FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Dissertations, online materials

Pages:   || 2 | 3 | 4 |

«I. INTRODUCTION Gemini surfactants are composed of two monomeric surfactant molecules linked by a spacer chain. They constitute a new class of ...»

-- [ Page 1 ] --

Models of Gemini Surfactants∗

Haim Diamant1 and David Andelman2


School of Chemistry and 2 School of Physics & Astronomy,

Beverly and Raymond Sackler Faculty of Exact Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel

arXiv:cond-mat/0302184v1 [cond-mat.soft] 10 Feb 2003


Gemini surfactants are composed of two monomeric surfactant molecules linked by a spacer chain. They constitute a new class of amphiphilic molecules having its own distinct behavior. Since their first systematic studies over a decade ago, gemini surfactants have been the subject of intensive research (see Ref. [1] and references therein). Research has been motivated by the advantages of gemini surfactants over regular ones with respect to various applications, e.g., their increased surface activity, lower critical micelle concentration (cmc), and useful viscoelastic properties such as effective thickening.

Besides their importance for applications, the behavior of gemini surfactants is qualitatively different in several respects from that of regular surfactants, posing challenges to current theories of surfactant self-assembly. The main puzzles raised by gemini surfactants can be summarized as follows [1].

• Surface behavior. The area per molecule in a saturated monolayer at the water–air interface, made of gemini surfactants with polymethylene spacers (m-s-m surfactants, where s is the spacer length and m the tail length in hydrocarbon groups), has a non-monotonous dependence on s [2, 3]. For example, for tail length of m = 12 the molecular area at the water–air interface is found to increase with s for short spacers, reach a maximum

–  –  –


2 In view of the amount of experimental work and its unusual findings, the number of theoretical studies devoted to gemini surfactants has been surprisingly small. In this chapter we have, therefore, two aims. The first is to review the current state of theoretical models of gemini surfactants. The second, perhaps more important aim, is to indicate the considerable gaps in our knowledge and the key open questions awaiting theoretical work. In Sec. II we set the stage by reviewing several theoretical models of surfactant self-assembly. This will facilitate the discussion in Sec. III of the gemini surfactant models, which can be viewed as extensions to previous models of regular surfactants. Finally, in Sec. IV we conclude and summarize the open questions.


In this section we review several theoretical models pertaining to the self-assembly of soluble surfactants. This is not meant to be an exhaustive review of self-assembly theory but merely to provide the appropriate background for the models of gemini surfactants discussed in Sec. III.

A. Surface behavior

Let us start by considering an aqueous surfactant solution below the cmc. The soluble surfactant molecules selfassemble into a condensed layer at the water–air interface, referred to as a Gibbs monolayer (to be distinguished from Langmuir monolayers that form when insoluble surfactants are spread on the water–air interface) [22]. Since the surfactant is water-soluble, this layer exchanges molecules with the bulk solution and a nonuniform concentration profile forms. Typical surfactants have strong surface activity, i.e., the energy gained by a molecule when it migrates to the surface is much larger than the thermal energy kB T. As a result, the concentration profile drops sharply to its bulk value within a molecular distance from the surface (hence the term monolayer).

The number of molecules participating in a Gibbs monolayer per unit area, the surface excess Γ, is obtained from integrating the excess concentration (with respect to the bulk one) over the entire solution. Such a monolayer can be regarded as a separate sub-system at thermodynamic equilibrium and in contact with a large reservoir of molecules having temperature T and chemical potential µ. From the excess free energy per unit area of this system, γ(T, µ),

which is by definition the surface tension of the solution, we get the number of molecules per unit area:

∂γ Γ=−. (1) ∂µ T This is referred to as the Gibbs equation [22]. For dilute solutions µ ∝ kB T ln C, where C is the bulk surfactant concentration. (The constant of proportionality is one for nonionic surfactants and ionic ones at high salt concentration;

it has a higher value for salt-free ionic surfactant solutions, where strong correlations between the different ions lead to non-ideal activity coefficients [22].) Hence,

–  –  –

Because of the high surface activity of surfactant molecules, leading to a sharp concentration profile at the water–air interface, Γ−1 is commonly interpreted as the average surface area per molecule, a. The second consequence of the high surface activity is that, already for C much smaller than the cmc, the monolayer becomes saturated, i.e., Γ stops increasing with C. Experimentally, the curve describing the change in γ as a function of ln C becomes a straight line with a negative slope proportional to −Γ.

We now wish to find a simple estimate for the energy of lateral interaction between molecules in such a saturated monolayer (repeating a well-known result of Ref. [11]). Saturation implies that the molecules are packed in an energetically optimal density, such that there is no gain in adding or removing molecules. This optimum arises from a competition between attractive and repulsive interactions. The attractive interaction tries to decrease the area per molecule, and we can phenomenologically write its energy per molecule as proportional to a, γ1 a, where the proportionality constant γ1 has units of energy per unit area. Since the attraction comes mainly from the desire of the hydrocarbon tails to minimize their contact with water, γ1 should be roughly equal to the hydrocarbon–water interfacial tension (γ1 ≃ 50 mN/m). The repulsive interaction, on the other hand, tries to increase a and, at the same phenomenological level, we can write its energy per molecule as inversely proportional to a, α/a, where α is a positive constant. Minimizing the sum of these two contributions we get for the interaction energy per molecule 3

–  –  –

As the solution concentration is increased beyond the cmc the surfactant molecules start to form aggregates. Unlike simple solute molecules (e.g., alkanes), which undergo macroscopic phase separation upon increasing concentration or changing temperature, surfactants form micelles at the mesoscopic scale. The challenges posed to theories of surfactant self-assembly are to predict the micellization point as a function of concentration (i.e., the cmc, hereafter referred to by the corresponding volume fraction ϕcmc ) and temperature (Tm ), as well as the micelle shape and size.

The main complications come from the fact that micellization is not a macroscopic phase transition — the aggregate sizes are finite and polydisperse — and thus the well-developed theoretical framework of phase transitions does not strictly apply.

From a thermodynamic point of view, the difference between surfactant micellization and phase separation lies in the following observation [12]. For alkanes solubilized in water, for example, the (Gibbs) free energy per molecule in an aggregate of size N, gN, is a monotonously decreasing function of N — for N → ∞ gN tends to the free energy per molecule in the bulk alkane phase, g∞, while for smaller N gN g∞ due to unfavorable surface terms of the finite cluster. As a result, there is a critical concentration (or critical temperature) at which the favorable size changes discontinuously from monomers solubilized in water (N = 1) to a macroscopic phase of bulk alkane (N → ∞). The first-order phase transition point is reached when the chemical potential of monomers exceeds min{gN } = g∞. In a dilute solution this implies that ϕc = eg∞ /(kB T ), kB Tc = g∞ / ln ϕ. (We have set the free energy of the N = 1 state as the reference, g1 = 0.) In the case of surfactants, by contrast, gN has a minimum at a finite aggregate size N ∗. As a result, when the chemical potential exceeds gN ∗, a large population of aggregates appears, whose sizes are distributed around N ∗. Hence, the micellization point can be estimated as

–  –  –

FIG. 1: Packing constraints on a surfactant in an aggregate. Each head group occupies an optimal area a0 on the aggregate surface; the tail chain occupies a volume v and cannot stretch beyond length l. These constraints define the packing parameter, P = v/(a0 l), which suggests the possible aggregate shape.

Once the shape is determined we can find the maximum allowed aggregation number. For example, for spherical micelles N 4πl2 /a0 = (4π/3)l3 /v, and we get

–  –  –

We see how competing interactions between the molecules (giving rise to a0 ) together with the incompressibility of the micellar core lead to finite micelles. Since the tail chains usually should not stretch to their full extent, the actual aggregation number will be smaller than this upper bound.

Yet, these geometrical arguments cannot provide us with theoretical predictions as to the optimal molecular area (S) a0 itself or the aggregation free energy gN ∗, as well as their dependence on parameters such as temperature or salt concentration. In order to get such information and subsequently predict the micellization point, micelle shape and size, one needs a more detailed theory.

–  –  –

where a is the area per molecule on the aggregate surface and R the aggregate size (radius or width). Note that R is not an independent variable but is related to N and a via the aggregate geometry S, e.g., for spherical micelles, N a = 4πR2.

(i) The driving force for aggregation is the hydrophobic effect, i.e., the free energy per surfactant molecule ghc (S) gained by shielding the hydrocarbon groups from water [24]. This contribution to gN is negative and, to a good approximation, independent of N and the aggregate geometry S. Namely, its contribution to the entire aggregate free energy is linear in N and tends to increase the aggregate size. The hydrophobic term ghc depends linearly on the number of hydrocarbon groups in the surfactant, with a reduction of roughly kB T per hydrocarbon group [12].

That is why, for regular surfactants, the cmc decreases exponentially with the number of hydrocarbon groups in the molecule and is reduced by a factor of roughly 2–3 per each additional hydrocarbon group.

(ii) The hydrophobic gain is corrected by an interfacial contribution gint due to the unfavorable contact between the hydrocarbon core and water,

gint (a) = γ1 (a − amin ), (9)

where γ1 is the interfacial tension of the core–water interface (roughly equal to the hydrocarbon–water interfacial tension), and amin is the minimum area per molecule, i.e., the interfacial area occupied by a head group. This contribution evidently acts to reduce the area per molecule.

(iii) If the surfactant head groups are charged, there is electrostatic repulsion between them, acting to increase a.

Within the Poisson–Boltzmann theory this electrostatic contribution is given by [25]:

–  –  –

where β = 4πlB λD /a is a dimensionless charging parameter depending on two other lengths, the Debye screening length λD and the Bjerrum length lB. The Debye screening length in the solution is λD = (8πlB csalt )−1/2, where csalt is the added salt concentration, taken here to be monovalent, and lB = e2 /(εkB T ) is about 7 ˚ for aqueous solution A with dielectric constant ε = 80 at room temperature. (For simplicity, a monovalent head group has been assumed.) Finally, c is the mean curvature of the aggregate (e.g., 1/R for spherical micelles).

(iv) There is also steric repulsion between head groups. From the (non-ideal) entropy of mixing per molecule we get for this contribution

–  –  –

Following Widom’s statistical-mechanical model of microemulsions [26], a host of lattice models were presented for treating surfactant self-assembly (see, e.g., Refs. [27, 28, 29, 30, 31]). These molecular “toy models” represent the water molecules and various groups in the surfactant as Ising spins on a discrete lattice. The various interactions between the groups are represented by ferromagnetic or antiferromagnetic couplings between nearest-neighbor spins (see Fig. 2). Evidently, this is a very crude description of surfactant solutions and is not expected to yield quantitative predictions. Another difficulty is attaining thermodynamic equilibrium in simulations of these self-assembling systems, which contain slowly relaxing, large aggregates. Such models, however, have been shown to correctly reproduce various qualitative features of amphiphilic systems, e.g., aggregate formation, aggregate shape, and the overall structure of phase diagrams. The main advantage of this statistical-mechanical approach is that, by tuning a small number of parameters, one can get from the MC simulations insight into molecular mechanisms that determine the overall system behavior. Here we briefly present a model similar to that of Ref. [31]. It will serve us when we discuss gemini surfactants in Sec. III B.

–  –  –

Pages:   || 2 | 3 | 4 |

Similar works:

«Formation of the Galactic Halo. Inside and Out ASP Conference Series, Vol. 92, 1996 Heather Morrison and Ata Sarajedini, eds. Globular Clusters as Fossils of Galaxy Formation Richard B. Larson Yale Astronomy Department, Box 208101, New Haven, CT 06520-8101 Abstract. The globular clusters in the halos of large galaxies like our own are almost certainly fossil remnants of the early star-forming subsystems from which these galaxies were built. The ages of the halo clusters in our Galaxy indicate...»

«Measuring the Atmospheric Influence on Differential Astrometry: a Simple Method Applied to Wide Field CCD Frames N. Zacharias1 U.S. Naval Observatory, 3450 Mass. Ave. N.W., Washington D.C. 20392, Electronic mail: nz@pyxis.usno.navy.mil Received ; accepted PASP revised manuscript, 12 Aug 96, proofs to NZ 1 with Universities Space Research Association (USRA), Division of Astronomy and Space Physics, Washington D.C., based on observations made at KPNO and CTIO –2– ABSTRACT Sets of short...»

«Summit on Cost in Higher Education Monday, Oct. 21, 2013 Federal Reserve Bank of Boston Speaker and Panelist Biographies Neal Abraham Neal Abraham is Five College Professor of Physics and the executive director of Five Colleges, Inc., one of the oldest and most successful higher education consortia in the U.S. (serving Amherst, Hampshire, Mount Holyoke and Smith colleges and the University of Massachusetts Amherst). Prior to assuming his current position in August 2009, he served for 11 years...»

«Sexagesimonoveno Período Ordinario de Sesiones de la Comisión 17 de enero de 1997 Lima – Perú DECISION 398 Transporte Internacional de Pasajeros por Carretera, sustitutoria de la Decisión 289 LA COMISION DEL ACUERDO DE CARTAGENA, VISTOS: El Capítulo XI del Acuerdo de Cartagena, la Decisión 289 de la Comisión, y la Propuesta 292/Mod. 1 de la Junta; CONSIDERANDO: Que el transporte internacional de pasajeros por carretera constituye uno de los instrumentos de ayuda eficaz para la...»

«Las mujeres y la guerrilla: ¿un espacio para las políticas de género? Women and guerrila: a space for a gender agenda? Carolina Jiménez Sánchez 1 Universidad de Málaga (España) Recibido: 26-03-14 Aprobado: 11-04-14 Resumen El presente artículo examina la naturaleza de la guerra de guerrillas desde una perspectiva de género y con una especial consideración de su impacto en los diversos escenarios iberoamericanos en los que se libró o se libran luchas armadas con la intervención de...»

«Chapter Two Invitation and Gloria based on A Theology of Kinship with Creation Invitation to Worship: We extend our worshipping community by inviting all our kin in creation to celebrate with us. With the psalmists we not only praise God for creation but also worship with our kin in creation. We are also conscious of relating to other creatures as our kin— including Earth as a primal parent.Gloria: We sing a Gloria that reflect our desire peace for on Earth, with Earth and with all our kin in...»

«FUTURE OBSERVATIONS OF AND MISSIONS TO MERCURY S. ALAN STERN University of Colorado and FAITH VILAS NASA Johnson Space Center The continued and expanded study of Mercury is important to several aspects of planetary science. Wejrst review the broad scientijc objectives of such exploration and describe the methods by which such scientijc objectives may be addressed. Groundbased optical, infrared and radar astronomy are discussed$rst, followed by Earth-orbital observations and in situ missions to...»

«Spectroscopy of Globular Clusters out to Large Radius in the Sombrero Galaxy Terry J. Bridges Department of Physics, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada; tjb@astro.queensu.ca Katherine L. Rhode1 Astronomy Department, Wesleyan University, Middletown, CT 06459; kathy@astro.wesleyan.edu and Department of Astronomy, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520 Stephen E. Zepf Department of Physics & Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824; zepf@pa.msu.edu Ken C. Freeman...»

«Los dos caminos y los dos destinos Veintidós entregas de un curso de autoestudio acerca del camino de la salvación David Rodgers W., Casilla 624, Rancagua, Chile rodgersdv@123.cl Junio 2005. Edición formateada en Venezuela, 2005 1 CONTENIDO 1 Presentación 2 ¿Por qué hay un camino ancho? 3 Cómo llegó a morar el pecado en uno hoy día 4 Características de los que andan por el camino espacioso y cómo Dios les salva 5 La Puerta y la seguridad que brinda 6 El camino angosto 7 La muerte 8...»

«PRZYKŁADOWY EGZAMIN Z JĘZYKA ANGIELSKIEGO POZIOM B2 Answer Sheet PAPER I. LISTENING (14 see: points) PAPER II. READING (28 points) PART 1 Read the following text and decide whether the statements are TRUE or FALSE : UWAGA: Zamiast tego polecenia może być: Choose the best answer A, B or C. 15. Astronomers are sure that there are intelligent species outside Earth. 16. Stephen Hawking claims that aliens’ visit on Earth would be beneficial to humans. 17. He believes that we might not be alone...»

«University of Szeged (SZTE) Doctoral School of English and American Literature and Culture Nóra Borthaiser Performing New Cosmoses: Environmental Matters and Disability Issues in Disney’s Animations between 1990–2010 PhD Dissertation Supervisors: Réka M. Cristian, PhD Zoltán Vajda, PhD Szeged Spring, 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents Acknowledgments Abstract / Összefoglaló 1. Introduction 2. From Mickey Mouse to the Desk Lamp Story-telling in the 20th and 21st Centuries:...»

«Juan Bautista de la Salle, vida y obra. Hno. Juan Bautista De las Heras 1.PRESENTACIÓN Desde los primeros biógrafos hasta nuestros días, muchos han sido los libros que se han escrito en torno a Juan Bautista de La Salle. Este escrito no pretende agotar el tema. En todo caso, recordaremos los hitos más importantes de su vida, fijándonos, sobre todo, en aquellos acontecimientos que fueron configurando la fundación del Instituto de los Hermanos de las Escuelas Cristianas. También...»

<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.dissertation.xlibx.info - Dissertations, online materials

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.