«Anna Eplényi: THE LANDSCAPE CHARACTERISATION OF KALOTASZEG FINAL THESIS OF THE DISSERTATION Supervisors: Kristóf Fatsar, PhD Ildikó Réka Nagy ...»
CORVINUS UNIVERSITY BUDAPEST
DOCTORAL COUNCIL OF LIFE SCIENCES
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY
THE LANDSCAPE CHARACTERISATION OF KALOTASZEG
FINAL THESIS OF THE DISSERTATION
Supervisors: Kristóf Fatsar, PhD
Ildikó Réka Nagy Báthory, PhD Budapest, 2012 According to the decision on the 26th November 2012. the Doctoral Council of Life Sciences, Landscape Architecture and Landscape Ecology listed the following
COMMITTEEChairman Attila Csemez, DSc members György Füleky, DSc Albert Fekete, PhD Zsolt Molnár, PhD Ágnes Herczeg, CSc Opposers Zsuzsanna Illyés, CSc Zoltán Karancsi, PhD secretary Imola G. Tar, PhD 2
I. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES OF THE DISSERTATION
After reviewing and taking out the two key points from the international landscape- characterisation tendencies (historic – and development-oriented; HLC – LCA), I added graphical visualisation as well. During my PhD preparatory years (2009-to the present) under the Doctoral Council of the University I investigated this subject matter with frequent field-trips and voluntary cooperative work with student and collegues.
The basic research-questions are: 1. “Is it possible to prove the ethnographical region of Kalotaszeg as a “landscape”? 2. How does the ethnographical aspects relate to the landscape unit analysed from the point of landscape-characterisation? What special geomorhological forms, spatial arrangements, landscape character-patterns distinguish and justify Kalotaszeg as a typical landscape? How the finer, individual character-features separate the larger landscape-region into smaller units?” II. METHODOLOGY Beside the 40-45 villages, which this ethnographic area contains according to former studies, I included 116 settlements (2780 km2 ) into the survey, in order to find the transitional areas, borders where the Kalotaszeg-landscape-character becomes different.
Ethnographically Kalotaszeg is divided into 4 districts: Felszeg (~Upper part), Alszeg 3 (~Lower Part), Nádas-mente (Nádas-vally) and Kapus-Gyalu transitional area. Therefore the research not only wishes to recognise the “region’s common-landscape-characteristics” but also deals with the differences and changes in the “district’s individual physiognomy”.
In my research I compared two partially parallel methodological issues. – In Chapter II. I completed my visual and personal experience of the area with geological data and with the morphology of the landscape surface. Based on examining the volumes (hills-mound) and the spaces (valleys, vales) of this expansive, diverse, rolling hillside-upland I concluded “Landform-types” peculiar to Kalotaszeg and the surrounding areas. After this phase I set up the hierarchy of “landscape-character AREAS” and “landscape-character TYPES” in Kalotaszeg, and consequently I determined the concept of “landscape-character ZONES”.
These are certain areas/districts with common landscape-characters (scale, pattern, texture) which relate to ethnographical factors.
On the research area 13 Zones could be differentiated which were visualized with 3D-modell sketches and described in detail with landscape aesthetical aspects, such as:
spatial diversity, landscape morphology, scale of naturalness, scale of stewardship, coherence, complexity, image-likeness and symbolic values.
Chapter III. is based on the analysis of site-related landscape-character features and landscape-character patterns in nine areas. Capter III. also includes agricultural statistics from the 19-20th century of which I could establish a self-developed landscape-evaluation method to describe the role of six factors in the landscape-characterisation : forest, arable land, pasturing, water-buffalo livestock, garden and orchard, and vinery. From these data I could conclude objective site-specific chatacters that are exclusive to the Kalotaszeg landscape character.
As a result of several years of my local historical, and archive-research I integrated historical images, old maps, aerial photographs, plans and field-descriptions into these topics, so this method, comparing to the earlier, is rather past and historical oriented. Some of these land-use categories also made up of distinct landscape-patterns which influenced the landscape character, therefore my paper deals with all details, ( size, forms, graphical features and frequency) even if they are represented in low percent (raster-orchards, vertically divided vinery fields, mottled tree pastures, dark conifer belts or reed plot).
4 Patterns of forest and agricultural terraces (=lynchets) were analyzed in correlation with morphological fitting onto the terrain, and were visualized with schema-drawings. Finally, three more anthropological elements were examined having strong impacts on the landscape-character of Kalotaszeg region: 1.the settlement structure and ground-plot pattern; 2. the view-shed and spatial distance of church-towers, 3. and the influence of mining, removal, erosion, landslide to the landscape surface.
III. RESULTS As result of the study I compared the two approaches relevant to methodology as well as to territorial issues. At first the conclusions of the geomorphologic- and spatialbased landscape character assessment integrated with historical network aspects. At second I sum up (in tables, chart-diagrams and maps) the importance of statistic-based landscapefactors which have an impact on the character. According to the final scores of the villageslist (=How much they are typical of Kalotaszeg?) I could evaluate them in increasing order, as well as in zones. Both samples showed significant correlations with the original hypothetical classification: How much they are typical Kalotaszeg-type villages? Finally I compared all those landscape character issues which either prove the “landscape-unity” of Kalotaszeg; or underlines the finer “style-distribution” of the districts. All information is summed up in a “Final Landscape Character Table” attached at the back of the dissertation. The thesis (9) of the doctoral dissertation described below, conclude the results from two approaches: (Kalotaszeg-) site-related statements and conclusion of this landscape characterisation combined with ethnographical issues.
THESIS_1: As a result of the landscape character analysis I concluded, that Kalotaszeg can be described as a unique and distinctive region with certain geomorphologic space-types, landscape-elements and landscape-patterns - which are typical and common in the whole district. Together with the folk-art and culture of Kalotaszeg exists parallel a unique “Kalotaszeg landscape” as well.
5 The individuality of this Kalotaszeg-landscape can be described with the following characteristics: very distributed, undulating, rolling hillside based on Eocene-limestone;
the geological background resulted particular geomorphologic formations; this led to various visual diversity, view-sheds, and string dynamics in the scenery. Chalk-quarries and mines of good quality limestone give a special pattern to the landscape, while it also has historical importance in the landscape formation. Because of its open vistas the area cannot be considered as an upland; the silhouettes have a strong impact on the examined territory of the river divided-valleys. Consequently the rather distributed and low percentage of forest-land cover, the concentrated and closed forests/forest boundary turn out to be a crucial landscape-character pattern and border feature. The horizontal lines of scrubbed lynchets - (long strips which allow ploughing on the hillsides) with their strong appearance in the view - are the key-landscape character-pattern of this region. A common typical feature of the whole region is the historical importance of water-buffalo livestock (19-20th century) and the historical significance of smaller vineyards all around the villages. Finally, the last crucial man-made character element is the special woodcarved house facades from the ‘20-‘30-ies, which influence the street and the settlement views.
THESIS_2: The landscape-character assessment underlines and emphasises the ethnical and ethnographical distribution of Kalotaszeg (Up-land, Low-land, Nádasvalley, Kapus-Gyalu area) by highlighting the slight differences in dominant surface-morphology as well is in the diversity of landscape patterns and elements.
Such morphological landscape character differences are: the horizontal plateaus and concave gradient slopes of limestone strata around Felszeg, in contradiction to the Nádas-river valley, where overcast strata are leaning 10% degree slope to the northeast, creating a long, and gentle northern hillside and a south-facing steep downhill. In relation to landscape-patterns orchards and vineyards are more common on the warmer LowerPart; while forest patches are absent in the Upper-part, therefore the silhouette of Vlegyásza-Mt. and the middle-age church towers play a more intensive role in the open 6 landscape. (These features are lacking on the eastern part). Open forest woodlands are more common in the eastern Nádas-valley.
THESIS_3: The lynchets not only have historical importance in traditional land-use, but with their organic forms and fitting to the landscape-morphology they are crucial pattern-characteristics in the scenery. Their occurrence is typical for Kalotaszeg, therefore this pattern is appropriate to create border around it. With their variegation (morphology, size, forms, lights) and more-and-more scrubby natural appearance it bear with special aesthetic value.
The terraces cover the rolling landscape as a veil with their waving, linear-clusters and high diversity of edge-effects. Their deeper study unravels further details about landscape-historical aspects. (For example: the strong correlation of land strips with
ownership.) According to the micro morphology of the area 4 types can be separated:
declivous, even, sleep, and broken. All of which were demonstrated with images and model-sketches in my paper. The pattern marks the borders of Kalotaszeg, and they are typical in high-density area in the eastern part of Upper-Part, and Nádas-valley. The lower alpine zone they occur on the declivous hilltops rather then on very steep hillsides. They are also rare in the Lower-Part, where the drainage basin is sensitive for erosion.
Consequently in my the landscape aesthetical study it became clear that the fascinating and grandiose effort, through time and space, created a local dynamic in this terrainformation which would be hard, if not impossible, to occur in the same style anywhere else. It’s complexity and coherence derive from its rhythm and various light- and form effects. Its natural harmony originates from the fact that the goal wasn’t to create “beauty”, although it created artistic magnificence. Because its complexity in landscape history, landscape scenery and aesthetic I conclude lynchets should be a landscape heritage for future protection.
7 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 7 8 9 10 9 THESIS_4: To determine the “Landscape characteristics of Kalotaszeg” the following particulars have priority : (1) first is the terrain-morphological aspect and form-typology because of its waving, open, rolling spatial experiences (silhouettes, hill forms and Drainage basins. (2) Second is the importance of forms, pattern, and borders of forests because it’s middle-low percent in land-use and open woodland, parkland style. (3) The third crucial factor is to recognise the main landscape patterns that have special shapes, outlines, rhythms (exp.: waving lynchtes, quadratic alpine enclosed-fields and pastures, raster orchards, vertical vineyards). (4) Finally, it is necessary to take the view sheds of focuses (=point-like features) into account in the characterisation process.
THESIS_5: Some landscape-patterns in spite of their small extension in land-use distribution (1-3-5%) play much larger and more important role in the visual characters. These derive from their special forms, shapes, individual rhythm, colour or their intensive exposure on the hillside.
In contradiction its low rate in land-use the vineyard in the Lower-Part, the vertical fan-tail-like grape grooving pattern, opening on the bottom of the hillside, give strong visual individuality for the region. The tetragonal-raster fruit-tree-orchards led to a strong distinct geometrical effect in the natural landforms. The dark, band-like conifer-plantation oh the south facing cliff-tops and the dotted open woodland-pastures are recognisable from the distance. This fact draws the attention to the fact that “small” land-use categories (seem to be inessential) should be examined deeply in character-assessment, and special attention should be paid during field-trips because their small shapes and forms are rarely marked on maps.