re-examine Weber’s theoretical contribution, with the help of recent scholarship on objectivity and other scientific values and explicate its internal logic. This may expand our understanding of Weber’s concept of objectivity, showing its historical specificity and its strengths and weaknesses.

• To situate Weber in his historical context and use this as a case study of the relation between cultural values and scientific values. This will clarify the relation between scientific text and social-historical context. This may illuminate the present debate, through investigating the relation between inside and outside of science.



Pages:   || 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |   ...   | 13 |


Similar works:

«ISSN 2320-5407 International Journal of Advanced Research (2014), Volume 2, Issue 2, 432-442 Journal homepage: http://www.journalijar.com INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED RESEARCH RESEARCH ARTICLE INTERNATIONAL LAW CONCEPTION IN MANAGEMENT THE OUTERMOST ISLANDS OF INDONESIA *Josina A.Y.Wattimena1, Alma Manuputty2, Muhammad Ashri2, Farida Patittingi2 1. Faculty Of Law. Pattimura University, Ambon. Indonesia 2. Faculty Of Law. Hasanuddin University, Makassar. Indonesia Manuscript Info Abstract...»

«SURALARTICLE30-3.DOCX 4/13/2009 2:45 PM ISLAMIC OUTFITS IN THE WORKPLACE IN TURKEY, A MUSLIM MAJORITY COUNTRY Nurhan Süral† This article attempts to explore the ways in which the headscarf issue is invoked to characterize differentiated visions of secularism in Turkey’s sociopolitical structure and history. It attempts to assess the legitimacy of laws and practices that restrict a large segment’s religious and cultural practices. The headscarf is a symbol of controversies causing...»

«5.2 DOCUMENT Consultation Report Appendices Volume 2 National Grid (North London Reinforcement Project) Order Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 Section 37(3)(c) and Section 37(7) Planning Act 2008 Application Reference: EN020009 August 2012 14. APPENDICES Appendix 1 Schedule of prescribed consultees (Stage One) London Councils • East of England Local Government Association • Health and Safety Executive • London SHA • NHS East of...»

«Basel LNP, a discrete Preamplifier for VPT/T (&APD) readout, Preliminary Datasheet model SP883d Manual/Datasheet Preamplifier SP883d Author: Werner Erni Experimental Particle Physics Group of Prof. Dr. Bernd Krusche in collaboration with Dr. Irakli Keshelashvili, Michael Steinacher, Universität Basel, CH; Universität Bochum, D; GSI Darmstadt, D; KVI Groningen, NL Status: Preliminary Draft Revision History Version 0.1; December 23, 2010/Werner Erni Version 0.5.8; August 3, 2011/Werner Erni...»

«Aristocracia, cavalaria, nobreza; alguns momentos historiográficos sobre nascimento e instalação de dominação social na Idade Média OLGA PISNITCHENKO* A natureza, a forma, o poder, a existência inclusive de uma nobreza, ou de alguns de suas componentes, como, por exemplo, a cavalaria em um ou outro período da Idade Media, constituem há muito tempo o objeto de vivas discussões. De acordo com Joseph Morsel o fenômeno nobiliário.se muestra em la actualidad poco inteligible e bastante...»

«2 Vatican Assassins Title Page, Copyright, Assassins & Maxims 3 Vatican Assassins: “Wounded In The House Of My Friends” The Diabolical History of The Society of Jesus Including: Its Second Thirty Years’ War (1914 1945), Its Cold War (1945 1989), And Its Assassination of America’s First Roman Catholic President, Knight of Columbus John Fitzgerald Kennedy (1963) By Eric Jon Phelps White Separatist American Freeman Dispensational, Fifth Monarchy, Seventh-Day Baptist-Calvinist 4 Vatican...»

«www.freep.com | Printer-friendly article page Page 1 of 6 July 4, 2010 50 signature foods of metro Detroit BY SYLVIA RECTOR FREE PRESS RESTAURANT CRITIC What's on our Fourth of July table? This much is certain: You won't find metro Detroit's collective menu anywhere else in America. It's coneys, hummus, Greek salads and peach cobbler. artisan bread, pad thai, berry pie and baklava. square pizzas, sliders and salsa. It's Faygo and Vernors, Redcoat Tavern and Miller's, Buddy's and Little...»

«The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project AMBASSADOR MYLES R. R. FRECHETTE Interviewed by: Charles Stuart Kennedy Initial interview date: September 4, 2001 Copyright 2015 ADST [Note: This interview was not edited by Ambassador Frechette.] Q: Today is September 4, 2001. This is an interview with Myles Frechette. This is being done on behalf of the Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training and I’m Charles Stuart Kennedy. Myles, what’s your...»

«SLUMBER FALLS CONTEXT Slumber Falls Camp located at 3610 River Road, New Braunfels, Comal County, Texas, 78132, achieved significance during the Comal County Historic Resource Survey for its association with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad pattern of our history. According to the report, “Slumber Falls is important for its association with the county’s tourism industry that began in the mid-twentieth century, particularly along River Road. As roads were...»

«Joel Parker Whitney The Richest Man in Placer County By Ken Morrow – January 2013 Member of Rocklin Historical Society (RHS), Rocklin, California Before I begin I want to acknowledge the sources on which I have relied. I owe a big debt of gratitude to Jean and Gary Day who are members of the Rocklin Historical Society. Jean has done a tremendous amount of research on the Whitney family, and Gary has published many articles about Joel Parker Whitney and his Spring Valley Ranch. The Joel Parker...»

«Article Making (Anti)Modern Childhood: Producing and Consuming Toys in Late Victorian Canada Braden P. L. Hutchinson Scientia Canadensis: Canadian Journal of the History of Science, Technology and Medicine / Scientia Canadensis : revue canadienne d'histoire des sciences, des techniques et de la médecine, vol. 36, n° 1, 2013, p. 79-110.Pour citer cet article, utiliser l'information suivante : URI: http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1025790ar DOI: 10.7202/1025790ar Note : les règles d'écriture...»

«14 The Comparative and International Education Society of Canada (CIESC) Suzanne MAJHANOVICH & ZHANG Lanlin The Comparative and International Education Society of Canada/Société canadienne d’éducation comparée et internationale (CIESC/SCECI) was established on 5 June 1967. As an educational society in an officially-bilingual country, the society from the outset has been a bilingual organisation with its Constitution in both English and French. Conference papers may be in either language,...»





 
<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.dissertation.xlibx.info - Dissertations, online materials

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.