WWW.DISSERTATION.XLIBX.INFO
FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Dissertations, online materials
 
<< HOME
CONTACTS



Pages:   || 2 | 3 |

«1 c Cambridge University Press 2015 J. Plasma Phys. (2015), vol. 81, 395810601 doi:10.1017/S0022377815001063 The electromotive force in multi-scale ...»

-- [ Page 1 ] --

1

c Cambridge University Press 2015

J. Plasma Phys. (2015), vol. 81, 395810601

doi:10.1017/S0022377815001063

The electromotive force in multi-scale flows at

high magnetic Reynolds number

Steven M. Tobias1, † and Fausto Cattaneo2

1 Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Leeds, Leeds LS8 1DS, UK

2 Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of Chicago, 5640 South Ellis Avenue,

Chicago, IL 60637, USA

(Received 1 May 2015; revised 18 August 2015; accepted 19 August 2015) Recent advances in dynamo theory have been made by examining the competition between small- and large-scale dynamos at high magnetic Reynolds number Rm.

Small-scale dynamos rely on the presence of chaotic stretching whilst the generation of large-scale fields occurs in flows lacking reflectional symmetry via a systematic electromotive force (EMF). In this paper we discuss how the statistics of the EMF (at high Rm) depend on the properties of the multi-scale velocity that is generating it.

In particular, we determine that different scales of flow have different contributions to the statistics of the EMF, with smaller scales contributing to the mean without increasing the variance. Moreover, we determine when scales in such a flow act independently in their contribution to the EMF. We further examine the role of large-scale shear in modifying the EMF. We conjecture that the distribution of the EMF, and not simply the mean, largely determines the dominant scale of the magnetic field generated by the flow.

1. Introduction It is a great pleasure and privilege to be invited to contribute to this volume in honour of the centenary of the birth of Professor Ya. B. Zel’dovich. Zel’dovich’s research interests were so wide ranging that it is possible to discuss almost any aspect of physics and describe the significant and lasting impact that he had on that field. We shall not even attempt to describe the breadth of the contributions and deep insight of Professor Zel’dovich’s research, since this has been noted repeatedly by both scientists and historians of science (Sunyaev 2004; Hargittai 2013), nor shall we review one of the many fields to which Zel’dovich made such telling contributions. Rather, we shall describe a new investigation that brings together two of Professor Zel’dovich’s research interests, random flows in magnetohydrodynamics and dynamo theory.

An understanding and categorisation of the dynamo properties of turbulent flows can only emerge with the recognition that turbulent flows exist as a superposition of coherent and random structures. The ratio of the importance of each of these classes of flow to the dynamo properties depends on the physical setting of the flow. In general, for astrophysical and geophysical flows, the interaction of rotation and stratification leads to the enhanced importance of coherent structures (see e.g. Tobias & Cattaneo † Email address for correspondence: smt@maths.leeds.ac.uk 2 S. M. Tobias and F. Cattaneo 2008a). This typically involves long-lived structures – by which we mean structures with a coherence time longer than their turnover time – contributing significantly to the generation of magnetic fields.

Dynamo theory has traditionally been separated into two distinct approaches.

The first, often termed ‘small-scale dynamo theory’ or ‘fluctuation dynamo theory’, examines whether and how fluid flows can act so as to sustain magnetic fields on scales smaller than or up to the typical scale of the energy-containing eddies. Despite the irritating presence of anti-dynamo theorems, which rule out the possibility of dynamo action if either the fluid flow or the magnetic field possesses too much symmetry, it has now been established that sufficiently turbulent flows at high enough magnetic Reynolds number (Rm) are almost guaranteed to act as small-scale dynamos (Vainshtein & Kichatinov 1986; Finn & Ott 1988; Galloway & Proctor 1992; Childress & Gilbert 1995). At this point it is worth noting that the two most famous and irritating theorems that dynamos must circumvent are Cowling’s theorem (Cowling 1933), which prescribes the possibility of an axisymmetric magnetic field being generated by dynamo action, and Zel’dovich’s theorem (Zel’dovich 1957), which rules out two-dimensional flows (i.e. flows possessing only two components) as dynamos. Much ingenuity has been brought to bear in determining simple flows that are able to circumvent the strictures of Zel’dovich’s theorem; in this paper we will be utilising a class of flows (so-called 2.5-dimensional flows) that are able to produce dynamos and are amenable to computation at high Rm.

The second approach, termed ‘large-scale dynamo theory’ (Steenbeck, Krause & Rädler 1966; Moffatt 1978; Krause & Raedler 1980; Brandenburg & Subramanian 2005), is utilised to describe how systematic magnetic fields can emerge on scales larger than the turbulent eddies. It is this theory that is often used to describe the dynamics of astrophysical magnetic fields such as those found in planets, stars and galaxies. Indeed the 11-year solar cycle, in which the global magnetic field of the Sun waxes and wanes, with magnetic waves travelling from mid-latitudes towards the equator as the cycle progresses, is attributed to the action of a large-scale dynamo. Large-scale dynamos are subject to the same anti-dynamo theorems as small-scale dynamos (no assumption about the scale of the field is made in either Cowling’s or Zel’dovich’s theorems), and so the utilisation of similar ingenious tricks as those brought to bear for small-scale dynamos (see e.g. Roberts 1972) may prove particularly useful.





The role of the turbulent cascade in both small- and large-scale dynamo theory has been extensively studied, and a complete review is well beyond the scope of this article. In many cases multi-scale flows are driven by a forcing at moderate scales in a system at high fluid Reynolds numbers Re. The importance of inertia at high Re usually leads to the formation of a turbulent cascade and the emergence of a statistically stationary flow that exists on a large range of spatial scales (i.e. a multiscale flow). This is a nice procedure, since the properties of the flow can be changed by the addition of rotation or stratification or modification of the forcing. However, in this set-up it is extremely difficult to retain precise control of the properties of the turbulent cascade (for example, the spectral slope of the flow, the correlation time of the eddies and the (scale-dependent) degree of helicity of the flow). Another popular setting for examining turbulent dynamo action is that where the flow is driven by thermal driving leading to convection, in either plane layers or spherical shells (Tobias, Cattaneo & Brummell 2008; Käpylä, Korpi & Brandenburg 2010; Augustson et al.

2015). These are natural systems to study owing to their importance in geophysical and astrophysical fluids. However, here energy input occurs on a range of spatial Multi-scale EMF at high Rm 3 and temporal scales, and control over the properties of the turbulent cascade is even more difficult than for driven flows. Categorising the properties of the spectra of such turbulent flows (both forced and convective) is the focus of much ongoing research and we do not pursue this further in this article.

Rather, we take the view that, for the kinematic dynamo problem, more control can be exerted by prescribing the form of the flow, rather than that of the driving.

This technique has been utilised successfully in determining what flow properties are essential for dynamo action and indeed for dynamo action at high Rm. Statistical theories, such as those close to the heart of Zel’dovich, have also led to the characterisation of the dynamo properties of flows with zero or short correlation times; for a review see Tobias, Cattaneo & Boldyrev (2013). It has been demonstrated, inter alia, that these random flows can act as dynamos (even when the magnetic field dissipates in the inertial range of the turbulence – the so-called low-Pm problem), and may produce large-scale fields if the flow lacks reflectional symmetry (although these will be subdominant to fields generated on the resistive scale (Boldyrev, Cattaneo & Rosner 2005)).

The competition between coherent structures and random flows in generating small-scale magnetic fields has been systematically studied in a series of papers (Cattaneo & Tobias 2005; Tobias & Cattaneo 2008b). It has been shown that the presence of coherence in space and time can overcome the randomness and lead to systematically enhanced small-scale dynamo action. Furthermore, the small-scale dynamo properties of a multi-scale flow that is dominated by coherent (in time) structures has been elucidated; the slope of the spectrum was shown to play a key role in determining the velocity scale responsible for dynamo action. Here a competition between the local (i.e. at spatial scale 1/k) magnetic Reynolds number Rm(k) and turnover time τ (k) selects the eddy scale responsible for generating small-scale magnetic fields; hereinafter we term this scale the ‘dynamo scale’. The application of this theory to a multi-scale flow enables the calculation of the expected growth time of the small-scale field, as comparable with the turnover time of the ‘dynamo eddy’.

Of course, for flows lacking reflectional symmetry, this small-scale dynamo must compete with that generating systematic large-scale fields; and compete it does – extremely effectively. In general, unless some process such as diffusion, shear suppression or nonlinearity acts so as to suppress the small-scale dynamo, it will outperform the large-scale dynamo.† At high Rm, diffusion is not really a viable mechanism for this suppression, and so shear and nonlinear effects remain as the prime candidates. In this paper, we shall not focus on this competition, although we shall return to this important consideration in the discussion. Rather, we shall examine the contribution to large-scale field generation (via the electromotive force) of different scales in a multi-scale flow. Once these contributions have been characterised, then a complete theory of the competition between large- and small-scale dynamos is possible.

In the next section we shall describe the general model problem of the calculation of the electromotive force (EMF) in 2.5-dimensional flows and review previous findings for flows on one scale; we shall conclude the section by generalising the set-up to include a flow on a range of spatial scales. We shall argue that, although the mean EMF is important in determining the large-scale dynamo properties, higher moments of the distribution (for example, the variance of the EMF) may determine whether † This was termed the ‘suppression principle’ by Cattaneo & Tobias (2014).

4 S. M. Tobias and F. Cattaneo the large-scale mode is ever seen. In § 3.2 we determine under what circumstances scales in the flow act independently of each other by determining the distributions of the EMF for flows at different spatial scales. We then calculate the moments of the distribution of the EMF as a function of large-scale shear rate (for a variety of flows with differing ranges of spatial scales and correlation times) and construct parametrisations of the effect of shear on the distribution of the EMF. We conclude in the discussion by postulating how our understanding of the factors controlling largeand small-scale dynamo action may be used to determine a priori whether a given flow will lead kinematically to a large- or small-scale dynamo.

2. Formulation As for the dynamo calculations of Tobias & Cattaneo (2013) and Cattaneo & Tobias (2014), we consider a flow for which the basic building block is a cellular flow, with a well-defined characteristic scale and turnover time. In addition, it is useful to consider flows for which the EMF can be unambiguously measured. We therefore utilise the circularly polarised incompressible Galloway–Proctor flow at scale k first introduced by Cattaneo & Tobias (2005). We take Cartesian coordinates (x, y, z) on a 2π-periodic domain, and consider a flow of the form uk = Ak (∂y ψk, −∂x ψk, kψk ), (2.1) where ψk (x, y, t) = sin k((x − ξk ) + cos ωk t) + cos k((y − ηk ) + sin ωk t). (2.2) This 2.5-dimensional flow is maximally helical, taking the form of an infinite array of clockwise and anticlockwise rotating helices such that the origin of the pattern itself rotates in a circle with frequency ωk. Here Ak is an amplitude, and ξk and ηk are offsets that can be varied so as to decorrelate the pattern, and therefore control the degree of helicity. Here they are random constants that are reset every τd, which can therefore be regarded as a decorrelation time. In this paper we only consider the case where ξk = ηk and the flow remains maximally helical.

The dynamo properties of this type of flow acting at one scale are well understood (Cattaneo & Tobias 2005), and so are the inductive properties as measured by the EMF (Roberts 1972; Plunian & Rädler 2002; Courvoisier, Hughes & Tobias 2006;

Courvoisier & Kim 2009). Because the velocity does not depend on the z coordinate, the EMF can easily be measured by applying a z-independent mean field (B0, 0, 0) and measuring the resulting EMF E = u × b, where the angle brackets denote an average over horizontal planes (Roberts 1972).

In this paper we wish to calculate the large-scale induction of a superposition of these flows and therefore set Ak and ωk at each scale k. We are free to choose Ak to mimic the properties of any spectrum of turbulence. Having chosen Ak, there is then a unique choice of ωk such that the associated dynamo action at scale k has the same asymptotic growth rate measured in units of the local turnover time (see e.g. Cattaneo & Tobias 2005). With this choice, all of these cells look the same at their own scale.

The combined cellular flow takes the form of a superposition of these flows on scales between kmin and kmax, i.e. we set kmax (2.3) uc = uk, kmin

–  –  –

We stress here that we have not attempted to model the scale dependence of the kinetic helicity for the multi-scale flow. We believe that this is dependent not only on the form and scale of the driving mechanisms, but also on the prevailing conditions (i.e. rotation rate, stratification and the presence or absence of large-scale shear). This will be investigated in a forthcoming paper.



Pages:   || 2 | 3 |


Similar works:

«Archimedes of Syracuse1 Archimedes of Syracuse (287 212 BCE), the most famous and probably the best mathematician of antiquity, made so many discoveries in mathematics and physics that it is difficult to point to any of them as his greatest. He was born in Syracuse, the principal city-state of Sicily, the son of the astronomer Phidias. He spent considerable time in Alexandria, where he studied with Euclid’s successors. It is there he met Conon of Samos (fl. 245 BCE) and Eratosthenes of Cyrene...»

«STAR FORMATION AND GALACTIC EVOLUTION RICHARD B. LARSON Yale Astronomy Department, Box 208101, New Haven, CT 06520-8101 1 Introduction: Basic Problems Galaxies are, in their observable constituents, basically large bound systems of stars and gas whose components interact continually with each other by the exchange of matter and energy. The interactions that occur between the stars and the gas, most fundamentally the continuing formation of new stars from the gas, cause the properties of...»

«Chapter Two Invitation and Gloria based on A Theology of Kinship with Creation Invitation to Worship: We extend our worshipping community by inviting all our kin in creation to celebrate with us. With the psalmists we not only praise God for creation but also worship with our kin in creation. We are also conscious of relating to other creatures as our kin— including Earth as a primal parent.Gloria: We sing a Gloria that reflect our desire peace for on Earth, with Earth and with all our kin in...»

«Published in Surf. Sci. 602, 2936 (2008). Step Formation on Hydrogen-etched 6H-SiC{0001} Surfaces S. Nie, C. D. Lee§, and R.M. Feenstra* Dept. Physics, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA Y. Ke, R.P. Devaty and W.J. Choyke Dept. Physics and Astronomy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA C. K. Inoki and T. S. Kuan Dept. Physics, University at Albany, SUNY, Albany, NY 12222, USA Gong Gu Sarnoff Corporation, CN5300, Princeton, NJ 08543, USA The formation of step...»

«US Particle Physics: Scientific Opportunities A Strategic Plan for the Next Ten Years Report of the Particle Physics Project Prioritization Panel 29 May 2008 Three frontiers of research in particle physics form an interlocking framework that addresses fundamental questions about the laws of nature and the cosmos.US Particle Physics: Scientific Opportunities A Strategic Plan for the Next Ten Years Report of the Particle Physics Project Prioritization Panel 29 May 2008 i In November 2007, at the...»

«El recreo igualitario Guía de recursos sobre coeducación y espacio Ayto. de Hernani (Gipuzkoa) Introducción Esta guía se enmarca dentro de un programa coeducativo auspiciado por el Consejo de Igualdad y el Área de Igualdad del Ayuntamiento de Hernani (Gipuzkoa) desde octubre de 2003. Comenzamos con unas sesiones de sensibilización para el profesorado y las familias. En una segunda fase, realizamos una pequeña investigación antropológica sobre el uso del espacio en dos centros escolares...»

«Astronomy Cast Episode 76: Lagrange Points Fraser Cain: Gravity is always pulling you down, but there are places in the solar system where gravity balances out. These are called Lagrange points and space agencies use them as stable places to put spacecraft. Nature is on to them and has already been using them for billions of years. Before we get on to it, let’s talk about pronunciation. I said it Lagr-ahunge points. Is that okay? Dr. Pamela Gay: I have heard it said Lagr-ahunge points,...»

«Diplomado de Mediación Social, Familiar, Vecinal y Comunitaria Dirigido a Profesionales, técnicos y estudiantes de las ciencias sociales, a todos quienes desde su ejercicio profesional deben intervenir en disputas y conflictos en los distintos espacios sociales, y para quienes se desempeñan en el ámbito familiar y comunitario, Tribunales de Familia, organizaciones no gubernamentales, Municipios y otras instituciones del ámbito social Objetivo General El Diplomado tiene por objetivo...»

«Theoretical Modeling of the High Redshift Galaxy Population David H. Weinberg Department of Astronomy, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210 Romeel Dav´ e Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544 Jeffrey P. Gardner Department of Astronomy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 Lars Hernquist Department of Astronomy, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138 Neal Katz Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 98195 Abstract....»

«2013 Annual Progress Report and 2014 Program Plan of the Gemini Observatory Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc. Table&of&Contents& 1 Executive Summary 2 Introduction and Overview 3 Science Highlights 3.1! First Results using GeMS/GSAOI 3.2! Gemini NICI Planet-Finding Campaign 3.3! The Sun’s Closest Neighbor Found in a Century 3.4! The Surprisingly Low Black Hole Mass of an Ultraluminous X-Ray Source 7! 3.5! GRB 130606A 3.6! Observing the Accretion Disk of the Active...»

«Handbook for the SXV-M25C Issue 1 June 2004 Starlight Xpress Ltd SXV-M25C SuperHAD 6Megapixel USB One-Shot Colour CCD camera User manual Thank you for purchasing a Starlight Xpress CCD camera. We hope that you will be very satisfied with the results. The SXV-M25C is an advanced, very high-resolution cooled CCD camera, especially designed for ‘One-Shot’ colour astronomical imaging. The features include a built-in, fully programmable, USB 2 super-fast computer interface (USB 1.1 compatible),...»

«Episode 57, “Two Protons Walk Into an H Bar” Dramatis personae: Ben Tippett Brian Cross Nicole Prent Jacqueline Townsend Copyright Ben Tippett The Titanium Physicists Podcast www.titaniumphysics.com Ben: Never be afraid. There's nothing which is known which can't be understood. There's nothing which is understood which can't be explained. For over 50 episodes now, my team and I have brought you to the very frontier of knowledge in physics and astronomy. And still our mission goes on. To...»





 
<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.dissertation.xlibx.info - Dissertations, online materials

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.