WWW.DISSERTATION.XLIBX.INFO
FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Dissertations, online materials
 
<< HOME
CONTACTS



Pages:   || 2 |

«WHAT IT IS, HOW IT WORKS, BENEFITS, WHAT REMAINS TO BE DONE Automatic Exchange of Information WHAT IT IS, HOW IT WORKS, BENEFITS, WHAT REMAINS TO BE ...»

-- [ Page 1 ] --

Automatic Exchange of Information

WHAT IT IS, HOW IT WORKS, BENEFITS,

WHAT REMAINS TO BE DONE

Automatic Exchange of Information

WHAT IT IS, HOW IT WORKS, BENEFITS,

WHAT REMAINS TO BE DONE

ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION

AND DEVELOPMENT

The OECD is a unique forum where governments work together to address the economic, social and environmental challenges of globalisation. The OECD is also at the forefront of efforts to understand and to help governments respond to new developments and concerns, such as corporate governance, the information economy and the challenges of an ageing population. The Organisation provides a setting where governments can compare policy experiences, seek answers to common problems, identify good practice and work to co-ordinate domestic and international policies.

The OECD member countries are: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Chile, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, the Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States. The European Union takes part in the work of the OECD.

Photo credits: cover photo © Julien Eichinger – Fotolia.com TABLE OF CONTENTS – 3

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. Introduction

II. What is automatic exchange of information?

III. How does automatic exchange of information work?

IV. What is the legal basis for automatic exchange?

V. Current state of play

VI. Does automatic exchange work?

VII. What is the OECD doing in this area and what still needs to be done?............ 21

AUTOMATIC EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION © OECD 2012

INTRODUCTION – 5

I. INTRODUCTION

As the world becomes increasingly globalised and cross-border activities become the norm, tax administrations need to work together to ensure that taxpayers pay the right amount of tax to the right jurisdiction.

An open international architecture where taxpayers operate cross-border but tax administrations remain confined to their national borders, can only be sustained where tax administrations co-operate. One key aspect of international tax co-operation is exchange of information.

Exchange of information comes in different forms and includes exchange upon request, spontaneous information exchange and automatic exchange of information. The OECD has a long history of working on all forms of information exchange and Article 26 of the OECD Model Convention provides a basis for all three forms of information exchange.

The OECD’s work on exchange upon request and the more recent peer review work of the Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information 1 are well known. The OECD also works on other forms of exchange of information, including automatic exchange of information, where it has been active in facilitating such exchanges for many years.

The OECD’s work in this area is focused on helping make automatic information exchange into an effective compliance tool for countries wishing to use it and does not suggest a change in the current international standard, which is information exchange upon request.

The work has ranged from creating the legal framework for such information exchanges to developing technical standards and seeking to improve automatic exchange at a practical level. In addition, the OECD has produced guidance on automatic exchange and provided training to countries interested in developing the necessary framework and operating automatic exchange on a practical level.

1 See www.oecd.org/tax/transparency.

AUTOMATIC EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION © OECD 2012

6 – INTRODUCTION Another key component in connection with automatic exchange of information is the need to ensure that information exchanged is kept confidential. This aspect has long been a key focus for the OECD in respect of all forms of exchange of information, not just automatic exchange, but it is particularly pronounced in the automatic exchange area. To engage in exchange of information, and in particular automatic exchange of information, countries need a high degree of comfort that the information is kept confidential both in law and in practice and is only used for the purposes allowed under the applicable exchange instrument.

This report informs the wider public on key aspects of automatic exchange of information and the work of the OECD in this area. In

particular it answers the following basic questions:

–  –  –

II. WHAT IS AUTOMATIC EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION?

The automatic exchange of information2 is understood to involve the systematic and periodic transmission of “bulk” taxpayer information by the source country to the residence country concerning various categories of income (e.g. dividends, interest, royalties, salaries, pensions, etc.).





The information which is exchanged automatically is normally collected in the source country on a routine basis, generally through reporting of the payments by the payer (financial institution, employer, etc). Automatic exchange can also be used to transmit other types of useful information such as changes of residence, the purchase or disposition of immovable property, value added tax refunds, etc. As a result, the tax authority of a taxpayer’s country of residence can check its tax records to verify that taxpayers have accurately reported their foreign source income. In addition, information concerning the acquisition of significant assets may be used to evaluate the net worth of an individual, to see if the reported income reasonably supports the transaction.

2 Also called routine exchange by some countries.

–  –  –

III. HOW DOES AUTOMATIC EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION WORK?

The basic process of automatic exchange of information can be

divided into seven steps:

–  –  –

2. Payer or paying agent reports information to the tax authorities.

3. Tax authorities consolidate information by country of residence.

–  –  –

The process starts with the provision, by a taxpayer, of information regarding his or her identity to a payer or paying agent and/or with the generation of information by the payer or paying agent (first step).

According to domestic rules in the source country, payers and paying agents are required to report to the tax authorities information regarding the identity of the non-resident taxpayer as well as payments made to them (second step). Once the information has been received by the source country tax authorities the information will be consolidated and bundled according to the country of residence (third step). Next, information is transmitted from the source country to the residence 3 While most tax systems operate in this way, some require the taxpayer to file a refund claim directly to the tax administration. It is from this refund claim that the tax administration obtains the information to exchange.

AUTOMATIC EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION © OECD 2012

10 – HOW DOES AUTOMATIC EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION WORK?

country. The source country must ensure that the transmission is done securely, with a sufficient level of encryption. Information may be transmitted electronically or by CD ROMs. If the CD ROMs are sent by mail, it must be done via an international registration system where a mail tracking function is in place (fourth step).

The fifth step in the process is the receipt and decryption of the information by the residence country tax authorities. Next, relevant information will be fed into an automatic or manual matching process.

The processing and use of the information varies from country to country depending on the risk assessment parameters, processing and technology systems used. The key aspect is to be able to identify the taxpayer and “match” the information with the domestic records. In this respect many countries have developed sophisticated automatic matching systems, allowing them to run all of the information received through a database to identify matches. This is often followed up by manual matching of the previously unmatched data. Other countries use only a manual matching system (sixth step). Based on the results of the matching process, the tax authorities may commence compliance action against a taxpayer that may not have complied with reporting obligations, or make a specific request for information from the source country to obtain additional information. In addition to using the specific information received, some countries use the information for more general risk assessment (seventh step).

Throughout the entire process feedback can be given from the receiving to the sending country, but also from the country collecting the information to the reporting payers or paying agents.

–  –  –

IV. WHAT IS THE LEGAL BASIS FOR AUTOMATIC EXCHANGE?

The legal basis for the automatic exchange of information is generally (1) the exchange of information provision of a double taxation convention based on Article 26 of the OECD or UN Model Convention, (2) Article 6 of the Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters, or (3) for EU member countries, domestic laws implementing EU directives which provide for automatic exchange.

While the treaty law contains the legal basis for automatic exchange including rules on reciprocity some countries require, and others have a policy to require, a special working agreement or memorandum of understanding (MOU) setting forth the terms and conditions of the proposed automatic exchange. Such an MOU typically sets forth the types of information to be exchanged automatically, details about the procedures of sending and receiving information and the appropriate format to use. The OECD has designed a Model Memorandum of Understanding on Automatic Exchange 4 that can be used as a basis for an operational working agreement between tax administrations. The Multilateral Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters specifically requires an agreement between the Parties willing to provide each other information automatically.

4 See C(2001)28/FINAL (available under www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=C(2001)28/FINAL& docLanguage=En)

–  –  –

Results of a recent survey on automatic exchange conducted by the OECD 5,6 show widespread use of automatic exchange of information regarding country coverage and income types, transaction values and records exchanged. Certain facts and figures in each of these areas are summarised below.

Country coverage and income types Automatic exchange is widely used both within and outside the European Union (EU) with many non-EU members having extensive automatic exchange relationships. Among the most frequently exchanged income types are: interest, dividends, royalties, income from dependent services and pensions. All 38 countries (100%) receive information automatically from treaty partners and 33 (85%) of them send information automatically to treaty partners. Denmark, as the country with the largest number of automatic exchange relationships sends information automatically to 70 countries. The charts below give further details on country coverage.

5 Responses were received from the following countries that participate in the work of the OECD’s Committee on Fiscal Affairs: Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Chile, China, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, India, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Russia, the Slovak Republic, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States.

6 The statistical data for Israel are supplied by and under the responsibility of the relevant Israeli authorities. The use of such data by the OECD is without prejudice to the status of the Golan Heights, East Jerusalem and Israeli settlements in the West Bank under the terms of international law.

AUTOMATIC EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION © OECD 2012

16 – CURRENT STATE OF PLAY

–  –  –

Transaction value relates to the amounts of income and capital reported on records exchanged automatically. The survey shows that the amounts represented by records received can range from as little as several million of Euros to well over EUR 200 billion for a particular year. 7 Five countries, including Italy, reported receiving records relating to more than EUR 15 billion each in a particular year. Further, most countries reported exchanging information in the billions of Euros.

While these amounts do not represent tax but income and assets, applying average tax rates to such amounts and even assuming a low non-compliance rate can add up to significant numbers.

–  –  –

7 Depending on the last year of available statistics in a country, the year for which the information was provided may vary.

8 Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom, United States.

9 Depending on the last year of available statistics in a country, the year for which the information was provided may vary.

10 The following 31 countries provided numbers of records sent: Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Canada, Chile, China, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Iceland, India, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, the United Kingdom and the United States.

–  –  –



Pages:   || 2 |


Similar works:

«13 Vijay K. Bhatia* & Christopher N. Candlin* Analysing Arbitration Laws across Legal Systems Abstract In this paper, the national Indian and Chinese statutes on arbitration are compared with the UNCITRAL Model Law. After a presentation of the GILD-MMC project, focus is especially on textual aspects indicating attitudes towards the relation between the administrative powers and the parties in commercial arbitration. Thus, looking at the features all-inclusiveness, information load, information...»

«Education Policy in the Republic of Korea: Building Block or Stumbling Block? Jisoon Lee School of Economics Seoul National University Copyright © 2002 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank 1818 H Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20433, U.S.A. The World Bank enjoys copyright under protocol 2 of the Universal Copyright Convention. This material may nonetheless be copied for research, educational, or scholarly purposes only in the member countries of The World...»

«Zhuping Liu June 2016 McCombs School of Business Mobile: (860) 336-8705 University of Texas at Austin Fax: (512) 471-1034 2110 Speedway Stop B6700 Zhuping.Liu@mccombs.utexas.edu Austin, Texas 78712-1275 sites.utexas.edu/zhuping-liu/ Education Ph.D., Marketing, 2017 (expected) McCombs School of Business, University of Texas at Austin Dissertation proposal defended in April 2016 Advisors: Vijay Mahajan and Frenkel ter Hofstede M.S., Statistics, 2012 Ph.D. student in Operations and Information...»

«SHOULD SUBURBS HELP THEIR CENTRAL CITY? by Andrew F. Haughwout* and Robert P. Inman** April, 2002 ABSTRACT Should suburbs help finance the core public services of their central city? Previous arguments for such assistance have stressed spillovers from city services to suburban residents or the fact that suburban residents (should?) care about their city’s poor. We explore the validity of a third possible argument for such assistance, one now stressed by many large city mayors. Suburban...»

«ASIA NEW ACTIVE INVESTMENT SYMPOSIUM Location: Waldorf Astoria Shanghai on the Bund, Shanghai, China Wednesday 22 – Thursday 23 June 2016 ‘As at 9 May 2016, subject to change’ 1 Asia New Active Investment Symposium Shanghai, China Wednesday 22 – Thursday 23 June 2016 VENUE INFORMATION Waldorf Astoria Shanghai on the Bund No.2 Zhongshan Dong Yi Road Huang Pu District Shanghai 200002, P.R. China Tel: +86 21 6322 9988 Fax: +86 21 6321 9888 www.waldorfastoriashanghai.com Suggested attire C...»

«Curriculum Vita Vijay Atluri Professor Management Science and Information Systems Department Rutgers Business School, Newark and New Brunswick Rutgers University Newark, NJ 07102 973-353-1642 (phone), 973-353-5003 (fax) email: atluri at rutgers dot edu home page: http://cimic.rutgers.edu/∼atluri/ EDUCATION: • Ph.D., Information Technology, May, 1994, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA. Dissertation: Concurrency Control in Multilevel Secure Databases Dissertation Adviser: Sushil Jajodia...»

«Algorithmic Social Sciences Research Unit ASSRU Department of Economics University of Trento Via Inama 5 381 22 Trento, Italy Discussion Paper Series 3 – 2013/I It is not too late Economics Nobel Prizes for a Trio of pioneers Uzawa, Scarf and Negishi K. Vela Velupillai March 2013  Tennyson’s noble lines in Ulysses (italics added) are the inspiration for this phrase: Death closes all; but something ere the end, Some work of noble note, may yet be done, Not unbecoming men that strove...»

«IMPLEMENTING INFORMATION SYSTEMS TO SUPPORT KNOWLEDGE WORK: AN EXPLORATION OF WORK MOTIFS Davis, Christopher J., College of Business, University of South Florida St Petersburg. davisc@stpt.usf.edu Hunagel, Ellen M., College of Business, University of South Florida St Petersburg. hufnagel@stpt.usf.edu Abstract The research presented in this paper is part of a larger study of the organizational impacts of information systems on knowledge work. The phase of the research reported in the paper...»

«HARBOUR INVESTMENT CHRONOMETER AUSTRALASIAN EQUITY FUND REPORT – JULY 2016 5 August 2016 | andrew@harbourasset.co.nz | craig@harbourasset.co.nz| shane@harbourasset.co.nz OVERVIEW FOR THE MONTH  The New Zealand S&P/NZX 50 returned +6.5% over July while the Australian S&P/ASX 200 returned +6.3% (+7.2% in NZ Dollar terms) their fourth best monthly performance since the 2009 post GFC bounce back period. The MSCI World developed markets index rose 4.1% (in local currency terms).  With more...»

«Journal of Property Investment & Finance Emerald Article: A vision for valuation Barry Gilbertson, Duncan Preston Article information: To cite this document: Barry Gilbertson, Duncan Preston, (2005),A vision for valuation, Journal of Property Investment & Finance, Vol. 23 Iss: 2 pp. 123 140 Permanent link to this document: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14635780510699998 Downloaded on: 20-06-2012 References: This document contains references to 27 other documents Citations: This document has been...»

«VIJAY G. SUBRAMANIAN EECS Dept., Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Rd, Tech L359, Evanston IL 60208-3118 USA. +18474675168(O),+18474914455(F), v-subramanian@northwestern.edu, http://users.eecs.northwestern.edu/~vjsubram EDUCATION Ph.D. Electrical Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign – October 1999. Dissertation: Broadband Fading Channels: Signal Burstiness and Capacity. Master of Science (Engineering) (M.Sc.(Eng)), Electrical Communication Engineering, Indian Institute...»

«Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University Finance Dissertations Department of Finance 1-12-2012 Agency Problems in Target-Date Funds Vallapuzha Sandhya Georgia State University Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.gsu.edu/finance_diss Recommended Citation Sandhya, Vallapuzha, Agency Problems in Target-Date Funds. Dissertation, Georgia State University, 2012. http://scholarworks.gsu.edu/finance_diss/19 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and...»





 
<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.dissertation.xlibx.info - Dissertations, online materials

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.