WWW.DISSERTATION.XLIBX.INFO
FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Dissertations, online materials
 
<< HOME
CONTACTS



Pages:   || 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |   ...   | 6 |

«Co-operative Programme for Exchange of Scientific and Technical Information Concerning Nuclear Installations Decommissioning Projects Decontamination ...»

-- [ Page 1 ] --

Co-operative Programme for Exchange of Scientific and Technical

Information Concerning Nuclear Installations Decommissioning Projects

Decontamination Techniques

Used in Decommissioning Activities

A Report by the

NEA Task Group on Decontamination

NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY

ORGANISATION FOR THE ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction

1. Definition and general considerations

2. Objectives and selection criteria

2.1 Objectives of decontamination technologies for decommissioning

2.2 Selection of decontamination technologies for decommissioning

3. Survey of applied decontamination techniques

4. Characteristics of selected decontamination techniques for segmented components

4.1 General considerations

4.2 Chemical decontamination

4.2.1 General considerations

4.2.2 Chemical reagents

4.2.3 Spent decontamination solutions

4.2.4 Guidelines for selecting appropriate chemical decontamination techniques.............. 18 Advantages

Disadvantages

4.3 Electrochemical decontamination

4.3.1 General considerations

4.3.2 Chemical reagents

4.3.3 Secondary waste generation

4.3.4 Guidelines for selecting appropriate electrochemical decontamination techniques.... 21 Advantages

Disadvantages

4.4 Mechanical decontamination

4.4.1 General considerations

4.4.2 Abrasive-blasting decontamination systems

4.4.3 Abrasive media used

4.4.4 Secondary waste generation

4.4.5 Guidelines for selecting appropriate abrasive-blasting decontamination techniques

Advantages

Disadvantages

4.5 Decontamination by melting

4.5.1 General considerations

4.5.2 Current melting practices

4.5.3 Advantages of melting as decontamination technique

4.6 Other decontamination techniques

5. Characteristics of selected decontamination techniques for building surfaces

5.1 General considerations

5.2 Basic techniques

5.3 Scarifying

5.3.1 Needle scaling

5.3.2 Scabbling

5.3.3 Concrete shaving

5.3.4 Hydraulic/Pneumatic Hammering

5.3.5 Dust collection

5.3.6 Production rates

5.4 Guidelines for selecting appropriate decontamination techniques for building surfaces...... 33 Conclusions

Annex 1. List of task group members

Annex 2. Questionnaire on decontamination techniques for decommissioning

INTRODUCTION

Decontamination is a major decommissioning activity that may be used to accomplish several goals, such as reducing occupational exposures, limiting potential releases and uptakes of radioactive materials, permitting the reuse of components, and facilitating waste management. The decision to decontaminate should be weighed against the total dose and cost. This document presents both proven and emerging techniques which may be used to accomplish the goals stated above. The planner must familiarise himself or herself with these techniques to integrate decontamination with other decommissioning activities.

At its thirteenth meeting on October 20-23, 1992, in Rome, the Technical Advisory Group of the NEA Co-operative Programme for the Exchange of Scientific and Technical Information Concerning Nuclear Installations Decommissioning Projects established a Task Group on Decontamination in order to prepare a state-of-the-art report on decontamination in connection with decommissioning. The work focused on decontamination for dose reduction as well as for waste decategorisation or for conditional or unconditional release of materials. The decontamination of both metallic and concrete surfaces was considered.

During its early meetings, the group developed a questionnaire, which was sent to decommissioning project managers. The information requested in this questionnaire covered the technical and economical aspects of the selected decontamination techniques. Project managers were asked to complete a separate questionnaire for each specific application of a given process, including actual data on the efficiency of the process as well as data on operating and investment costs.

This overview of decontamination techniques is intended to describe some of the critical elements involved in choosing techniques to address practical decontamination problems.

This overview of decontamination techniques is based on the results of the previouslymentioned questionnaire, which was received, reviewed and summarised for this report by the Task Group. The information presented here is not exhaustive, but does represent the state-of-the-art, for the techniques mentioned, as of June 1998. This overview is intended to describe some of the critical elements involved in choosing techniques to address practical decontamination problems.

–  –  –

Decontamination is defined as the removal of contamination from surfaces of facilities or equipment by washing, heating, chemical or electrochemical action, mechanical cleaning, or other





techniques. In decommissioning programmes, the objectives of decontamination are:

• to reduce radiation exposure;

• to salvage equipment and materials;

• to reduce the volume of equipment and materials requiring storage and disposal in licensed disposal facilities;

• to restore the site and facility, or parts thereof, to an unconditional-use condition;

• to remove loose radioactive contaminants and fix the remaining contamination in place in preparation for protective storage or permanent disposal work activities; and

• to reduce the magnitude of the residual radioactive source in a protective storage mode for public health and safety reasons, to reduce the protective storage period or to minimise long-term monitoring and surveillance requirements.

Some form of decontamination is required in any decommissioning programme, regardless of the form of the end product. As a minimum, the floor, walls, and external structural surfaces within work areas should be cleaned of loose contamination, and a simple water rinsing of contaminated systems may be performed. The question will arise, however, whether to decontaminate piping systems, tanks and components.

A strong case may be made in favour of leaving adherent contamination within piping as well as components in a dispersed form on the internal metal surfaces rather than concentrating the radioactivity through decontamination. In most cases, decontamination is not sufficiently effective to allow unconditional release of the item without further treatment after dismantling. Therefore, savings both in occupational exposure and cost could be achieved by simply removing the contaminated system and its components and only performing certain packaging activities (e.g., welding end caps on pipe sections, using adequate equipment to cut and crimp smaller piping to reduce chances of airborne activity). However, additional cost for the disposal of materials must be weighed in this scenario.

A decontamination programme may also require a facility capable of treating secondary waste from decontamination (e.g., processing chemical solutions, aerosols, debris, etc.) The concentrated waste, representing a more significant radiation source, must be solidified and shipped for disposal in licensed disposal facilities unless properly treated in the waste reduction/recycling/ reclamation processing alternative. The optimal waste reduction configuration must be defined after an economic assessment of treatment versus transportation/disposal costs has been completed. Each of these

additional activities may increase:

• occupational exposure rates;

• the potential for a release;

• the uptake of radioactive material.

These could conceivably result in even higher doses than those received from removing, packaging and shipping the contaminated system without extensive decontamination. Resolution of this question depends on specific facts, such as the exposure rate of the gamma-emitting contamination, the contamination level, and the effectiveness of the containing component and piping (wall thickness) in reducing radiation fields in the work area.

–  –  –

2.1 Objectives of decontamination technologies for decommissioning There are three main reasons for considering the use of decontamination techniques.

The first reason is the importance of removing contamination from components or systems to reduce dose levels in the installations. Access to the installations could then be made easier so that it becomes possible to use hands-on techniques for dismantling rather than the more expensive use of robotics or manipulators.

A second reason is to minimise the potential for spreading contamination during decommissioning activities, especially when dealing with systems containing highly radioactive particles and actinides.

The third reason is that it may be possible to reduce the contamination of components or structures to such levels that they may be disposed of at a lower, and therefore more economical, waste treatment and disposal category or, indeed, be unconditionally released for recycling or reuse in the conventional industry or disposed of as waste exempt from regulatory concern.

Several decontamination techniques have been developed to support maintenance work in nuclear installations. With relative success, the same techniques have also been adopted when decommissioning nuclear installations and components (Table 1). Objectives differ between these applications, however.

In maintenance work, the highest degree of decontamination is sought, avoiding any damage to the component so that it may be adequately reused. In contrast, the main aim of decontamination for decommissioning is the removal of as much activity as possible, not only to decategorise waste, but to reach clearance levels so that the material from the system may be reused without radiological restrictions. In many cases, it will be necessary to remove all oxides liable to trap contaminants, as well as a thin layer of structural material in order to achieve this aim. The radionuclides indeed tend to concentrate in the intergranular regions, together with other impurities accumulated during the growth of the metal grains. Therefore, much more aggressive decontamination methods are required than those used during the service life of a plant. In this view, technical methods presenting high decontamination factors at high contamination levels do not always allow achievement of the very low levels required to release the material (e.g., inner surfaces of piping), without restrictions, provided that measurement of these very low levels is feasible.

During decontamination for maintenance, components and systems may not be damaged and the use of very aggressive decontamination methods is not appropriate. In decontamination for decommissioning, however, it is mainly the use of somewhat destructive techniques that present the possibilities of meeting the objectives to release the material at clearance levels.

Another aspect in which techniques for thorough decontamination of materials differ from maintenance or laboratory scale decontamination is the need for industrialisation. The large amount of contaminated materials produced during decommissioning procedures and available for decontamination, generally do not favour methods or techniques that are labour intensive or difficult to handle, or that present difficulties when automation is envisaged. The latter is also true in the case of full-system decontamination for maintenance.

Other factors presenting differing influences on the choice of techniques are, for example, secondary-waste production and the possibilities to recycle products from decontamination processes.

For both decontamination for maintenance and decontamination for decommissioning, these may be among the parameters for decision-making.

The absolute requirement to obtain effectively residual contamination levels that prove to be below clearance limits is also a factor of primary influence when making the choices of decontamination techniques to be used. Even if techniques for the decontamination of complex geometries (e.g., pipe bends, small diameter piping) exist, the non-accessibility of areas may prevent direct radiological measurements being used to show that the clearance levels are met.

Presently, the interest of the nuclear industry is moving from decontamination techniques for maintenance to decontamination for decommissioning. Limited data are available from decommissioning on the efficiency of usable techniques to meet the low unconditional-release criteria. In most cases, using available techniques, the clearance levels are only met in an asymptotic way. Not all methods and techniques available present the possibility of decontaminating to below the required clearance levels.

So, in some cases, decontamination is carried out in different stages, the last step specifically aiming to obtain the required objectives.

Based on these considerations, when selecting a specific technique for system and/or

component decontamination, mainly the following requirements must be considered:

• Safety – The application of the method should not result in increased radiation hazards due to external contamination of workers or even inhalation of radioactive dust and aerosols formed during its implementation; it should not add other hazards (e.g., chemical, electric, etc.).

• Efficiency – The method should be capable of removing radioactivity from a surface to the level which would enable hands-on work instead of robotics, or which would permit recycle/reuse of material or, at least, a lower waste treatment and disposal category.

• Cost-effectiveness – Where possible, equipment should be decontaminated and repaired for reuse; however, the method should not give rise to costs which would exceed the costs for waste treatment and disposal of the material, whether including replacement of the equipment or not.



Pages:   || 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |   ...   | 6 |


Similar works:

«Coin Sizes and Payments in Commodity Money Systems Angela Redish University of British Columbia Warren E. Weber∗ Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis University of Minnesota March 27, 2008 Abstract Commodity money standards in medieval and early modern Europe were characterized by recurring complaints of small change shortages and by numerous debasements of the coinage. To confront these facts, we build a random matching monetary model with two indivisible coins with different intrinsic...»

«Erasmus Exchange Report Nantes, France Second Semester 2015/2016 Aislinn Sonneveld S2545357 Table of Contents General report 1. Host institution and exact dates of semester abroad 2. Contact with home faculty, preparation and journey 3. Residence abroad 4. Grant 5. Study (general) 6. Other relevant information Specific report 1. Host institution and study abroad 2. Lectures and literature 3. Overview of the lecture program 4. Contents 5. Lecture-related activities 6. Relevance to Groningen...»

«Reserve Bank of Australia RESEARCH DISCUSSION PAPER Assessing Some Models of the Impact of Financial Stress upon Business Cycles Adrian Pagan and Tim Robinson RDP 2011-04 ASSESSING SOME MODELS OF THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL STRESS UPON BUSINESS CYCLES Adrian Pagan* and Tim Robinson** Research Discussion Paper 2011-04 December 2011 *University of Sydney **Economic Research Department, Reserve Bank of Australia The views expressed herein are those of the authors and are not necessarily those of the...»

«PROCESS FOR PASSAGE OF A PRIVATE BILL IN THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF MANITOBA A Private Bill relates directly to the affairs of an individual or group of individuals, including a corporation, named in the Bill; the Bill seeks something which cannot be obtained by means of the general law and is founded on a petition from an individual or group of individuals. The petitioner(s) should first determine that incorporation by passage of a Private Bill in the Legislative Assembly is the preferred way...»

«State of Alaska Department of Commerce, Community and Economic Development Division of Corporations, Business and Professional Licensing MORTUARY SCIENCES SECTION State Office Building, 333 Willoughby Avenue, 9th Floor PO Box 110806, Juneau, AK 99811-0806 Phone: (907) 465-3811  Fax: (907) 465-2974 E-mail: license@alaska.gov Website: http://commerce.alaska.gov/cbpl/pl EMBALMER TRAINEE PERMIT APPLICATION PACKET GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS Please read the application and all the instructions...»

«DAREN A. CONRAD The University of the West Indies Department of Economics St. Augustine Trinidad, West Indies Email: daren.conrad@sta.uwi.edu EDUCATION Ph.D. in Economics 05/07 Howard University, Washington DC 3.7/4.0 (Concentration: Development Economics & Monetary and Fiscal Economics) MA in Economics 05/02 Howard University, Washington DC 3.7/4.0 (Concentration: Development Economics & Urban Economics) BA in Economics 05/99 Howard University, Washington DC Magna cum Laude TEACHING INTERESTS...»

«“Torrent Pharmaceuticals Limited Conference Call” July 31, 2014 ANALYST: MR. ANSHUMAN GUPTA LEAD ANALYST PHARMACEUTICALS EDELWEISS FINANCIALS SECURITIES MANAGEMENT: MR. ASHOK MODI EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FINANCE – TORRENT PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED MR. SANJAY GUPTA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS TORRENT PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED MR. RUCHIR MODI – CHIEF MARKETING OFFICER TORRENT PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED Page 1 of 23 Torrent Pharmaceuticals Limited July 31, 2014 Moderator: Ladies and...»

«Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change UNEP WMO PROCEEDINGS Expert Meeting on Harmonizing forest-related definitions for use by various stakeholders Rome, 22-25 January 2002 FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2002 i ii Expert Meeting on Harmonizing forest-related definitions, Rome, 23-25 January 2002 FOREWORD For a long time, nations have recognized the important roles of their forests as a vital economic, environmental, social and cultural asset. In passing laws...»

«Stockholm School of Economics in St. Petersburg Working Paper #00-103R1 DEVELOPING A MODEL OF LEADERSHIP STYLES: WHAT WORKS BEST IN RUSSIA? Carl F. Fey Stockholm School of Economics in Saint Petersburg and Stockholm School of Economics P.O. Box 6501 S-11383 Stockholm, Sweden Tel. (46-8)-736-9450 Fax. (1-419)-831-2073 E-mail: Carl.Fey@hhs.se Margarita Adeava Stockholm School of Economics in Saint Petersburg Shvedsky Per. 2 Box 102 191186 St. Petersburg, Russia Margarita.Adeava@sseru.org...»

«Fundraising Ideas Ideas to inspire and assist your fundraising efforts! Create and manage your personal fundraising webpage on First Giving You can create your own personal fundraising page through the SADS Foundation. Just contact us and we can help you to customize your page with a personal message, photo, and goal amount. Then you are ready to send emails to family and friends and direct people to the webpage to make online donations. It really is that easy! Join our Facebook Page, follow us...»

«Advocates for Ohio’s Future 510 East Mound Street, Suite 200 Columbus, OH 43215 (614) 602-2463 | (614) 602-2464 | Fax (614) 228-5150 www.advocatesforohio.org Testimony on HB 153, The Biennial Budget Before the House Finance Committee April 14, 2011 By Scott Britton, Coordinator Chairman Amstutz, Ranking Member Sykes, and Members of the Committee: My name is Scott Britton, and I am coordinator of Advocates for Ohio’s Future, a statewide coalition of health, human service, and early care &...»

«Book Discussion Event hosted by Concord College and UNA Shropshire VIJAY MEHTA [vijay@vmpeace.org] Where Concord College Acton Burnell, Shrewsbury Shropshire SY5 7PF Thursday, 26th September When 3:45pm Start CONTENTS  Introduction  Reasons for Writing the Book  Armed Conflict and Unethical World  War is Wealth: Violence Costs World Economy 11% of Global GDP  Military Industrial Complex and the Damage Done by it  Rise in Militarism, Oppression of Developing Countries, Increase...»





 
<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.dissertation.xlibx.info - Dissertations, online materials

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.